Mrs. McFly
Advanced
- Joined
- May 21, 2008
- Messages
- 117
- Reaction score
- 18
There's that, and they could also perhaps claim that US's actions are interfering with the due-process for the bankruptcy proceedings.
The debtor is held to a fixed timeline for submitting a reorganization plan, which includes implementing changes within their control and by rejecting contracts.
US is in effect creating a serious diversion that will eventually force the debtor to stop focusing on the reorganization and deal with the distraction they are supposed to be free from during the exclusivity period.
If US isn't muzzled, I have to wonder if AMR might have a case to argue for extending exclusivity beyond the 2005 revision's limit of 18 months. The 18 months is there to protect the creditors from management prolonging the process. It wasn't intended to allow the creditors to preventing management from doing their job.
How does this development come into play? There are so many wheels spinning very quickly that it is hard to wrap your head around all of it.
http://www.businessweek.com/news/2012-04-24/us-airways-said-to-approach-amr-bondholders-on-merger