L
luvn737s
Guest
Have most pilots forgotten (or did they ever know) why the pay scale was set where it was when they started? It wasn't generousity, it was the power of the unions. Now, when they are called on to defend their profession from corporate slashing to makeup for incompetence, they capitulate, hoping to hold onto what little is left. Had the pilots of the 50's, 60's and 70's been as spineless, the pay rates today would be much closer to a municipal bus driver.
Pundits say that pilots are more cooperative because they have so much more to lose than other rank-and-file employees. That of course makes no sense. But I think that pilots have lost sight of just what they have to lose. Under the guise of "reality" they are lead to believe that the changes in the industry are beyond their control and that they need to be proactive (concessionary) to defend what little is left. "RJ's are here, JetBlue has a backlog of applications and a pilot job just ain't what it used to be" are repeated enough to become an acceptable substitute for the truth.
So now who stands up for the airline profession? The F/A's, the mechanics and rampers are carrying water for the pilots. Anyone who fails to see the war zone that exists in airline-labor relations is bound to become a victim of it one way or another. The Christmas meltdown was a watershed event that signaled the first defensive salvos in the war that management has decided to wage on it's own employees. Just as airlines have had to adjust to the new "realities" of it's market, passengers will either have to acclimate to a new and much less reliable level of service or choose carriers based on service reputation. Service that won't come with the $39 ticket.
This battle will not be without casualties (in the emotional, business and financial sense, of course). But it is a battle worth fighting, both out of respect for those who fought before and those who will choose to follow.
Pundits say that pilots are more cooperative because they have so much more to lose than other rank-and-file employees. That of course makes no sense. But I think that pilots have lost sight of just what they have to lose. Under the guise of "reality" they are lead to believe that the changes in the industry are beyond their control and that they need to be proactive (concessionary) to defend what little is left. "RJ's are here, JetBlue has a backlog of applications and a pilot job just ain't what it used to be" are repeated enough to become an acceptable substitute for the truth.
So now who stands up for the airline profession? The F/A's, the mechanics and rampers are carrying water for the pilots. Anyone who fails to see the war zone that exists in airline-labor relations is bound to become a victim of it one way or another. The Christmas meltdown was a watershed event that signaled the first defensive salvos in the war that management has decided to wage on it's own employees. Just as airlines have had to adjust to the new "realities" of it's market, passengers will either have to acclimate to a new and much less reliable level of service or choose carriers based on service reputation. Service that won't come with the $39 ticket.
This battle will not be without casualties (in the emotional, business and financial sense, of course). But it is a battle worth fighting, both out of respect for those who fought before and those who will choose to follow.
well said. the nature of today's management is to push aggressively until it becomes clear to them that those tactics are costing them more than they are gaining. ugly as it was, the us sickout/meltdown may have been the shot heard 'round the industry...