WeAAsles
Veteran
- Joined
- Oct 20, 2007
- Messages
- 25,949
- Reaction score
- 5,344
You see readers. This is reason you get the little paranoia bug in your heads. BS like this.Tim Nelson said:I can't imagine any of the thousands of United AIrline members being laid off will ever be pro union again with how Delaney's group treated them. But IAM141 isn't the only one that has failed union members and tied in with management.
Tim knows full well and I've covered it before what the scenario was over at UAL. The former Continental employees and stations had NO protection language against being outsourced prior to the TA that they ratified.
The position for UAL management was simple. Take it or leave it but those stations are closing no matter what! So the proposal was accepted to be brought back to the membership and recommended for passage that gave those people at least something, other than nothing at all. If you don't already have a union and a contract that has SCOPE language this is what you get. (Remember contracts under the RLA don't expire, they only become amendable)
But Tim would like you to believe that you are in the same position that UAL was. Ohhhhh so far from the truth. You have a union and you have a contract. And when we go into joint talks we BOTH have unions and we BOTH have contracts. And they both have station staffing protections so the UAL scenario is not and will not be a factor period.
But hey if Tim tells you the truth it takes away the big gun he's trying to shoot you with. So he just keeps throwing it out there over and over knowing for some of you it might just stick. Good way to connive a few votes I guess.