GoldenRam94
Senior
- Joined
- May 16, 2007
- Messages
- 443
- Reaction score
- 0
Nice idle threats Orioleman and Tim, but let's be brutally honest here. The next contract offer is only going to differ in wording slightly. Many of the items that you think you can get are out of reach in this market. You can live in the past and talk about what you gave up in Bankruptcy, but at the end of the day it is now 2008 and times have changed, and the industry has changed. The BOD is never going to allow a work group to go back to the 'way it was' because that will only bring this company down, even further than it already is.
There are tough decisions that this company has to make to survive and getting a baggage handler back to 1995 levels of pay and benefits is not one of them. You can talk all you want about getting rid of the 100K club. Let's see when all is said and done, I do not really see too much worry from a work group that has historically said one thing publicly then another when the vote really counts. I put you guys in the same category as the voters of New Hampshire. You say one thing publicly, but when it comes to time to make a hard decision, you buckle! You have historically buckled and you will certainly buckle again. Your drive to organize the IBEW was an embarrasing failure on your part. Now you are trying to save face with your 'network.' Is this like Skull and Bones at Yale? Do you guys have a secret handshake?????? 😛
Orioleman, since you are from Baltimore, I will assume you were a Piedmonter if you have enough time. It was the Piedmonters who told all the guys from Philly and Pit, that they wanted the Teamsters yadda yadda yadda, then when the time came to vote you all voted the Union out and started this company on the downward spiral when it came to worker relations. Just like the voters of New Hampshire told the pollsters that they wanted Obama, but when it came time to close the curtain and officially vote for a black man, they voted for Hillary. Fleet workers are historically like the recent events in New Hampshire. You will say one thing publicly, but when it really matters you will buckle.
There are tough decisions that this company has to make to survive and getting a baggage handler back to 1995 levels of pay and benefits is not one of them. You can talk all you want about getting rid of the 100K club. Let's see when all is said and done, I do not really see too much worry from a work group that has historically said one thing publicly then another when the vote really counts. I put you guys in the same category as the voters of New Hampshire. You say one thing publicly, but when it comes to time to make a hard decision, you buckle! You have historically buckled and you will certainly buckle again. Your drive to organize the IBEW was an embarrasing failure on your part. Now you are trying to save face with your 'network.' Is this like Skull and Bones at Yale? Do you guys have a secret handshake?????? 😛
Orioleman, since you are from Baltimore, I will assume you were a Piedmonter if you have enough time. It was the Piedmonters who told all the guys from Philly and Pit, that they wanted the Teamsters yadda yadda yadda, then when the time came to vote you all voted the Union out and started this company on the downward spiral when it came to worker relations. Just like the voters of New Hampshire told the pollsters that they wanted Obama, but when it came time to close the curtain and officially vote for a black man, they voted for Hillary. Fleet workers are historically like the recent events in New Hampshire. You will say one thing publicly, but when it really matters you will buckle.