I'm not a US employee.
My wife & I live near PHL & we fly US, mostly TA to LGW, MAD, & SNN along with some excursions to places like PBI, PHX, SFO, or SAN. We both work, & have devised a strategy for destination travel which confers elite FF status (we both snag CP with last years promotion and I will do some extra flights this year to keep QM for CP next year). Our point of view is from the pax perspective as people who fly a great deal with US.
I'm intrigued by this thread as it is about customer service, airline cost-saving, employee relationships & policy issues. My wife and I both work in the healthcare field as nurse anesthetists. As such, we can completely relate to Pitbull's comments about burdensome, disjointed stratas of procedural-driven management who often impede workflow and the implementation of quality service. As desertgal points out, ultimately the job is the job and one is indeed accountable for what they do apart from the procedural mavens or recalcitrant co-workers.
I can also see how ghost riders may be both informational or intrusive to the process. They are however a necessary evil, and I would guess that how good or evil depends upon that individual and how they interpret the process and their responsibility.
So I'm kind of puzzled/bemused to learn that US is actually pondering a one cup vs. whole can strategy on certain flights. I tend to agree with those who say give the pax the entire can, especially on those TC flights where time is long and throats parched. Likewise, I just don't see this as being the area which makes or breaks an airline. A modicum of service can generate a ton of goodwill without costing an arm or leg.
In general, we have been very satisfied with US, the FAs, and the service that we receive flying US. Of course, we've been purchasing B fares or qulifying H,M,Qs for the TA upgrades, so one would expect the product and cabin experience to be good. Likewise our domestic flying is either via E-UG or sitting in the "good" coach section. In any case, we've overheard some FA conversations which air out the dirty laundry and differences between FAs. We ourselves take it with a grain of salt as it often sounds like our own jobs working in the OR ( with the exception that when get a complaining patient, we need only push more anesthetic & they stop bothering us 🙄 ).
In any case, no job is perfect, but it all comes down to trying to do the job to the best of your ability, even when managers co-workers, or pax make it difficult. And US east in our observation usually does so. I assume the same is true on the west side, and we will see first hand when we fly to OGG this summer.
So what should pax like ourselves expect and look for when we fly US in terms of service? I'm not the complaining type, but I do frequently send some remarks/observations to CA -- most usually complementing service somewhere along the chain of command ranging from check-in to the Club, to FAs etc. If I know what to look for as a pax, I'm happy to provide insight and feedback to CA which might also serve as a complimentary ghost rider. I kind of feel like I've got an interest in letting management know how we pax feel about things as US slowly unifies services and procedures. They've got to know what works and what doesn't.
regards,
Barry