Once again you are being dishonest:Tim Nelson said:I said he was interesting. I haven't judged him much farther than that. If you believe all of the things you say about him then why do you talk to him as well?
Did you talk to dues objectors? I show everyone respect, even those who I disagree with almost entirely. Unlike you, I don't call people POS if they are not my favorite.
Show us the proposals! And stop talking about a release now. STOP IT!700UW said:Once again you are being dishonest:
Lets see you said I smoke crack, you called many on here stupid, drunks, bong hitters.
Hey Roa,
What else did he call you?
Yep the members want someone who attacks and insults the very members they want to represent.Tim Nelson said:Show us the Freakn Proposals from the union and the company? WTH?
The union moved downward as well. Our members need to see exactly what is being proposed and need our leaders to finally put the "Release" Bong down. Nobody is getting released, most already knew that but now it is settled.
you mean like Mr Klemm?700UW said:Once again, what you quoted has NOTHING to do with your reply.
Ask Delaney.
And you are a hypocrite and you lied.
Own up to it.
Look right here:
Yep the members want someone who attacks and insults the very members they want to represent.
NOT!
Same district.700UW said:This is about US, not Klemm and UA.
Tim said he doesnt call people names, we all know that is an outright lie.
http://www.airlineforums.com/topic/56294-novdec-2013-fleet-service-discussion/?p=1048353here's a simple one for you
based on what you and all of us have seen do you trust the upper leadership and Delaney? a simple yes or no please
http://www.airlineforums.com/topic/56294-novdec-2013-fleet-service-discussion/?p=1049032Not my district, was a member of 141 years ago before the split, so it doesnt concern me.
700 just doesnt want to admit.blue collar said:Rat's dues money goes towards klemm's pay. I'd say it concerns him.
Will they recommend "vote no"?Tim Nelson said:700 just doesnt want to admit.
At any rate, team delaney is close to bringing back a ta that has less wage than amr and gave up scope increases while at the same time agreeing to more days off.
they are mixed. But i believe they will recommend for it. They are close. Im not saying that is a good thing because my biggest gripe was enhancing scope over days off. They agreed to take all scope increases off the table? Wth? I told you guys.737823 said:Will they recommend "vote no"?Josh
Tim Nelson said:they are mixed. But i believe they will recommend for it. They are close. Im not saying that is a good thing because my biggest gripe was enhancing scope over days off. They agreed to take all scope increases off the table. Wth? I told you guys.
looks like days off may be the big winner here as we leave off meaningful scope. Small stations may get screwed again