Amr Reports Second Quarter $58m Net Profit

eolesen

Veteran
Jul 23, 2003
15,988
9,428
AMR Corporation Reports a Second Quarter Profit of $58 Million Despite High Fuel Costs and Historically Low Ticket Prices
Continued Focus on Cost Control and Revenue Performance Produces American's First Quarterly Profit, Without Benefit of Special Items, Since the Fourth Quarter of 2000 American Targeting Continued Progress Toward Required Financial Performance
7/20/2005 8:33:15 AM


FORT WORTH, Texas, July 20, 2005 /PRNewswire-FirstCall via COMTEX/ -- AMR Corporation (AMR), the parent company of American Airlines, Inc., today reported a net profit of $58 million for the second quarter, or $0.30 per share fully diluted, compared to a net profit of $6 million (which included a $31 million benefit from special items), or $0.03 per share fully diluted, in the second quarter last year. The second quarter was the company's first profitable quarter, without the benefit of special items, since the fourth quarter of 2000.

"The fact that we were able to earn a small profit despite record high fuel prices and a difficult industry environment speaks volumes about our people, who continue to meet our many challenges with determination and ingenuity," said AMR Chairman and CEO Gerard Arpey.

"Working together, we have made significant progress in all aspects of the Turnaround Plan that we launched several years ago," Arpey said. "That progress has become even more crucial, given record high fuel prices that continue to afflict the industry."

During the second quarter, the Company paid $434 million more for fuel than it would have paid with last year's fuel prices.

"The high price of fuel remains one of the biggest clouds hanging over our company and our industry," Arpey said, "and unfortunately, there doesn't seem to be any relief in sight -- oil prices in the second half of the year are currently projected to be higher than during the second quarter. As a result, we have no choice but to redouble our efforts to wring cost and inefficiency out of everything we do."

American's mainline cost per available seat mile in the quarter was up 5.6 percent year over year. However, excluding fuel and last year's special items, the airline's unit cost was down 4.3 percent year over year. "This is a reflection of the many cost-saving initiatives we continue to find," Arpey said. "In addition to the $700 million in annual savings we built into our 2005 budget, our employees have identified -- since the beginning of this year -- another $65 million in expected annual savings on a steady-state basis."

American's revenue performance was buoyed by a combination of capacity restraint, network and aircraft changes, and record high traffic levels. During the second quarter, revenue passenger miles were up 7.4 percent year over year, while available seat miles grew 2.3 percent overall, and decreased 1.6 percent domestically. American's systemwide load factor -- or the percentage of total seats filled -- hit a record of 79.5 percent. Yield, which represents average fares, increased 1.9 percent year over year -- the company's first quarterly yield increase since the fourth quarter of 2003.

"The improvement we have seen on the revenue side of the ledger has only been possible as a result of our people's ability to efficiently and courteously handle an enormous number of customers," Arpey said. "At the same time, we are reaping the benefits of the many changes we have made to our network and product during the past several years. Our load factor is strong, and fares -- while still far too low to provide adequate returns -- have improved somewhat in recent months."

Arpey noted that after 17 quarters of losses, excluding special items, it feels good to report even a modest profit.

"I hope our people take pride in what we have accomplished together," Arpey said. "However, we need to be honest about the fact that -- given the losses of the past four years -- we are digging our way out of a very deep hole. What's more, given the strength of the economy and the public's current appetite for air travel, our second quarter results should be much better."

"High fuel prices are not an excuse," he said, "but they are a constant reminder that our industry is changing and we must change with it to ensure our future. Our competitors continue to lower their costs either in or outside of the bankruptcy court, and the currently improving fare levels are still low by historical standards."

Arpey pointed out that in addition to earning a modest profit, AMR was able to contribute $75 million to its various defined benefit pension plans in the second quarter, bringing its total contributions to the plans this year to $213 million. AMR also was able to grow its cash balance, ending the period with $3.9 billion in cash and short-term investments, including a restricted balance of $492 million.

Statements in this release contain various forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, which represent the Company's expectations or beliefs concerning future events. When used in this release, the words "expects," "plans," "anticipates," "indicates," "believes," "forecast," "guidance," "outlook" and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Forward- looking statements include, without limitation, the Company's expectations concerning operations and financial conditions, including changes in capacity, revenues and costs, future financing plans and needs, overall economic conditions, plans and objectives for future operations, and the impact on the Company of its results of operations in recent years and the sufficiency of its financial resources to absorb that impact. Other forward-looking statements include statements which do not relate solely to historical facts, such as, without limitation, statements which discuss the possible future effects of current known trends or uncertainties or which indicate that the future effects of known trends or uncertainties cannot be predicted, guaranteed or assured. All forward-looking statements in this release are based upon information available to the Company on the date of this release. The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward- looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise.

