WSJ Article about AAL's novel no bankruptcy strategy

Wretched Wrench

Veteran
Apr 21, 2003
1,626
12
Airline CEO's
Novel Strategy:
No Bankruptcy

By MELANIE TROTTMAN
April 17, 2006; Page B1

Gerard Arpey has been slashing costs and grabbing for more revenue ever since he abruptly became chief executive of American Airlines and its AMR Corp. parent three years ago.

He has yanked pillows out of planes, halted some unprofitable flights, and crammed more seats into coach in a quest to restore his company to profitability. He recently shelved a more draconian experiment to make customers pay for soft drinks, but most of his efforts have succeeded in helping boost revenue and lower costs at the world's largest airline. "Yes, I am relentless about change or continuous improvement," he said in an interview last week. "But I don't think I'm mean about it."


Still, by many measures Mr. Arpey is losing ground against leaner competitors who have shaved their debt and cut costs to levels below those at American.

The irony is that he might have an easier time if not for something he played a key role in averting three years ago: a bankruptcy filing.

In April 2003, American's board turned to Mr. Arpey -- then president and chief operating officer -- to rescue disastrous labor negotiations after former CEO Don Carty resigned amid an uproar over hiding executive bonuses. American had been asking union employees to take pay cuts and was within hours of filing bankruptcy when Mr. Arpey stepped in to help finalize the crucial labor deals.

Mr. Arpey, a driven 47-year-old executive, who started at American in 1982 as a financial analyst, said he took action so American could control its own destiny. "Bankruptcy, by definition, really puts the problem in the hands of somebody else," he said. His intent is to "ingrain into the fabric of this company that to be successful we have to work together (with unions) or we will fail ultimately."

Since that labor deal, most of American's other major competitors have filed for bankruptcy, allowing them to extract deeper cuts from labor unions and shed debt by shortchanging creditors, lowering lease rates for aircraft and airport gates, and getting rid of unneeded planes. Some have even dumped costly employee pension obligations onto the federal government.

Now, Mr. Arpey is starting to face the first of these newly streamlined competitors at a time when experts say low costs matter more than ever for success. US Airways Group Inc. emerged from bankruptcy court last fall as part of a merger with America West Airlines, and United's UAL Corp. parent exited bankruptcy earlier this year with an innovative business plan. Executives at Delta Air Lines and Northwest Airlines, the latest two big airlines to enter court, are working to eventually emerge with less financial baggage. American is also facing increasing competition from growing low-cost carriers such as Southwest Airlines and JetBlue Airways.

American now has the distinction of being the only one of the six largest traditional U.S. airlines that has never filed for bankruptcy-court protection. American's CEO, however, complains that bankruptcy filings are allowing rivals an unfair financial advantage.

Consider how American is faring compared to United, an airline that Mr. Arpey calls a "formidable competitor." In its three years in bankruptcy court, United, a slightly smaller airline, was able to reduce its employee wages and benefits by about $2.5 billion annually, compared with American's reduction of about $1.8 billion since Mr. Arpey's appointment. And because of its bankruptcy filing, United saved $650 million a year in payments by terminating its pension plan, while American continues to fund its program to the tune of $310 million last year and $250 million this year.

American is banking that there is an upside to staying out of bankruptcy court: better employee relations. Bankruptcy court wrecked other airlines' labor relations by forcing concessions down workers' throats.

At American, by contrast, managers have worked closely with employees to uncover bloated costs and other inefficiencies, building stronger bonds with unions whose leaders now sit in on monthly meetings with management to review company financials and brainstorm. "If folks are not truly your business partners, they will undermine your strategy," said Mr. Arpey.

Last year, while some other airline CEOs were in the midst of nasty spats with embittered unions, Mr. Arpey was applauded by American's unions for joining them on a pension-reform lobbying trip to Washington D.C. where he slept in the same college dorm rooms they occupied.

"He loves this airline just like the rest of us. He is honest and he is open," said Dennis Burchette, president of Transport Workers Union Local 514, which represents 7,000 mechanics at American's largest maintenance base in Tulsa, Okla. Still, Mr. Burchette estimates that up to 30% of mechanics at his job site remain skeptical about management.

Since Mr. Arpey took the helm three years ago, employee productivity has risen about 20%, expenses per seat-mile excluding fuel have dropped by about the same amount, and the airline has raised its cash reserves substantially to $4.3 billion at the end of last year. Investors have applauded. AMR's share price has risen seven-fold, far more than any other major carrier, during Mr. Arpey's tenure as CEO.

