Just some thoughts about possible "concessions" we might be looking at...
1. On DFW-SAT-DFW turn, f/as would clean the plane at SAT as well as when they get back to DFW (because it is a thru-flight to Fresno. Lotta traffic on that SAT-FAT route, don't you know? ) This would be in line with SWA and some of the other lccs.
2. Set number of personal days per year (that could not be saved and carried over from one year to the next) to be used for sick, vacation, family business, whatever. When they're used up, they're used up. This would be the same or similar to what is being proposed for Delta flight attendants.
3. I would not be surprised to see the company get really serious about attendance issues and "restriction of output" issues, and more f/as than ever getting fired. (On this one, I'm not wholly opposed. Some of them NEED to be fired. And, I'm not just speaking as a junior flight attendant who would move up in seniority. There are some I am embarrassed to have to claim as co-workers.)
4. This centralized FMLA processing will result in fewer termination arbitrations being lost by the company when the issue is attendance and attendance related. No more of this--"The termination is revoked because the company representative did not explain FMLA correctly." Now, while I agree that there are some FSMs out there who don't have a clue on FMLA and probably DID explain it incorrectly, with the contempt that most f/as seem to have for their own FSM, how can they claim to be professionals and then depend upon someone they consider stupid giving them accurate information? It's all out there in print. Maybe the flight attendant should take some personal responsibility to educate himself or herself on the program. They get terminated and then all of a sudden it's "I'm just a poor dumb flight attendant and it made my head hurt to read those pamphlets; so, it's my FSM's fault that I had 13 more chargeable occurrences while I was in pre-termination."