Bronner: Alabama Pension Fund

jB-Rocks

Member
Jan 20, 2004
89
0
Associated Press
Bronner: Fund Can Withstand US Airways Loss
Thursday September 9, 6:24 pm ET
By Jay Reeves, Associated Press Writer

Alabama Pension Fund Can Withstand Any US Airways Loss, Says Chief Executive
BIRMINGHAM, Ala. (AP) -- Alabama's retired teachers and government employees could lose a $240 million stake in US Airways if the airline can't pull out of its financial nosedive, but the high-profile head of the state's pension fund said Thursday the system is diversified enough to withstand the loss.


While huge for most investors, the loss would be small for the more than $25 billion portfolio of the Retirement Systems of Alabama, said chief executive officer David Bronner.
"It's less than 1 percent," he said. "Every point in the Dow is worth $1 million to me. When the Dow went down 300 points, that cost me more."
The difference this time is that Bronner's name is closely attached to the investment: Besides running the state pension system, he's also serving as chairman of the troubled carrier and created a stir a few weeks ago by publicly mentioning the possibility of liquidating the company.
Liquidation is still a possibility, Bronner said in an interview. But he expects US Airways to initially seek Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection unless unions agree to $800 million in cutbacks.
"It's either fix it before it goes into Chapter 11 or go into Chapter 11 and a judge gives you 60 to 90 days to come up with a plan to come back out," said Bronner, a veteran manager known in Alabama for his cigars and outspokenness on state issues.
US Airways Group Inc. is trying to avoid bankruptcy for a second time by cutting $1.5 billion a year, much of it in labor costs.
The airline is seeking $295 million annually in cuts from its 3,000 pilots, and $800 million from all its unions. But leaders of the pilots' union refused this week to send the company's proposal to members for a vote.
"We still absolutely have hopes of avoiding (Chapter) 11," Bronner said.
With more than 290,000 members, Alabama's retirement system has far-flung holdings that include broadcast outlets, newspapers, a Manhattan office building, golf courses and more traditional stocks and bonds. It bought into US Airways in December 2002 while the airline was in bankruptcy.
"Would I do it again? Absolutely," said Bronner. "It had $7.5 billion in revenues and we got controlling interest for $240 million."
An expert agreed with Bronner's assessment that the security of Alabama's public retirement system is not endangered by US Airways' condition.
"While it's a lot of money, it's not going to jeopardize the plan," said Robert McLeod, a finance professor at the University of Alabama and executive director of its MBA program. But state agencies and universities could have to contribute more to the plan per worker if the loss is too large, he said.
"That leaves less money for other things," said McLeod.
Bronner began seeking labor concessions almost immediately after the deal was announced, saying the fund could withdraw promised loans unless unions agreed to contract modifications. The company emerged from bankruptcy in March 2003, but the pressure for cutbacks didn't let up.
Standard & Poor's Rating Services lowered the company's debt classification on Wednesday, and share prices are down to below $2 from a high of $15.25 a year ago.
But the Alabama pension fund won't live or die by what happens to US Airways, he said. While the system could lose its entire investment, Bronner said it is too soon to determine what will happen.
"Will we make money or lose money? We're at halftime in a football game," he said. "But this is different than stocks. It sort of bothers me because there are 28,000, 29,000 (US Airways worker) families involved. I don't want to see them lose their jobs."
Like most any fund manager, Bronner has lost money -- lots of it -- on previous investments. But the university professor said the airline deal is different.
"It's the first time it's this visible," said McLeod.
 
PineyBob said:
THINK

If 37% cost 240 million @ $15/share what does 63% cost Bronner at $2.00 per shae?
[post="177875"][/post]​

Ugggh, it's too late for this...

$9.4 mil?
 
But you have to assume the liabilities, meaning the debt. If U was continuously making a profit, however small, it would be okay, however, as it stands right now, that is not the case.
 
PineyBob said:
THINK

If 37% cost 240 million @ $15/share what does 63% cost Bronner at $2.00 per shae?
[post="177875"][/post]​

Hmm.

.37x = $240 million/$15 per share
x = 43.24 million shares total
37% = 16 mm shares (RSA's stake)

43.24 million shares x .63 (%age of shares outstanding) = 27.24 million shares outstanding

27.24 million shares x $2/ea = $54.5 million to own it all?