Mr. Arpey plans to keep pushing. "The key when you're in rough water: Don't ever take an oar out of the water," he said. "Always have a destination. Don't ever let the river take you."

To stay focused, he's banned cellphones and BlackBerrys from weekly executive committee meetings that can last into the night. "I lock them all in a room once a week on Tuesday," he said of his executive team. And at any point during the meeting, he might ask a finance executive a marketing question or a marketing executive a technology question. "I'm the first among equals," he said. "When we leave that room, I want everyone paddling in the same direction even if they disagree."

It doesn't stop there. Mr. Arpey also began requiring his executive team to complete individual "scorecards" each month with a fresh list of strategies or tactics from their departments to help the company cut costs. This was his way of refusing to let management make labor unions the scapegoat for the company's problems, he said, and it worked so well he expanded it to include ideas on boosting revenue. One suggestion the company implemented: a recommendation from the in-flight service group that the airline sell advertising on its napkins.

But some analysts worry that American has gathered up much of the low-hanging fruit and will have increasing difficulty competing with airlines with lower costs. Mr. Arpey believes he and his team can keep the airline competitive.

That won't come easily. In addition to the $20 billion in debt American plans to start paying down this year, it faces $600 million in increased non-fuel related costs this year, including higher salaries and benefits, pension expense and airport rent and landing fees. The airline said it has identified a hodgepodge of cost-savings worth $700 million, such as further reducing the time and cost of maintaining certain aircraft. At the same time, American said it has revenue-generating initiatives worth $300 million for this year, such as charging $25 for confirmed standby on flights.

Despite the daunting task, it's not all straight-faced at the airline these days. When Mr. Arpey recently re-hired his former chief financial officer Tom Horton to an expanded position from AT&T Inc., he gave him a playful "to do" list of about seven things. Last on the list: "AMR Unprofitable. Please Fix."
 
Management’s responsibility is always to protect shareholder interests. AMR should be commended for being agile enough to negotiate the demons of the airline industry… and AA employees should be grateful that they gave enough the first time and should very likely not have to give again.

AA does have some real disadvantages but they aren’t insurmountable. The biggest advantage AA has is its ability to swiftly move should consolidation or asset sales come up. The comments that the focus for the next year will shift to debt repayment indicates that there may be a recognition that AA will need to grow the Pacific on its own if it wants in anytime soon.
 
Arpey and the Union leadership team need to question the floor Supervisor's who spend company resources to keep overhaul shops confined to straight day shift operations.

We have turbine building shops in Tulsa that purchase equipment and tooling when the same equipment and tooling we currently have is only used 8 hours per day 5 days a week. Work has been brought in, production limits on a days only operation have been squeezed. What do they do? Go buy more equipment and spend resources instead of starting a second shift.

This back asswards approach is done to insure that supervisor and overhaul personel can remain on straight day shifts with weekends off.

Somehow, Some way, the top leaders of this company that are looking for ways to cut cost, need to get in direct contact with the lower level group. And the lower level group needs to speak up and expose these morons that are costing a fortune and are not held accountable.

How do they expect us to seriously consider that cost need to be cut, when lower level management gladly spends with complete abandon to serve themselves? Oh, and don't forget the Inspectors, Mechanics, Machinist, ect. that gladly ride along saying nothing so that they too can keep their day shift and weekends off going.
 
Informer, you make a good point. Too many low guys don't have anywhere to complain (since they'd be complaining to the featherbedder themself) and it's kind of taboo to rat out a fellow union guy's great shift opportunity. From an upper mgmt perspective I've seen people try to reduce this at the TWA overhaul base (before AA bought them) and mgmt was scared to upset the troops and the troops were scared of upsetting their brothers, and the morons in mgmt there were doing things as if the company was flush in cash...
 
Informer, you make a good point. Too many low guys don't have anywhere to complain (since they'd be complaining to the featherbedder themself) and it's kind of taboo to rat out a fellow union guy's great shift opportunity. From an upper mgmt perspective I've seen people try to reduce this at the TWA overhaul base (before AA bought them) and mgmt was scared to upset the troops and the troops were scared of upsetting their brothers, and the morons in mgmt there were doing things as if the company was flush in cash...


I have already made my "union brother" enemies by running this up the flag pole to date. Supervisor creating his little straight day shift empire after coming in from a three shift work area where he had to rotate.

They sure put alot of pressure to keep quiet, when in fact, this type of stupidity is what cost them concessions already and likely their defined pensions in the future.

But hey, "they got theirs brother". Straight days and weekends off, everyone else be damned. They are 90% TWU supporters and claim AMFA guys are all about themselves. :rolleyes: