Can This Man Save Us Airways

  • Thread Starter
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #16
I dont want it to succede by killing the employees economically why the execituves take another $24 million out of the company.
 
Lakefield's objective and purpose is to fix the cost and balance sheet so Bronner can sell and get his money. If they were going to liquidate they would have done that months ago.
 
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #18
Not true,

They want to go through the motions so if and when it fails they can blame labor.
 
The company will not fail. It will transform and compete . Surviving without the majority of its current employees, will be difficult, but a must as i see it. It doesnt breed loyality to continue to cut pay, but once newhires are in place, with no expectations, things will begin to ease off. Its not easy knowing someone will replace you making a fraction of what you were making, and being happy about it at the same time. Its reality however, and we can all talk about it to the cows come home, but its where its going.
 
700UW said:
Not true,

They want to go through the motions so if and when it fails they can blame labor.
[post="198802"][/post]​


Boy, you may not be logical or factual, but you are for sure consistant.
 
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #21
Lets see ole Doc Bronner and Lakefield Stated:

US had to file Bankruptcy once again because labor would not come to new agreements.

Then US attacks labor in the 1113e process, gee, my penison is not being funded but all the Executives' Pensions are!

Company puts more pressure on labor with the start of the 1113c process.

And almost 60 days into bankrutpcy and they have not even started talks with any lessors or creditors except the ATSB to share the sacrifice.

Gee why are 25 planes getting their engines mated?

Guess what?

Cure payments are due on 11/11/04 to a tune of a $100 million.

You will see planes either given back or repossed.

Does not take a financial wizard harvard MBA to figure out what is going on!
 
hadEnuff said:
Lakefield's objective and purpose is to fix the cost and balance sheet so Bronner can sell and get his money. If they were going to liquidate they would have done that months ago.
[post="198800"][/post]​

There was NO WAY, Bush was going to let US fold before the election! Plain and simple, in an election that close, he wasn't about to let 28,000 jobs go down the drain, just before people lined up to vote. Why do you think that they were so easy to convince, when the company wanted to use their money, even though the government has made it clear that they are no longer interested in bailing out airlines?

Now however, all bets are off! If the real intent is to end the suffering of this sick pup we call US Airways, you can bet life support will be pulled within the next couple of months. Then Bronner can buy up enough pieces to start his tresured, "Bama" airlines. Low fares, low paid employees, served up with good old Southern Comfort!
 
Imamec said:
There was NO WAY, Bush was going to let US fold before the election! Plain and simple, in an election that close, he wasn't about to let 28,000 jobs go down the drain, just before people lined up to vote. Why do you think that they were so easy to convince, when the company wanted to use their money, even though the government has made it clear that they are no longer interested in bailing out airlines?

Now however, all bets are off! If the real intent is to end the suffering of this sick pup we call US Airways, you can bet life support will be pulled within the next couple of months. Then Bronner can buy up enough pieces to start his tresured, "Bama" airlines. Low fares, low paid employees, served up with good old Southern Comfort!
[post="199044"][/post]​


AMEN!
 
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #25
usfliboi said:
But it does take someone in the know in the circle who does..... Your not!
[post="199042"][/post]​
Hate to burst your bubble, but I am in the circle and in the know.
 






***********STRIKE**********

********STRIKE***********


***************STRIKE**************

ENOUGH ALREADY WITH CCY>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
 
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #27
Tomorrow's Hearing D-day for planes:

Notice of Hearing -- Proposed Hearing Agenda for the Hearing Scheduled for November 9, 2004 (Re: related document(s)668 Objection, filed by U.S. Bank National Association, 647 Objection to Motion/Application, filed by CIT Leasing Corporation, GMAC Commercial Finance LLC, 648 Objection, filed by Bombardier Inc., 680 Objection to Motion/Application, filed by CIT Leasing Corporation, GMAC Commercial Finance LLC, 658 Objection to Motion/Application, filed by Pegasus Aviation, Inc., 669 Objection to Motion/Application, filed by Wachovia Bank, National Association f/k/a First Union National Bank, 640 Objection to Motion/Application, filed by Kreditanstalt Fur Wiederaufbau, 649 Objection, filed by Canadian Regional Aircraft Finance Transaction No. 1 Limited, 651 Objection to Motion/Application, filed by Allegheny County Airport Authority, 684 Response,,,, filed by US Airways, Inc., 652 Objection to Motion/Application, filed by Philadelphia Authority for Industrial Development, 653 Objection to Motion/Application, filed by U.S. Bank National Association, 654 Motion for Joinder,, filed by City of Philadelphia, Dept of Commerce, Division of Aviation, 685 Response,,,, filed by US Airways, Inc., 533 Motion to Extend Time, filed by US Airways, Inc., 535 Motion to Authorize, filed by US Airways, Inc., 643 Objection to Motion/Application,, filed by City of Phoenix, Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority, Wayne County, Asheville, Broward County Board of Commissioners, Broward County Aviation Department, Roanoke Regional Airport Commission, Columbus Regional Airport Authority, Lee County Port Authority, Lehigh-Northampton Airport Authority, 656 Objection to Motion/Application, filed by The Bank of New York (BNY) as Trustee, 667 Objection to Motion/Application, filed by Ad hoc committee of Certificate of Beneficial Interest Holders) filed by Daniel F. Blanks of McGuireWoods LLP on behalf of US Airways, Inc.. Hearing scheduled 11/9/2004 at 09:30 AM at Judge Mitchell's Courtroom, 200 South Washington Street, 2nd Floor, Courtroom I, Alexandria, VA. (Blanks, Daniel)
 
700, was that an attempt to show your in the know.. Thats public info ROFL! Please dude, you know about as much as anyone on here does.
 
Imamec said:
Makes me wonder... If your fares are low enough, can you still have an airline without planes? :lol:
[post="199068"][/post]​

Sure you can. They will have USAirways or Star Alliance liveries and be operated by a myriad of carriers. None of whom will be receiving a pay check from USAirways. Finally, Dave Siegel's "Virtual Airways" fully realized.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top