Think what you will of ALPA. But this battle has more to do with failure on the east's part concerning the arbitration award than with ALPA National. You see the east was never really able to summon the necessary unity to oust ALPA in the past. Even in light of serious setbacks. LOA 93 is one example. What I believe has transpired is simply this... The east believed in all their hearts that their position of DOH in the negotiations, mediation and subsequent arbitration was more than sufficient to satisfy their masses. Especially in light of their recent losses suffered during their two bankruptcies. So it is only logical to believe that there may have been, and in most respects still is, an air of petition concerning restitution for the crimes committed against this pilot group. The problem lies in the fact that the AWA pilots had nothing to do with their plight prior to this merger and any suggestion to the contrary is supremely ignorant. While the east seeks some form of restitution (and who would blame them) the west is left to defend what they believe is their fair share in this new endeavor. DOH, righteous in the east's mind, is nothing more than the east demanding some action to once again make them whole, or at least as whole as possible. When Nicolau made the award public and the east learned they would not receive the recompense they believed they were entitled to they reacted. USAPA is nothing more than this reaction fully realized. USAPA is not about representing all pilots on this property. USAPA is the means by which the east will try to extract payment for crimes committed by past managements. Their motto says it all. "Seniority Matters." I question just whose seniority they are talking about when they speak of lifetime fences etc. I question the idea that the process by which the award was determined is at fault as the east never previously rose to level of rhetoric we witness today. In fact the east participated in the merger policy change in the early 90's. Frankly, I find all this rather transparent. In the end USAPA will ultimately fail. In fact it can never truly be successful. I believe this because whether USAPA finds itself bankrupt due to litigation or the USAPA faithful find themselves outnumbered at some future date the end result is the same. In the end USAPA will fail. It will fail because as much as its constituents want us to believe it conducts itself more like a true union, or it is simply more democratic, it was never born out of a desire for real change. It was born out of conflict. It was born out of greed.
With all due respects, welcome to labor unionism 101. This is THEE message everyone in ALPA is about to get....either we come up with a NATIONAL standard to value an employee, in relation to his/her peers, that makes rational, logical, sense among an educated (about unionism) people, or this will continue to happen.
USAPA failed to TWICE get +3,200 cards, NO? YES!
USAPA failed to get a representational election, NO, YES!
USAPA failed to get all the services necessary PLUS some to BETTER ALPA's services, NO? YES!
And NOW USAPA has bad leadership and will FAIL to be a TRUE union, NO!
If YOU CHOOSE TO GO "UNREPRESENTED" and try to destroy USAPA, you will only do ONE person a diservice...YOURSELF!
We will NOT vote for anything with Nicolau in it....IT IS DEMOCRACY and whether YOU, and hear me well, YOU, MEANING ALL UNION PILOTS, fail to understand that if it WON'T PASS THE VOTE....that is DEMOCRACY and the MEC'S and ALPA Nationals FAILURE TO UNDERSTAND THIS PRINCIPLE IS WHAT GOT THEM INTO THIS PICKLE.
This is why ALPA NATIONAL DOES NOT LIKE MEMBERSHIP RATIFICATION!
More "sour grapes" from the cheap seats as far as this forum is concerned.....
ALPA motto "safety first". You CAN'T HAVE ANYTHING FIRST, INCLUDING SAFETY, IF THE OTHER UNION GROUPS ARE FAVORED OVER YOUR OWN....AND I DON'T MEAN WITH FINANCIAL SUPPORT.
PATTERN BARGAINING IS A LOSING PROPOSITION......HOW ABOUT A NATIONAL SOS??
THAT'S UNION GREED....remember, when ONE PILOT HAS A PROBLEM, WE ALL HAVE A PROBLEM? OR HOW ABOUT "WE'RE TAKING IT BACK!" Right....off the BACKS OF THE OLDER WORKERS, just like BRANIFF, EASTERN, PAN AM and others.
Let me tell you I have been an ALPA member for 23 years and was a STAUNCH ALPA supporter UNTIL National FAILED to protect us, US Airways pilots, ALWAYS THE TIP OF THE SPEAR, when our pension was STRIPPED from us....a precursor of things to come for our MAJOR ALPA carriers. Now look....
Do ALL OF US A FAVOR, and this goes for ALL PILOTS ON THIS FORUM, REREAD THESE HISTORIES THOUROUGHLY and come back here again:
Flying the Line Volume 1
Flying the Line Volume 2
The History of the APA
http://www.alliedpilots.org/Public/AboutAP...und/history.asp
http://www.alliedpilots.org/Public/Publica.../2003_fallp.pdf
I close with this: Interview with Captain Richard "J.R." Lyons, founding father of APA:
Flightline: Why did you and your colleagues believe that creating an independent union was in the best interests of the
pilots of American Airlines?
Captain Lyons: “So that we would have more control over our own destiny. ALPA refused to sign a contract which had been agreed to by our Master Executive Council, the Company and the Flight Engineers group.â€
Flightline: Do you believe these reasons remain valid today?
Captain Lyons: “Yes. Why should we get back in the barrel?â€
Flightline: Did you ever have any second thoughts about leaving ALPA and creating APA?
Captain Lyons: “No.â€
The APA History is very revealing...it is information you'll NOT get from ALPA.