What's new

US Air to benefit from M&A activity

With people connecting from NYC, Boston, NJ, etc..., not to mention the vacationers from the smaller markets I think they could fill 319s or 320s to various south american cities. Price is the number one factor for a lot of people and they will connect if the price is right.
Surely you jest, flying an A319/320 that distance......highly doubt the airplane is capable of making the journey. Aruba and Barbados is close to pushing it. CLT could handle more Caribbean, Mexico and Latin destinations IF the opportunities presented themselves. (Many pax bypass PHL already to fly from the NE to the West to avoid PHL. PHL gets a bad rep because NO ONE has been able to correct the operation. PHL has the ability to generate alot of money but someone needs to CREATE A FEASIBLE OPERATIONAL PLAN THAT WORKS.
 
Surely you jest, flying an A319/320 that distance......highly doubt the airplane is capable of making the journey. Aruba and Barbados is close to pushing it. CLT could handle more Caribbean, Mexico and Latin destinations IF the opportunities presented themselves. (Many pax bypass PHL already to fly from the NE to the West to avoid PHL. PHL gets a bad rep because NO ONE has been able to correct the operation. PHL has the ability to generate alot of money but someone needs to CREATE A FEASIBLE OPERATIONAL PLAN THAT WORKS.
PHL works for the most part, weather is the biggest issue there. WN adding more flights is only going to make it worse this year.

Lowest rated engines on the A320 will get you 2000+nm, that will get you to the northern third of south america out of CLT.
 
Most South America destinations are restricted for one, and there just isn't a strong enough market out of the hubs. Other carriers struggle from much stronger hubs, so you really think Philly and North Carolina would support service to Argentina or Brazil?

Well, hopefully when all these mergers are done, it will open up slots in some of the restricted areas. If two carriers that both have slots to a restricted destination merge, that would mean one opens up. If we start flying to Brazil or Argentina, I hope we could use a 767 which should be available once we get the new wide bodies.

I don't know if Phl or clt could support service to South America, but I don't see why not. All I know is flights to Buenos Aires are always full on AA,UA,DL and CO. No idea what the yields are, but the flights are full.
 
PHL works for the most part, weather is the biggest issue there.
Weather isn't the problem PHILLY is. It could be a clear day, and PHILLY has problems. It's the PHILLY PHactor
 
With people connecting from NYC, Boston, NJ, etc..., not to mention the vacationers from the smaller markets I think they could fill 319s or 320s to various south american cities. Price is the number one factor for a lot of people and they will connect if the price is right.

:unsure: Are you talking about the Carribbean, or South America? You might stretch an Airbus narrowbody to Central America, but not South America, and if so, not any of the major places. Much of the traffic is people going home or returning, not vacationers. Ma and Pa Kettle don't up and go to Uruguay. And if they were to connect it would be through MIA or JFK, which have ample SA operations.
 
:unsure: Are you talking about the Carribbean, or South America? You might stretch an Airbus narrowbody to Central America, but not South America, and if so, not any of the major places. Much of the traffic is people going home or returning, not vacationers. Ma and Pa Kettle don't up and go to Uruguay. And if they were to connect it would be through MIA or JFK, which have ample SA operations.
:lol: Can't resist THIS ONE! Ma and Pa Kettle wouldn't know Uruguay from Planet Hollywood. Unfortunately Tempe is pretty much in the League of Kettles too. Most of the South American destinations have restrictive bilaterals that prevent anyone from starting service at the drop of a hat. Of all the places that I have travelled around the globe, South America is one of the most diverse, interesting continents. Europe will always be Europe and is a haven for history buffs, intellects and romantics, but the countries of South America are some of the most intriguing on the planet. Highly encourage ANYONE to visit this part of the world......well, maybe NOT the Kettle's. (Orlando is still a BIG Trip for them :lol: )
 
:unsure: Are you talking about the Carribbean, or South America? You might stretch an Airbus narrowbody to Central America, but not South America, and if so, not any of the major places. Much of the traffic is people going home or returning, not vacationers. Ma and Pa Kettle don't up and go to Uruguay. And if they were to connect it would be through MIA or JFK, which have ample SA operations.
Bogota, Quito and Caracas are within the published range of the 319 or 320. Rio, Sao Paulo, Lima, Buenos Aires and Montevideo (Uraguay) are not. Nothing in the inventory short of an A330 (332 or 333) would be able to make any of those cities.
 
Where is US Airways in all the merger talk?

With all the rumor talk circulating so far in 2008, where does US Airways stand? Led by CEO Doug Parker, the airline has been a staunch proponent of consolidation, though his carrier has largely been left out of most scenarios that have been the subject of public speculation recently. The Financial Times points out that Parker "was the architect of the last deal involving a U.S. legacy carrier when, in 2005, as chief executive of America West he led the deal to acquire US Airways, then in bankruptcy. He tried to buy another bankrupt rival, Delta Air Lines, last year before that company rejected Mr. Parker's unsolicited bid."

So, now, where is US Airways in the latest round of merger talk? The Times says that while he is "undeterred," Parker also "said he was a realist on US Airways' role in consolidation now that all of his peers have emerged from credit protection." Parker tells the Times that US Airways -– along with Northwest –- may be too small to spearhead a merger now that rivals are out of bankruptcy. United, despite efforts, has been unsuccessful in finding a merger partner. Other rivals, such as Continental, appear to be content to stand alone unless other rivals act first.

"That leaves one, Delta," Parker tells the Times, while pointing out that his former takeover target is now trading at a value of about $4 billion. Delta executives claimed the airline would be worth as much as $8 billion at the time they worked to reject US Airways' overatures. "There's pressure on them from shareholders to do something," Parker says. As for US Airways, The Street.com writes that Avondale Partners analyst Bob McAdoo "says that even though it isn't anybody's initial option, US Airways remains a strong merger candidate. It's always good to have slots and gates at congested airports in desirable markets like Boston, New York and Washington, he says." Stay tuned …
 

Latest posts

Back
Top