City of Dallas to consider closing Love Field

If The City of Dallas has received grant money from the Federal Aviation Administration - Airport Improvement Program (AIP) that is being used to fund the improvements associated with the Love Field Master Plan, don't they have certain obligations they must fulfill -- namely keeping the airport open for use?

A couple of items from the overview section:

What Airports are Eligible?

AIP grants for planning, development, or noise compatibility projects are at or associated with individual public-use airports (including heliports and seaplane bases). A public-use airport is an airport open to the public that also meets the following criteria:

Publicly owned, or

Privately owned but designated by the FAA as a reliever, or

Privately owned but having scheduled service and at least 2,500 annual enplanements.

Further, to be eligible for a grant, an airport must be included in the NPIAS.

The NPIAS, which is prepared and published every 2 years, identifies public-use airports that are important to public transportation and contribute to the needs of civil aviation, national defense, and the Postal service.

(Note: Obviously the Federal Government sees a need for Love Field even if American Airlines, DFW Airport and the Fort Worth Parties don't. Otherwise it wouldn't have given Love Field any money at all.)

Recipients of grants are referred to as "sponsors." The description of eligible grant activities is described in the authorizing legislation and relates to capital items serving to develop and improve the airport in areas of safety, capacity, and noise compatibility. In addition to these basic principles, a sponsor must be legally, financially, and otherwise able to carry out the assurances and obligations contained in the project application and grant agreement.

{Note: Since the City of Dallas is the recipient of the grant, that makes them the sponsor. If Love Field is closed, how are they going to be able to carry out the assurances and obligations contained in the project application and grant agreement?

What Are the Obligations for Accepting AIP Funds?

Airports sponsors who accept a grant offer are also accepting conditions and obligations associated with the grant assurances.

These include obligations to operate and maintain the airport in a safe and servicable condition, not grant exclusive rights, mitigate hazards to airspace, and use airport revenue properly.


Grant Assurances (Airport Sponsor Obligations)

What are Grant Assurances?

When airport owners or sponsors, planning agencies, or other organizations accept funds from FAA-administered airport financial assistance programs, they must agree to certain obligations (or assurances). These obligations require the recipients to maintain and operate their facilities safely and efficiently and in accordance with specified conditions. The assurances appear either in the application for Federal assistance and become part of the final grant offer or in restrictive covenants to property deeds. The duration of these obligations depends on the type of recipient, the useful life of the facility being developed, and other conditions stipulated in the assurances.

How Does the FAA Determine Which Projects Will Receive AIP Funds?

Because the demand for AIP funds exceeds the availability, the FAA bases distribution of these funds on present national priorities and objectives. AIP funds are typically first apportioned into major entitlement categories such as primary, cargo, and general aviation.

Remaining funds are distributed to a discretionary fund. Set-aside projects (airport noise and the Military Airport Program) receive first attention from this discretionary distribution. The remaining funds are true discretionary funds that are distributed according to a national priortization formula.

If Love Field were to be closed, wouldn't the City of Dallas have to return that grant money back to the FAA?

LoneStarMike
 
If Love Field were to be closed, wouldn't the City of Dallas have to return that grant money back to the FAA?

With over 1200 acres of relatively clean land that close to downtown, I don't there would be too much concern over having money available to repay grants. Residential dirt is going for upward of $200K per acre in parts of Tarrant County, so I can only imagine what commercial dirt would be going for near downtown Dallas.
 
With over 1200 acres of relatively clean land that close to downtown, I don't there would be too much concern over having money available to repay grants. Residential dirt is going for upward of $200K per acre in parts of Tarrant County, so I can only imagine what commercial dirt would be going for near downtown Dallas.

Repaying grants does not get a sponsor out of its obligation to run the airport. That's just not good enough. Honestly, all of this would likely require special legislation. What's pathetic is these fat-cat developers propose these rediculous development schemes to local govs without mentioning the fact that it's basically illegal. Or maybe they're just that stupid or deceptive. Greed can do amazing things to one's brain.
 
Repaying grants does not get a sponsor out of its obligation to run the airport. That's just not good enough. Honestly, all of this would likely require special legislation. What's pathetic is these fat-cat developers propose these rediculous development schemes to local govs without mentioning the fact that it's basically illegal. Or maybe they're just that stupid or deceptive. Greed can do amazing things to one's brain.


Really? Have you seen Stapleton airport in Denver lately? It is being completely redeveloped. Is that illegal?
 
With over 1200 acres of relatively clean land that close to downtown, I don't there would be too much concern over having money available to repay grants. Residential dirt is going for upward of $200K per acre in parts of Tarrant County, so I can only imagine what commercial dirt would be going for near downtown Dallas.

Love Field is seven miles northwest of Downtown Dallas.

Source

Meacham Airport sits on 822 acres and is six miles northwest of Downtown Fort Worth

Source

If Dallas isn't interested in this fantastic deal, maybe the developers could scale down the project and pitch their offer to Fort Worth.

LoneStarMike
 
Love Field is seven miles northwest of Downtown Dallas.

Source

Meacham Airport sits on 822 acres and is six miles northwest of Downtown Fort Worth

Source

If Dallas isn't interested in this fantastic deal, maybe the developers could scale down the project and pitch their offer to Fort Worth.

LoneStarMike

Let's see Dallas 1.2 million people, Fort Worth 500 thousand, not exactly a good comparison.
 
If Dallas isn't interested in this fantastic deal, maybe the developers could scale down the project and pitch their offer to Fort Worth.

Look around Fort Worth, and there's plenty of open land for commercial development. Dallas on the other hand is pretty much land-locked unless you go into the flood-prone areas along the Trinity River which aren't suitable for anything other than industrial use, if that.

Still, at some point it wouldn't surprise me to see Meacham closed down and redeveloped. There's no reason that the existing GA traffic couldn't be pushed to Spinks (south of I-35/I-20 interchange), Alliance, or even JRB Carswell. There's certainly capacity available at all three of those airports.
 
Are you or these developers recommending that the city of Dallas spend all the proceeds from redeveloping Love Field to build an entirely new, greenfield airport to replace the utility and improve the capacity of Love Field like Denver did with Stapleton/DIA?
 
Are you or these developers recommending that the city of Dallas spend all the proceeds from redeveloping Love Field to build an entirely new, greenfield airport to replace the utility and improve the capacity of Love Field like Denver did with Stapleton/DIA?

Um, Dallas did that 35 years ago. It called Dallas/Fort Worth International Airpot or DFW, maybe you've heard of it. AA has a lot of flight out of there or so it seems.
 

Latest posts