Benghazi Threads-Merged

[southwind]

Despite the fact that the REPUGS....."THINK" they're 'holding 4 ACES"....the only 'thing' that may/might/could...'have legs'...with the Majority of votes in 16' (keeping in mind that they are ALL low info voters),.....IS......the issuing of ..STAND DOWN...orders.

Now if EL-Rushbo was correct today, and this time I'm thinking he may be, is the fact that Hillary, and/or Leon Panetta...DO NOT/DID NOT have the authority to issue such orders to the Military, therefore the Military commander who was in charge over there pays NO attention to such (Hypothetical) order/orders. Hypothetical 'Stands' until such time that it can be proven !

Not exactly Rocket Science !

Who denied the Benghazi consulate the beefed up security they requested, months before the attack........ Einstein!

And why did the state department take it upon themselves to revise the CIA's account of events that transpired, 12 times ? Couldn't have had anything to do with the upcoming elections and be politically motivated...............could it ?

So, in closing, as long as it's the Demorats, who are lying to us because of political reasons, it's ok !

 

[KCFlyer]

Who denied the Benghazi consulate the beefed up security they requested, months before the attack........ Einstein!

And why did the state department take it upon themselves to revise the CIA's account of events that transpired, 12 times ? Couldn't have had anything to do with the upcoming elections and be politically motivated...............could it ?

So, in closing, as long as it's the Demorats, who are lying to us because of political reasons, it's ok !

Keep focusing on it and ask yourself this...in November 2016, who will remember Benghazi and if they do, how can they vote against Obama because of it?

 

[Hello3B]

Well...we can always HOPE he got a BJ in there somewhere. But bears is right....the republicans are so focused on this that they will let the country rot some more. Ask the average person that doesn't post on political message boards what Benghazi is and they'll likely tell you that it was some sort of cream you put on achy muscles. You HAVE to get the blowjob in there if we want to outrage America.

Geez KC, you seem obsessed with BJ's. it's been a while hasn't it?

 

[KCFlyer]

Geez KC, you seem obsessed with BJ's. it's been a while hasn't it?

A BJ has been the only thing the republicans have found that got them anywhere close to getting a president of the other party impeached. They tried questionable real estate deals. No dice. They tried a travel "scandal". Got nowhere. They tried a murder investigation for a suicide. Didn't get far. They investigated if Clinton farted in an elevator. The ONLY thing that got them what they wanted was a blowjob.

Now they want Obama. Here's some news - Benghazi ain't going to get him. If it does, you'll impeach him around 2015, and the trial will conclude, win or lose, around August 2016. He isn't running and you can't pin Benghazi on the democratic party. The only thing it might do is prevent Hillary from making a run. That might be better for the country if she didn't anyways...we've already seen what the republicans will (won't) do under Obama...and the only person they hate more than Obama is Hillary, so if she runs (and if she ran she WOULD get elected), we could expect at least an additional 4 years of republican bitching and moaning.

 

[Dog Wonder]

we've already seen what the republicans will (won't) do under Obama...and the only person they hate more than Obama is Hillary, so if she runs (and if she ran she WOULD get elected), we could expect at least an additional 4 years of republican bitching and moaning.

Bitching and moaning is what they do best.

An entire radio talk show industry is built on it.

 

[southwind]

I'm sorry the Demorats can't seem to find a show that can stay on the air but, then again they have problems creating jobs in the first, unless the government is the one signing the checks !

OH and this:
Has Benghazi become the Obama administration’s Watergate?

"The poll found that 42 percent of Americans said they disapprove of the way it has been handled, while 27 percent said they approve, reports Huffington Post."

So 27% of Americans don't have a problem being lied to..................wonder what political camp they belong to and if they had a problem with Bush lying to them ?

KC, Dog, Tree I take it your in the 27% !

 

[Ms Tree]

Nope. By the way. You should learn to argue without insults. Perhaps you will not look like such an idiot and your arguments may have a bit more credibility.

 

[Dog Wonder]

I'm sorry! Dog

Yes, you are sorry. We can agree on that.

What have you learned listening to your predicted President Herman Cain?

 

[KCFlyer]

KC, Dog, Tree I take it your in the 27% !