Is this accurate?
 
PineyBob said:
THINK

If 37% cost 240 million @ $15/share what does 63% cost Bronner at $2.00 per shae?
[post="177875"][/post]​

Why on earth would he throw good money after bad?!?

If US is headed to Chapter 11, then the value of any equity will be wiped out. Why would you want to buy more? Besides, he already has control of the board now.

Think yourself.
 
speedlever said:
Hmm.

.37x = $240 million/$15 per share
x = 43.24 million shares total
37% = 16 mm shares (RSA's stake)

43.24 million shares x .63 (%age of shares outstanding) = 27.24 million shares outstanding

27.24 million shares x $2/ea = $54.5 million to own it all?

Is this accurate?
[post="177927"][/post]​

I don't think so. There is nothing wrong with the math, but there appears to be an unfounded assumption in the last calculation.

Where did the $2/shr in the last calculation come from? Even if that is a studied valuation of the outstanding shares today, it has no import once the company enters bankruptcy. ALL shares, including those held by RSA, will be worthless.

Well, that is not law; it's just precedent. Current shareholders rarely get anything out of bankruptcy other than "fond memories" of the good ole days.

If by some miracle, US Airways emerges from BK a second time, the company would most likely issue new shares with the financier-to-be-named-later getting the bulk--just as RSA did last time.

A lawyer friend (I don't usually admit to consorting with such people) told me that there is an argument in law that shareholders are not even unsecured creditors, they are owners of the business. Therefore, they are entitled to recompense from a bankruptcy only if the company is liquidated and only if all debts are paid and there is something left over.
 
It is very interesting when an investment group worth $25 billion dollars will declare bankruptcy on a company that is 1 percent of their investment, so they can avoid funding a pension payment on Sept 15th...When,.... they are an investment group from a pension fund, who doesn't want to lose their own pensions, huh?

How about freeing up some additional monies to keep the airline going, or is the plan of bankruptcy already their only plan they had in mind...
 
Res,
Simple answer inbreeding.I bet if you told all the BAMA people that when they retire they would get nothing plus take care of your own heath plan , they would be pi$$ed too.
:shock:
 
Reservation Agent said:
It is very interesting when an investment group worth $25 billion dollars will declare bankruptcy on a company that is 1 percent of their investment, so they can avoid funding a pension payment on Sept 15th...When,.... they are an investment group from a pension fund, who doesn't want to lose their own pensions, huh?

How about freeing up some additional monies to keep the airline going, or is the plan of bankruptcy already their only plan they had in mind...
[post="178067"][/post]​

Why do all of you keep making this about RSA? RSA is NOT forcing US Airways into BK.
A. RSA is not a creditor. RSA is a stockholder. Stockholders stand to lose everything in BK because the stock is almost always declared worthless and new stock is issued (assuming the company in BK is able to get out of BK).
B. RSA does not have a pension payment due. US Airways does.
C. RSA owns 37% of the outstanding stock. 37% is not a majority--not even with new math :p .

US Airways has two choices right now...
1. Make the pension payment on the 15th and default on the ATSB-backed loans shortly thereafter because they are unable to maintain the cash on hand required by the ATSB.
2. Go into bankruptcy and make the pension plans an unsecured creditor who gets paid after all secured loans are taken care of. Problem is (as I understand it), going into bankruptcy will ALSO put US Airways in default on the ATSB-backed loans.

But, bk is the LAST thing that RSA wants. If US Airways goes into BK then RSA can kiss their entire $240million investment goodbye. Why would they want to force that?
 
RSA is a creditor, they underwrote $75 million of the non gauranted ATSB loan and hold the notes on various airplanes.

And the RSA is the majority owner of US Airways Group and have 7 seats on the board which is the majority.

And the IRS is suppose to rule on the pension waiver Monday.

That is preferred stock, a series issued only to RSA.

