Travelpro72
Veteran
- Joined
- Jan 30, 2005
- Messages
- 4,964
- Reaction score
- 455
www.jennycraig.com
What I'm saying is, for those who can't meet the "new" requirement , they should be allowed a certain amount of time to meet those requirements before the company puts them on unpaid medical leave.
These folks have bills to pay.
Too funny!!The grocery bill? Outstanding accounts with Baskin Robbins and Krispy Creme?
No, it is not. And if you take a job that requires you to fulfill certain weight requirements then this should be considered before taking on the job. Again, take responsibility for your life.How about a mortgage? Is that funny?
No, it is not. And if you take a job that requires you to fulfill certain weight requirements then this should be considered before taking on the job. Again, take responsibility for your life.
Link please? If this is "well-established" then a link supporting what you are saying should be easy for you to find and post here.It is well established that someone drinking thousands of calories of alcoholic beverages (only) per day will lose weight.
You are obviously going to believe what you want to believe, no matter what.You just keep telling yourself you are guaranteed to lose weight by eating enough MacDonald's apple pies calories to total less than your daily caloric use. I can then guarantee you will shortly be a blimp.
What is interesting about this is that they have decided it may not be safe if a f/a uses an extension on the jumpseat, yet at the same time are not prohibiting the use of extensions by passengers in the emergency exit rows.
I think they should ban extenders, period. But that's just me. If they want to start with the exit rows, I'll start writing letters.