Nope..,only trying to figure out how pursuing this is going to help the republicans in 2016. Obama can't run. The democratic party had nothing to do with this, so it's not going to hurt them. As I said, it MIGHT keep Hillary from running in 2016, but that's about it.

Come 2016 when the average voter, who will still think that Benghazi is a sports cream, asks "what have you done for me lately" and the only thing the republicans can come back with is "we got Obama impeached", I think they'll go ahead and press the button for the democrat again. So keep up that investigation.

 

[Ms Tree]

They want to make this stick on Clinton because they do not want her to run.

 

[KCFlyer]

They want to make this stick on Clinton because they do not want her to run.

I don't doubt you are right - but who do they have to run against any democrat, and what can they point to as to what they have done for the country over the past 4 years other than tarnish the reputation of Hillary Clinton? "Bush lied, thousands died" only got Bush reelected. "Hillary lied and 4 died" - given our past history, I don't think that would cost her an election.

 

[southwind]

Nope. By the way. You should learn to argue without insults. Perhaps you will not look like such an idiot and your arguments may have a bit more credibility.

Told you before, I'm not part of the politically correct crowd, that contributes to the wussification of America !

Yes, you are sorry. We can agree on that.

What have you learned listening to your predicted President Herman Cain?

I have learned he is one of the "Evil Rich Bastards" you despise, which is enough for me !

Nope..,only trying to figure out how pursuing this is going to help the republicans in 2016. Obama can't run. The democratic party had nothing to do with this, so it's not going to hurt them. As I said, it MIGHT keep Hillary from running in 2016, but that's about it.

Come 2016 when the average voter, who will still think that Benghazi is a sports cream, asks "what have you done for me lately" and the only thing the republicans can come back with is "we got Obama impeached", I think they'll go ahead and press the button for the democrat again. So keep up that investigation.

Something wrong with "The Administration of Transparency" telling the truth , for once ?

And why did Hitlery haul a$$, right after she testified ?

 

[KCFlyer]

Told you before, I'm not part of the politically correct crowd, that contributes to the wussification of America !

Something wrong with "The Administration of Transparency" telling the truth , for once ?

And why did Hitlery haul a$$, right after she testified ?

So....the republican strategy is to run on the lack of transparency in the administration of a president who is NOT the candidate in 2016? That's another winning strategy (for the democrats). As I said...you all most likely have succeeded in dashing Hillary's plans for 2016. But...in the quest, you've offered up nothing to actually RUN on in 2016. Any investigation or trial is going to take a couple of years. And when the voter stands in that booth and says "what have you done for me lately?", they'll most likely reflect on Ben-Gayzi and pull the lever for whatever democrat is running.

Heck...I wish the democrats would repeal the 22nd amendment and put BILL Clinton on the ballot in 2016.

 

[Ms Tree]

Told you before, I'm not part of the politically correct crowd, that contributes to the wussification of America !


I have learned he is one of the "Evil Rich Bastards" you despise, which is enough for me !



Something wrong with "The Administration of Transparency" telling the truth , for once ?

And why did Hitlery haul a$$, right after she testified ?

Being PC has nothing to do with being insulting. They are two distinct issues. Calling people names to insult them is just rude and ignorant and adds nothing to your argument except to make you like more of an idiot.

 

[southwind]

So....the republican strategy is to run on the lack of transparency in the administration of a president who is NOT the candidate in 2016? That's another winning strategy (for the democrats). As I said...you all most likely have succeeded in dashing Hillary's plans for 2016. But...in the quest, you've offered up nothing to actually RUN on in 2016. Any investigation or trial is going to take a couple of years. And when the voter stands in that booth and says "what have you done for me lately?", they'll most likely reflect on Ben-Gayzi and pull the lever for whatever democrat is running.

Heck...I wish the democrats would repeal the 22nd amendment and put BILL Clinton on the ballot in 2016.

So #1 Hitlery wasn't part of BaRack's administration ?
#2 You don't give a damn about the truth when it concerns your party !

Being PC has nothing to do with being insulting. They are two distinct issues. Calling people names to insult them is just rude and ignorant and adds nothing to your argument except to make you like more of an idiot.

I'm offended!.............feel better now?