Professor: Why should unions cooperate?
By Steve Halvonik
TRIBUNE-REVIEW
Friday, July 30, 2004
There is a simple reason why US Airways' unions aren't cooperating with the company's attempt to negotiate $800 million in wage and benefits reductions, some observers say.
There is no incentive, said Marick Masters, a University of Pittsburgh business professor who is writing an academic paper about the airline's labor relations.
"I think they regard the situation as a fait accompli," Masters said. "The airline holds all of the cards one way or another and they're going to do what they have to do to reduce employee costs. So why should employees cooperate?"
Indeed, a look at the Communications Workers of America's Internet site seems to confirm Masters' theory. Featured about halfway down the page is a color picture of David S. Bronner, US Airways' chairman, accompanied by the quotation, "We will restructure the airline with or without the employees."
Although that quotation is several months' old, its lingering presence on the CWA's Web site illustrates "the legacy of distrust" that still exists between management and labor, in spite of Chief Executive Bruce Lakefield's attempts to improve relations, Marick said.
"That now-famous remark by Dr. Bronner has been interpreted to mean that management has a plan to declare bankruptcy for a second time," the CWA's Web site said. "That means they could change the employment contracts without a vote of the employees."
It was Lakefield who recently accused the unions of seeking bankruptcy reorganization. A bankruptcy filing would permit US Airways to void all of its union contracts and cancel or alter employee pension and medical plans -- something Lakefield's predecessor David Siegel avoided during the airline's bankruptcy reorganization from August 2002 to March 2003.
"Please stop dragging your feet of hoping that Chapter 11 will help you," Lakefield warned union leaders in a recorded message made available to employees. "It most certainly will not."
US Airways, the nation's seventh-largest airline, is seeking $800 million in wage and benefits givebacks from employees as part of a $1.5 billion cost-cutting plan aimed at restoring the company to profitability. Lakefield has warned employees that if new labor agreements are not in place before Sept. 30, the company would likely file bankruptcy and be liquidated -- putting 31,000 jobs in jeopardy, including more than 7,000 in Western Pennsylvania.
A bankruptcy filing could be advantageous to employees if other airlines stepped in to acquire US Airways or its pieces. The company reiterated on Tuesday that it would not sell assets to stay afloat, setting the stage for bankruptcy if new labor agreements are not reached.
In spite of Lakefield's increasingly dire threats, there have been no negotiating breakthroughs. The pilots' union is still actively talking with the company, but CWA negotiations ended after one day on Tuesday.
"Our people just don't have the confidence that the new business plan is going to work," said Chris Fox, president of CWA Local 13302 in Pittsburgh.
Talks with the flight attendants' union also began on Tuesday. But a fourth union -- the International Association of Machinist and Aerospace Workers -- has refused to reopen its contract.
Masters said he believed that IAM negotiators were being pressured by the international board to stand firm and refuse to grant any concessions to US Airways that could be used against the union by another airline.
Masters said that US Airways' "our way or the highway'' stance left union negotiators with little room to maneuver.
"There's nothing for union leadership to benefit from negotiations unless it believes it can reduce the magnitude of wage and benefits cuts," Masters said.
Steve Halvonik can be reached at shalvonik@tribweb.com or (412) 320-7993.
Back to headlines