US Airways also closed on exit facilities that provide the company with $1.24 billion in liquidity, including a $240 million equity investment from the Retirement Systems of Alabama Holdings LLC (RSA), and a $1 billion loan - $900 million of which is guaranteed by the Air Transportation Stabilization Board (ATSB). The remaining $100 million of at risk funds are provided by RSA ($75 million) and Bank of America N.A. ($25 million). All funds were received today. The company repaid RSA $372 million owed on the debtor-in-possession facility, and also paid RSA $9.4 million of administrative rent, and paid structuring, loan syndication, collateral agent, loan administration and professional fees and expenses totaling approximately $48 million

Consistent with the plan of reorganization confirmed by the U.S. Bankruptcy Court on March 18, 2003, the company's prior common stock has been cancelled. New restricted stock is being distributed in accordance with post-petition agreements. In exchange for its $240 million investment, RSA holds the lead investor position in the company with a 36.6 percent stake (on a fully diluted basis). The remaining stock will be divided as follows: Air Line Pilots Association (19.3 percent); other employees (10.8 percent); Unsecured Creditors (10.5 percent); ATSB (10.0 percent); management (7.8 percent); and General Electric (5.0 percent). US Airways will be listed on a public stock exchange, but those details were not disclosed, pending the completion of listing requirements and the distribution of unrestricted stock.

Also in conjunction with emergence, the company's previous Board of Directors was succeeded by a new Board of Directors selected under the reorganization plan. The new board members are: Dr. David G. Bronner, David N. Siegel, Morton Bahr, Rono J. Dutta, Cheryl Gruetzmacher Gordon, Perry Hayes, Robert L. Johnson, Bruce R. Lakefield, Joseph J. Mantineo, John McKenna, Hans Mirka, William D. Pollock, James M. Simon Jr., Raymond W. Smith and William T. Stephens.
 
jimntx said:
If US Airways goes into BK then RSA can kiss their entire $240million investment goodbye. Why would they want to force that?

Maybe RSA planned all along to thin the herd and bet on the other horses in the race. How many analysts have said there were too many airlines chasing too few customers? Some stock dopes had to have heard that and taken it to heart.

Cold, but possible.
 
700UW said:
RSA is a creditor, they underwrote $75 million of the non gauranted ATSB loan and hold the notes on various airplanes.

Non-guaranteed? You mean as in unsecured creditor? RSA has little to no hope of recouping that $75 million even in liquidation.

And the RSA is the majority owner of US Airways Group and have 7 seats on the board which is the majority.

700UW said:
And the IRS is suppose to rule on the pension waiver Monday.
Then why all the seeming agreement on the part of US Airways employees that Sunday is the day that BK will be filed? Sounds to me like the company does not have much hope of the IRS ruling in their favor.

700UW said:
That is preferred stock, a series issued only to RSA.
From Google:

Preferred Stock: A class of ownership in a corporation with a stated dividend that must be paid before dividends to common stock holders. Preferred stock does not usually have voting rights. However, as dividends are not being paid, the preferred stock owner is getting nothing.

Preferred shareholders have priority over common stockholders on earnings and assets in the event of liquidation. But ALL stockholders--common or preferred--get something from liquidation only after all debts--secured and unsecured are paid.

700UW said:
US Airways also closed on exit facilities that provide the company with $1.24 billion in liquidity, including a $240 million equity investment from the Retirement Systems of Alabama Holdings LLC (RSA), and a $1 billion loan - $900 million of which is guaranteed by the Air Transportation Stabilization Board (ATSB). The remaining $100 million of at risk funds are provided by RSA ($75 million) and Bank of America N.A. ($25 million). All funds were received today. The company repaid RSA $372 million owed on the debtor-in-possession facility, and also paid RSA $9.4 million of administrative rent, and paid structuring, loan syndication, collateral agent, loan administration and professional fees and expenses totaling approximately $48 million
[post="178320"][/post]​

All this means is that when US Airways exited from BK last time (i.e., old news), they used part of the ATSB-backed loan money repay RSA for the temporary loan made in BK to keep US Airways in the air while things were being sorted out in BK. I can assure you that the $9.4 million for "financing expenses" would have been paid to somebody. It just happened to be RSA. Do you think that Lazard Freres or JP Morgan Chase or Merrill Lynch would have put together the loan arrangement for free out of the goodness of their hearts? If so, you don't know NY investment banks very well. :lol:

I still haven't seen anyone of you who keep blaming the whole mess on RSA give me an explanation of what RSA stands to gain by wiping out the value of its stock and putting its loan at the bottom of the repay list through going into BK.
 

Latest posts