Dave (Mo),
It’s been a little while since we’ve engaged, but it looks like you’re still telling the same lies! Let’s first chat about the “force majeure” at Northwest. Unfortunately, good men and women lost their jobs, the problem is that the first one was because of 9-11, some two years ago and AMFA’s crack legal staff has just recently secured dates for it even to be heard. That being said, the loss of jobs had been initiated before the “force majeure”. When AMFA signed the 38% farm out language, NWA ‘s eyes were wide open, they knew they could manhandle AMFA because they didn’t have the experience not to enter into a foolish agreement regarding outsourcing. As twuer pointed out, AMFA even admitted that this was the first time this language had been used. Why do you think everyone else had stayed away from it? It’s because it’s easily manipulated. Thousands of the layoffs at NWA are direct results of AMFA’s inability to write effective language. If the 38% (of labor dollars) was the right way to go, why did outsourcing immediately go up when the contract was signed? And will you quit already with the numbers! That’s a losing argument for you! You are adding numbers from groups that aren’t in M&R. If we, on the TWU side did that in regards to NWA, the numbers would go up dramatically. And the numbers you posted on the insurance are completely misleading. That document was from a proposal given to the Presidents council, after which the company realized they used the wrong formula. We have a contractual cap on our insurance benefit, read it and quit lying in hopes of getting someone to believe your crap. With regard to your posts about Mr. Little’s interpretation of the constitution, you may not like it but the TWU’s legal interpretation and implementation has been tested for several years and as recently as the 562 law suit. Now argue with a district court will you please? It’s your right wing views Dave, that will spell doom for AMFA. As far as your “without further ratification”, you imply that the contract was NOT ratified by the membership when in fact it was. Once again, argue with the district court judge, who agreed with the TWU’s position. I know Dave, the judges are crooked, right? So why would you want to let one decide the fate of your contract? You may not like “without further ratification”, but at least we don’t have Delle telling us what votes from the convention will be “null and void”. Or will you deny that too! Local 33 had to sue Delle for showing us exactly how much democracy is in AMFA, exactly NONE!
P.S.
It’s no wonder you have 1600 posts Dave, I choose just to write one instead of ten at a time, but 1600 does look impressive in a years time….GET A LIFE!!!!!!!