Did you actually read the abstract in your link? This is a research paper. You have dismissed this out of hand without even reading it.
...In quite a long and complex paper
Several gases have climate impacts (some cause cooling rather than warming) and there are considerable uncertainties about the exact impacts and thus wide error limits. The range of uncertainly around the 3.5% figure (excluding cirrus) is given as 1.2% to 10%.
Dude, I have no idea who this group is. I will not defend, nor support them based on a position paper which I have not read.If you bother to check....IPCC has been shown to be full of Bull on many issues concerning GW......and I don't mean Bush.
Cow farts pose an extreme danger not only to GW but air quality on the whole.
We must do what is humanly possible to curb cow farting......
Nothing worse than cow farts in a closed barn on a still day.
Some have taken the lead on the frontier of cow farting by
utilizing smaller breed cows which are reducing cow emissions
and using less food......less food....less cow farts.
Taking the lead in cow emissions
Dude, I have no idea who this group is. I will not defend, nor support them based on a position paper which I have not read.
For the record, the CO2 emissions of aircraft are part of the deal in living in today's world. If we can find a better way, fine, but until then I am happy with the status-quo.
We will give up air travel right after we all give up our cars, trucks and trains...![]()
Hey DellDude,
Can you find the thread where there was a GW discussion and I said if it was man-made, aircraft would put out the highest CO2 emissions? And somebody 🙄 didn't agree with me on that one![]()
If you knew anything about the global warming debate, you would not have made that statement.If you lived where I live last winter it seemed like the ice age had returned.
Really...I don't know any aerospace engineers that are climatologists...I continue to argue that it was the very scientists who gave us the 'toys' that cause global warming that now are trying to put the blame on us for overusing our toys!
Wow. Unbelievable on how my words and ideas are spun out of control. First and foremost, I believe global warming exists but tend to doubt the "MAN-MADE" warming. If you lived where I live last winter it seemed like the ice age had returned.
I am knocking the data because it is laughable in thew fact that Aviation was wrong in estimating its contribution to global warming, so somebody had to step in and correct it. This means the greeners will put more pressure on your industry which means higher prices to cut emissions which means cut in jobs.
I continue to argue that it was the very scientists who gave us the 'toys' that cause global warming that now are trying to put the blame on us for overusing our toys! If man is truly capable of global warming, I wouldn't mind hot winters in my area!![]()
But lets keep buying into the fact that we humanoids are destroying the planet while PT Barnum gets rich![]()
Don't want to burst your little bubble there signal man......but the planets largest contributor of CO2 emissions happens to be the oceans.....