Forward-looking statements are subject to a number of factors that could cause the Company's actual results to differ materially from the Company's expectations. The following factors, in addition to other possible factors not listed, could cause the Company's actual results to differ materially from those expressed in forward-looking statements: changes in economic, business and financial conditions; the Company's substantial indebtedness; continued high fuel prices and the availability of fuel; further increases in the price of fuel; the impact of events in Iraq; conflicts in the Middle East or elsewhere; the highly competitive business environment faced by the Company, characterized by increasing pricing transparency and competition from low cost carriers and financially distressed carriers; historically low fare levels and fare simplification initiatives (both of which could result in a further deterioration of the revenue environment); the ability of the Company to reduce its costs further without adversely affecting operational performance and service levels; uncertainties with respect to the Company's international operations; changes in the Company's business strategy; actions by U.S. or foreign government agencies; the possible occurrence of additional terrorist attacks; another outbreak of a disease (such as SARS) that affects travel behavior; uncertainties with respect to the Company's relationships with unionized and other employee work groups; the inability of the Company to satisfy existing financial or other covenants in certain of its credit agreements; the availability and terms of future financing; the ability of the Company to reach acceptable agreements with third parties; and increased insurance costs and potential reductions of available insurance coverage. Additional information concerning these and other factors is contained in the Company's Securities and Exchange Commission filings, including but not limited to the 2004 Form 10-K.

Detailed financial information follows:



AMR CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in millions, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)

Three Months Ended June 30, Percent
2005 2004 Change

Revenues
Passenger - American Airlines $4,264 $3,895 9.5
- Regional Affiliates 561 505 11.1
Cargo 157 155 1.3
Other revenues 327 275 18.9
Total operating revenues 5,309 4,830 9.9

Expenses
Wages, salaries and benefits 1,671 1,703 (1.9)
Aircraft fuel 1,350 917 47.2
Other rentals and landing fees 319 301 6.0
Depreciation and amortization 286 320 (10.6)
Commissions, booking fees and
credit card expense 286 287 (0.3)
Maintenance, materials
and repairs 257 245 4.9
Aircraft rentals 147 153 (3.9)
Food service 127 139 (8.6)
Other operating expenses 637 600 6.2
Special charges --- (31) *
Total operating expenses 5,080 4,634 9.6

Operating Income 229 196 16.8

Other Income (Expense)
Interest income 29 14 *
Interest expense (223) (217) 2.8
Interest capitalized 24 20 20.0
Miscellaneous - net (1) (7) (85.7)
(171) (190) (10.0)

Income Before Income Taxes 58 6 *
Income tax --- --- ---
Net Earnings $58 $6 *

Earnings Per Share
Basic $0.35 $0.04
Diluted $0.30 $0.03

Number of Shares Used in
Computation
Basic 163 160
Diluted 216 183

* Greater than 100%



AMR CORPORATION
OPERATING STATISTICS
(Unaudited)

Three Months Ended
June 30, Percent
2005 2004 Change

American Airlines, Inc.
Mainline Jet Operations
Revenue passenger miles
(millions) 35,795 33,323 7.4
Available seat miles (millions) 45,018 43,997 2.3
Cargo ton miles (millions) 558 567 (1.6)
Passenger load factor 79.5% 75.7% 3.8 pts.
Passenger revenue yield per
passenger mile (cents) 11.91 11.69 1.9
Passenger revenue per available
seat mile (cents) 9.47 8.85 7.0
Cargo revenue yield per ton
mile (cents) 28.14 27.24 3.3
Operating expenses per available
seat mile, excluding Regional
Affiliates (cents) (A) 10.03 9.50 5.6
Fuel consumption (gallons,
in millions) 749 762 (1.7)
Fuel price per gallon (cents) 163.4 111.2 46.9

Regional Affiliates
Revenue passenger miles
(millions) 2,317 1,857 24.8
Available seat miles (millions) 3,211 2,665 20.5
Passenger load factor 72.2% 69.7% 2.5 pts.

AMR Corporation
Average Equivalent Number
of Employees
American Airlines 75,100 79,900
Other 13,400 12,600
Total 88,500 92,500

(A) Excludes $627 million and $517 million of expense incurred related
to Regional Affiliates in 2005 and 2004, respectively.



