What's new

Clinton campaign donations

delldude

Veteran
Joined
Oct 29, 2002
Messages
29,219
Reaction score
6,091
Location
Downrange
Article

Those penny pinchers

The Journal reported that a total of $200,000 in donations to Democratic committees and candidates from the Paw family of Daley City, Calif., and those of Norman Hsu, a wealthy New York businessmen who is a major Democratic donor and Clinton fund-raiser, had sometimes taken place about the same time.

Brings back fond memories of other 'questionable' donations from some other administration......

Its being looked into by certifiable sources.
 
I was reading in Time the other say that the Dems have out raised the Republicans by over $100 to date. This is the first time that has happened since the government has started to track donations. I think the amount of money being raised on both sides is unconscionable but having said that, one could argue that an 'uprising' of sorts is underway and that the republicans are about to get a rude awakening in Nov of '09.
 
Thanks, Dell, for backing up your assertion of "non-biased" links by posting a hyscience link. That definitely looks to be middle of the road. 🙄
 
Thanks, Dell, for backing up your assertion of "non-biased" links by posting a hyscience link. That definitely looks to be middle of the road. 🙄

Hey 12......do you ever lighten it up???

Any chance we could have a discussion over a tea or beer without resorting to 'shotz fired'???

No cliche withstanding......but I have Liberal friends probably more left than you and we have lively discussions without drawing blood....
 
Hey 12......do you ever lighten it up???

Any chance we could have a discussion over a tea or beer without resorting to 'shotz fired'???

No cliche withstanding......but I have Liberal friends probably more left than you and we have lively discussions without drawing blood....

Call it holding you accountable for your past arguments. Of course I don't give that up. When you tell me that I'm "wrong, wrong, wrong" for saying that you quote biased news sources like Fox News and you tell me that you post "objective" sources...well let's just say that the blogs I keep seeing you link to don't seem to be at all objective. They are brainwashed rags.

Discussion would be lovely. I believe there are numerous people I can have a real debate with...ones that are far more "true" to the ultra-conservative movement than you. I suppose that these discussions largely fall apart b/c you have a history if juvenile statements (not jest...I laugh at humor...just pitiful schoolyard crap) that you use with the intention of derailing any logical thread. Put your gun away and I'll be happy to put mine away...though I'll still point out the numerous inconsistencies you post b/c that is what debate is about.

And I'm proud of your discussions with your Liberal friends. I assume that you are much more mature in your approach in a face-to-face discussion. I have plenty of friends/family that are very staunch conservatives...we enjoy our discussions. But we all are able to tie our discussions and keep them going on topic without a nuclear "out" (dumb taunts) when panic sets in.

Bring back the good (consistent) debate and I'll bring back the love. But you're right...I won't respond well to dumb blogs. That's why I don't post them myself.
 
Mom/Dad have left the planet....I don't need a Mommy at this stage...thank you for trying.

You sound much like El Gato...with your references to blogs and approved sources....could you please provide me a list of sources which you are willing to accept? :lol:

Funny,I seriously think you need a drug test regarding sources......

You are the one who time and time again,in pure Liberal fashion run,duck and hide when faced with refuting information...you are one of those 'my way or the hi-way' clowns ....you are why America is FU**ED up friend......Liberalism has exactly the opposite consequence.

Get a life pussy...........

Call it holding you accountable for your past arguments. Of course I don't give that up. When you tell me that I'm "wrong, wrong, wrong" for saying that you quote biased news sources like Fox News and you tell me that you post "objective" sources...well let's just say that the blogs I keep seeing you link to don't seem to be at all objective. They are brainwashed rags.

Discussion would be lovely. I believe there are numerous people I can have a real debate with...ones that are far more "true" to the ultra-conservative movement than you. I suppose that these discussions largely fall apart b/c you have a history if juvenile statements (not jest...I laugh at humor...just pitiful schoolyard crap) that you use with the intention of derailing any logical thread. Put your gun away and I'll be happy to put mine away...though I'll still point out the numerous inconsistencies you post b/c that is what debate is about.

And I'm proud of your discussions with your Liberal friends. I assume that you are much more mature in your approach in a face-to-face discussion. I have plenty of friends/family that are very staunch conservatives...we enjoy our discussions. But we all are able to tie our discussions and keep them going on topic without a nuclear "out" (dumb taunts) when panic sets in.

Bring back the good (consistent) debate and I'll bring back the love. But you're right...I won't respond well to dumb blogs. That's why I don't post them myself.

And you now have crossed the infamous line of straying off topic you Liberal smack...you are no better than I.

W says hello
 
Back
Top