The synergies are the same. Only an AA/US combo can compete effectively with UA and DL. You may be in denial but most airline industry analysts agree.
Solid...
We may take a look at history and recognize the fact that UAL and DL both passed on merging with LCC and are in superior shape because of those choices.
Sure there are analyst out there that stand to profit handsomely iF AA and LCC merge, but the bigger questions, those that go beyond liberal use of terms like "synergies" and "cost savings", are things nobody has been willing to talk about. Everyone keeps raising the "synergy" flag...
Sure. I've looked at all the power points, and data our union has available. There's all sorts of authors, hired guns, internal analysis.. But you know whats missing in EVERY one of them? The post merger network picture.
Parker has said every base/hub will remain in the network. And, how many of you believe that? How durable is a PHL international hub with JFK a stones throw away? CLT's Caribbean network with MIA 30% under capacity.. (Whoops, there's that underutilized asset thats a slot machine stuck on 777)
Once you start pecking away at any hub LCC has, the LCC network loses money generating capability.
Sure, Parker has said "I will not attempt a hostile take over again", but we all know better... right? 🙄
An AA+LCC merger will put a world of hurt on AA employees when an integration is complete.
B6 is the better choice for AA.