AMR CORPORATION
NON-GAAP AND OTHER RECONCILIATIONS
(Unaudited)

American Airlines, Inc. Mainline
Jet Operations Three Months Ended June 30,
(in millions, except as noted) 2005 2004

Total operating expenses $5,143 $4,698
Less: Operating expenses incurred related
to Regional Affiliates 627 517
Operating expenses excluding expenses
incurred related to Regional Affiliates $4,516 $4,181
American mainline jet operations available
seat miles 45,018 43,997

Operating expenses per available seat mile,
excluding Regional Affiliates (cents) 10.03 9.50

Less: Impact of special items (cents) --- (0.07)
Less: Fuel cost per available seat
mile (cents) 2.72 1.93
Operating expenses per available seat mile,
excluding impact of special items and the
cost of fuel (cents) 7.31 7.64

Percent change (4.3)%

AMR Corporation
Impact of Fuel Price Variance

Average fuel price per gallon (cents)
Three months ended June 30, 2005 164.2
Three months ended June 30, 2004 111.4
Change in price (cents) 52.8
2005 consumption (gallons, in millions) x 822.3

Impact of fuel price variance (in millions) $434.2

Note: The Company believes that operating expenses per available seat
mile, excluding special items (which relate to prior periods) and the
cost of fuel, as well as the impact of fuel price increases, assist
investors in understanding the impact of fuel prices on the Company's
operations.



AMR CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in millions, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)

Six Months Ended June 30, Percent
2005 2004 Change
Revenues
Passenger - American Airlines $8,106 $7,573 7.0
- Regional Affiliates 1,012 925 9.4
Cargo 308 303 1.7
Other revenues 633 541 17.0
Total operating revenues 10,059 9,342 7.7

Expenses
Wages, salaries and benefits 3,315 3,343 (0.8)
Aircraft fuel 2,448 1,725 41.9
Other rentals and landing fees 619 606 2.1
Depreciation and amortization 576 646 (10.8)
Commissions, booking fees and
credit card expense 557 575 (3.1)
Maintenance, materials and
repairs 492 476 3.4
Aircraft rentals 295 306 (3.6)
Food service 252 276 (8.7)
Other operating expenses 1,253 1,182 6.0
Special charges --- (31) *
Total operating expenses 9,807 9,104 7.7

Operating Income 252 238 5.9

Other Income (Expense)
Interest income 64 28 *
Interest expense (457) (429) 6.5
Interest capitalized 47 38 23.7
Miscellaneous - net (10) (35) (71.4)
(356) (398) (10.6)

Loss Before Income Taxes (104) (160) 35.0
Income tax --- --- *
Net Loss $(104) $(160) 35.0

Basic and Diluted Loss Per Share $(0.64) $(1.00)

Number of Shares Used in
Computation
Basic and Diluted 162 160

* Greater than 100%



AMR CORPORATION
OPERATING STATISTICS
(Unaudited)

Six Months Ended
June 30, Percent
2005 2004 Change
American Airlines, Inc.
Mainline Jet Operations
Revenue passenger miles
(millions) 68,123 63,613 7.1
Available seat miles (millions) 87,872 86,594 1.5
Cargo ton miles (millions) 1,098 1,088 0.9
Passenger load factor 77.5% 73.5% 4.0 pts.
Passenger revenue yield per
passenger mile (cents) 11.90 11.90 ---
Passenger revenue per available
seat mile (cents) 9.22 8.75 5.4
Cargo revenue yield per ton
mile (cents) 28.08 27.83 0.9
Operating expenses per
available seat mile, excluding
Regional Affiliates (cents) (A) 9.92 9.49 4.5
Fuel consumption (gallons,
in millions) 1,478 1,503 (1.7)
Fuel price per gallon (cents) 150.2 106.2 41.4

Regional Affiliates
Revenue passenger miles
(millions) 4,202 3,396 23.7
Available seat miles (millions) 6,126 5,118 19.7
Passenger load factor 68.6% 66.3% 2.3 pts.

(A) Excludes $1.2 billion and $1.0 billion of expense incurred related
to Regional Affiliates in 2005 and 2004, respectively.



