This announcement is just a way to have the airlines' stocks go up in value. That's all.
wrong
This announcement is just a way to have the airlines' stocks go up in value. That's all.
Gilding,
The key to US's offer is that the unsecured creditors will come out with something instead of nothing as is typical in bankruptcy exits. That's the key piece that will force DL mgmt's hand. They're going to have to develop a more robust plan than they initially anticipated. That could be a good thing for the long term health of the company. On the other hand, that also provides time for the pirahnas to put together other bids...
UScareways Sucks, big time
UScareways Sucks, big time
And look for just how much praise there will be for our illustrious management team when Charlotte is drastically reduced (both in flights and in employment...no training center for pilots, flight attendants, or customer service, no trans-Atlantic flights, etc), PIT employment further dwindles to nothing with OCC moving to ATL, PHL employees are scattered when that station is reduced and int'l service is cut in favor of JFK, PHX loses HQ status and 75 year old DL flight attendants move in to Sky Harbor bumping the most senior HPers out of their lines of flying.U is not evil, Doug is not evil. Look at DAL, poor mgmt, poor poor poor...and if you notice only a small percentage of the masses are complaining, it is just that we choose to remember what is negative. I hear more comments daily about how HP/US saved their family and lives.
U/HP started with AC investing only $75 million and when it was over there was over $1 BILLION 5 months later when the deal was signed.
With respect.....
While I would partially agree with WT that this hostile takeover might not ever be consumated, I completely disagree with WT on the antitrust issue.
As I've posted numerous times (usually on threads where individuals who aren't lawyers lecture us on how the DOJ would never allow AA to buy NW), it ain't 2000 anymore. The LCCs have grown into very large airlines with plans to continue growing. Since demand for air travel has not kept up with their growth, someone needs to shrink, and that someone happens to be the six high-cost legacy airlines.
And look for just how much praise there will be for our illustrious management team when Charlotte is drastically reduced (both in flights and in employment...no training center for pilots, flight attendants, or customer service, no trans-Atlantic flights, etc), PIT employment further dwindles to nothing with OCC moving to ATL, PHL employees are scattered when that station is reduced and int'l service is cut in favor of JFK, PHX loses HQ status and 75 year old DL flight attendants move in to Sky Harbor bumping the most senior HPers out of their lines of flying.
No, this is going to be ugly--both for DL and US/HP. Doogie has lost his mind. If you think there is a big culture difference between US & HP, just wait till all of Georgia gets added into the mix. When its over, NONE involved will love to fly and it will definitely show.
Actually, US has lined up over $7B in financing to refinance all the DIP loans, so there will be no issue at all with the DIP banks.I totally agree with you. Likely, in order to approve the bankruptcy plan, US will recognize that they need to pay out more to the unsecured creditors than they would receive if there was not a merger in bankruptcy. But what about the financing received during bankruptcy???
Those banks will be harder to win over. Obviously, it is very difficult to convince a bank to provide financing to a bankrupt airline. They are unsecured creditors as well; but the bankruptcy code places these banks in a 'preference category' so that 'debtor in possession' financing is possible. So although they are unsecured, they would be one of the first creditors paid under the plan... meaning they will receive more than just pennies on the dollar.
So US will need to think of creative ways to encourage the 'preference debtor-in-possession' class to approve of the new merger bankruptcy plan. I suppose their first effort would be to include post-bankruptcy financing plans that are favorable to those banks. Of course, this point could be moot if those DIP financing banks, after doing risk-assessment, are able to determine that 2 mergers and a bankruptcy is less risky than 1 merger and a bankruptcy.