Phoenix
Veteran
- Joined
- Apr 16, 2003
- Messages
- 8,584
- Reaction score
- 7,430
Uncharted... But we now have the APA, the company, and the NMB, all sending letters back and forth to each other, regarding the SLI dispute... And Marty Harper ain't one of the addressees. Not even once, by anyone.A320 Driver said:I agree. It looks early to me. MOU says 90 days from the POR to make the request. But the MOU doesn't provide for our current circumstance, namely, no SLI protocol agreement. And no one could have anticipated Judge Silver's assertion that USAPA cannot represent the US Airways pilots in SLI arbitration after single carrier status is granted OR the APA jumping on her bandwagon trying to go around what was obviously the intentions of the parties going into the MOU. Here we are again in uncharted territory. What we need, IMO, is someone to study Delta/Northwest and United/Continental to come up with a reasonable guide to what we can expect out of arbitration and see what such a list would look like. I'd like to know.
Added to that, the company, by its own admission (the "neutral company") is chastising USAPA, in front of the NMB, for refusing to sign over its representational rights to its adversary in this dispute.. An adversary that is known for it's predatory nature, and for which cause the MB protections were written into law.
How can the NMB, observe, correspond, and recognize the disputing parties, and then preside over an arbitration that inherently eliminates one of the parties, or includes additional parties not presently acknowledged?