AMR CORPORATION
NON-GAAP AND OTHER RECONCILIATIONS
(Unaudited)

American Airlines, Inc. Mainline
Jet Operations Six Months Ended June 30,
(in millions, except as noted) 2005 2004

Total operating expenses $9,924 $9,226
Less: Operating expenses incurred related
to Regional Affiliates 1,210 1,004
Operating expenses excluding expenses
incurred related to Regional Affiliates $8,714 $8,222
American mainline jet operations
available seat miles 87,872 86,594
Operating expenses per available seat
mile, excluding expenses incurred
related to Regional Affiliates (cents) 9.92 9.49


Current AMR Corp. news releases can be accessed via the Internet.
The address is http://www.aa.com


SOURCE AMR Corporation

Al Becker, Corporate Communications of AMR Corporation, +1-817-967-1577, or
[email protected]


http://www.prnewswire.com
 
jimntx said:
Now, it will be interesting to see how the other airlines did. We know that SWA make a pot full again.
[post="282798"][/post]​

CO also reported a profit, and it is pretty safe to say UA, NW, and DL won't. US Airways actually might, despite the fact they are in BK (they have before) and in major financial trouble, but I doubt it.
 
This is great news!!

Can't wait until this thread turns against management.

Thumbs up to Arpey!
 
My commendations to AA and CO. It shows it is possible to be profitable in the current environment despite very high fuel prices - something that WN couldn't have done were it not for their hedges.

It should be noted, however, that AA and CO have little exposure to LCCs at their largest and most profitable hubs - DFW and EWR respectively - while DL, US, and UA all have faced significant LCC competition in key markets; NW faces high losses yet has little LCC exposure which is doubly bad for them. It is just about a given that AA and CO will face increased LCC expansion as the Wright Amendment will fall, if not immediately then at least in stages. It is well known that CO has been making hand over fist at EWR and the LCCs are going to start moving into that market even at the risk of lengthy delays and higher costs.

So, AA and CO, enjoy your successes but recognize that there will probably be a more level playing field to compare AA and CO's performance against other carriers.
 
2Q05 Ex-Hedge Operating Margin: AMR 4.3%, WN 4.1%

2Q05 YOY RASM Change: AA +7.0%, WN -0.3%

Have a nice day.
 
Imagolfer said:
This is great news!!

Can't wait until this thread turns against management.

Thumbs up to Arpey!
[post="282813"][/post]​

And how much would we have made if Aprey didn't dump the fuel hedges? :eek: :eek:
 
TWU informer said:
About $700 Million for the QUARTER is my guess.
[post="282906"][/post]​

Close, I looked into it and it would of been just shy of a $800 million profit for the quarter. Imagine that, $800 million profit and labor is locked into concessions with no snapbacks. Too bad their master plan didn't work out so well. :p

I wonder if I would still have a job if I tossed away $750 million in a mere 3 months? :blink: :blink:
 
AMFAMAN said:
Close, I looked into it and it would of been just shy of a $800 million profit for the quarter. Imagine that, $800 million profit and labor is locked into concessions with no snapbacks. Too bad their master plan didn't work out so well. :p

I wonder if I would still have a job if I tossed away $750 million in a mere 3 months? :blink:  :blink:
[post="282913"][/post]​


That $700 Million plus profit is using fuel prices of 2004.

If you use fuel prices of the quarter the without further ratification concessions were obtained, then you are looking at a simple record profit in excess of $1.25 Billion Dollars for ONE QUARTER.

Thank God that financial wizard from ECLAT was on top of the program.

Oh but wait, we have an early opener option for negotiations....right? ;)
 
Relax, folks:

a. We have never hedged 100% of fuel - not even hedge-happy Southwest does that. Your calcs are way overstated. Try about 25% instead.

b. Hedges cost money, so the improvement in profits would not have been equal to the reduction in fuel prices. It would be that minus the cost of the hedges. Again, your calcs are overstated.

c. As WN is quickly finding out, healthy hedging gains do not make for a healthy airline. WN is going to have to grapple with some serious cost structure issues if they wish to continue the masquerade of being a profitable airline. AMR, on the other hand, is structurally strong because of the $4 billion in savings ($2 billion labor, $2 billion non-labor) we got in 2003. Other airlines are still playing catch-up to our cost structure.

d. Had we not sold our hedges we would not have survived long enough to realize these gains. We had to burn a little furniture in order to keep warm during the leaner years.
 
And so when the "others" do catch up to our industry leading low pay and benefits, then what?

Once again, there always seems to be some way to manipulate the numbers and make excuses.

"Never trust a number you did not manipulate yourself."

Corporate Finance Schemes are as corrupt as they come.

Forget about hedging fuel, the profits would have been record setting using un-hedge direct purchase fuel prices reported daily.
 

Latest posts