ClueByFour
Veteran
- Joined
- Aug 20, 2002
- Messages
- 3,566
- Reaction score
- 37
Try this on for some hubris:
The guy who owns that domain was hired in 1999. That means that he was:
1. Probably furloughed more than he was actually on the property at US Airways.
2. May or may not have even been back on the property at merger time (unlikely) and maybe not even when the Nicolau arbitration started (this I don't know), but he was off the property until at least 2004, according to the website formerly belonging to his side business.
What does he hope to windfall? Jump all the HP guys who brought jobs to the table? Most of which are probably his equal in DOH seniority and far greater in the longevity department.....
To repeat: a 1999 hire. The irony is stunning.
Wanton hubris.
The guy who owns that domain was hired in 1999. That means that he was:
1. Probably furloughed more than he was actually on the property at US Airways.
2. May or may not have even been back on the property at merger time (unlikely) and maybe not even when the Nicolau arbitration started (this I don't know), but he was off the property until at least 2004, according to the website formerly belonging to his side business.
What does he hope to windfall? Jump all the HP guys who brought jobs to the table? Most of which are probably his equal in DOH seniority and far greater in the longevity department.....
To repeat: a 1999 hire. The irony is stunning.
Wanton hubris.