What's new

dl142 was to meet w/ the company yesterday...

All I can say is that if I worked in CLT and got screwed out work and PIT got back...I think i'd want answers from my local,and going by the CBA wouldn't float.

This didn't happen overnite either...PIT guys were off for a couple weeks,so why did CLT drag its feet in that time period?
 
They did not drag their feet, they followed the contract, unlike Frank and Bill who idolize Monty Hall.
 
They did not drag their feet, they followed the contract, unlike Frank and Bill who idolize Monty Hall.
Actually Frank is a truly nice guy but Bill is a guy in a position over his head on every level looking and acting like an uneducated 60's hippie type.
 
Yes they were revered as gods in PIT..........
No wonder: Wasn't Frank the ring leader here...hmmm


Oh The God that he is.....but a God with negative results, nice guy though
------------------------------------

Agreement expected on US Airways repair facility

Saturday, December 15, 2001

By Mark Belko, Post-Gazette Staff Writer


The Allegheny County Airport Authority says it is close to a deal with US Airways to build a maintenance center at Pittsburgh International Airport that would service Airbus and Boeing 737 jets.

The center, to be financed exclusively with taxpayer dollars, would be a scaled down version of the $160 million maintenance complex agreed to by United Airlines before its merger with US Airways collapsed.

The new facility would cost an estimated $120 million to $130 million and would be built and financed by the airport authority with the help of the state. It is part of an effort by the county and the authority to retain as many as 5,000 maintenance-related jobs in the region.

Authority officials and the county have been discussing the complex with US Airways for the past month. The authority is hoping to receive a letter of intent from the airline, the airport's dominant carrier, within the next few days.

The letter would tie US Airways to leasing the facility, which would be owned by the authority. As presently envisioned, the center would service all Airbus jets and Boeing 737-300 and 400 aircraft in the US Airways fleet.

"We're hoping something can be resolved as soon as possible," authority Executive Director Kent George told authority board members at their meeting yesterday.

US Airways officials declined comment.

Allegheny County and the authority hatched the idea of undertaking construction of the maintenance center themselves after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks.

US Airways suffered huge losses in the weeks after the event as a skittish public spurned air travel. The airline, the nation's sixth largest, reported third-quarter losses of $433 million, reflecting the drop in air travel and a faltering economy. The carrier also said it expected to spend less than $20 million for nonaircraft capital projects in 2002.

With the airline unable to back the project financially, the authority came up with a plan to build the facility and to lease the space to US Airways.

The authority hopes to cobble together financing through its own funds and state help. It had sought $25 million from the state for the United maintenance project, but may need more than that to complete the latest incarnation.

"It appears there's a necessity for further [state] funds," George said, but he wouldn't elaborate.

While George told the board yesterday he does not have a signed agreement with US Airways "as of this minute," board Chairman Glenn Mahone said "there's still a very good possibility we will be able to conclude [an agreement] with US Airways by the end of the year."

The county is hoping to prevent the maintenance work -- and the thousands of jobs directly or indirectly related to it -- from migrating to other cities.

County Chief Executive Jim Roddey said last month that the airline also may be talking to other cities about its maintenance needs. He specifically mentioned Charlotte and Tampa, cities in which US Airways already does some maintenance work.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Staff writer Frank Reeves contributed to this report
 
Lets face it, as long as the Shifano crew runs the IAM at USAirways, Pittsburgh will come first!
 
Doesn't really matter now does it?

They did what they had to to protect their members at the time,CLT didn't.

Spin it anyway you want.

CLT by the book.....crack me up :lol:
Yeah Dell,
Spoken like a real Union man...At one time I thought you were the real deal..

I'm sure it "doesn't really matter" to you, Since you lost only one day of pay compared to what your "union brothers" in CLT lost... :down:

When will it sink in that the union is "supposed" to represent the members FAIRLY and the EQUALLY!!!!

It's really SAD that nothing has changed.

I can't believe all this talk about "CLT did this and PIT did that" HOW PATHETIC..

This is supposed to be one UNIFIED union...The International needs to step in and clean up this Cesspool.

And people wonder why the IAM was voted out of United and Northwest...

This union has gone from " an injury to one is an injury to all", to the NEW creed.."Forget YOU, I GOT MINE..

Merry Christmas, Happy New Year.....
 
The membership voted Frank in as a GC.

The democratic process at work.

Too hard to understand?
Hey 700,
Let's take a close look at the "democratic" process in place when voting for USAIR AGC's....

I hope that all USAIR IAM members realize that when a vote is held for AGC and higher positions, OTHER IAM members from OTHER AIRLINES ALSO are voting for OUR [USAIR's] officials..

Some would say, So What ?

If you recall, You received a list of people "The Slate" that is ALSO handed out to the OTHER IAM members that are employed by OTHER airlines..

Now, What this turns out to be, is a "I'll wash your back, if you wash mine sweetheart deal..[Which means that if you vote for USAIR's "slate", We'll vote for YOUR slate...

What this does, it makes it virtually impossible for anyone opposing these "incumbent" officers a real chance of unseating them...

700, This is your "democratic process at work" :down:

What needs to be done, [THIS WILL TAKE A BY-LAWS CHANGE] is to have ONLY the members that these Officers Represent, VOTE for their own officers...In other words, Usair IAM members vote ONLY for USAIR officers,
And IAM members from other airlines vote ONLY for THEIR own officials..This will make officers actually ACCOUNTABLE to the members they represent..

The way it stands today, it is virtually impossible to run against the SLATE and unseat the self-serving, one way dead end representation we have today....

Mr. Roach, Are you listening ? I e-mailed you 2 years ago about the need for a BY-LAWS change in this area..I never heard anything back...In all fairness, You might not of received the e-mail, It could of been intercepted by someone that likes the way "things are" today.
 
Deal was get 'em back or we're walkin'.....

When a grievance happens in PIT,its an Int'l matter at the time?

Ever stop and think at the time they weren't privy to what was happening in CLT?

Does Tony call Frank when someone is reprimanded in CLT?

Did tony call Frank and tell them what happened in CLT?
BINGO ! DELL,
Pass Go, Collect $200 Dollars..

Are you suggesting that the AGC's in PIT and CLT COMMUNICATE with each other BEFORE making a HUGE decision like the Force Majeur issue ????

I guess "common sense" would of have to be involved with a move like that... :huh:
 
BINGO ! DELL,
Pass Go, Collect $200 Dollars..

Are you suggesting that the AGC's in PIT and CLT COMMUNICATE with each other BEFORE making a HUGE decision like the Force Majeur issue ????

I guess "common sense" would of have to be involved with a move like that... :huh:
Hope you feel better now Inspector Gadget and got it all out of your system with those ops checks via these boards 😛
 
Roach has nothing to do with District Bylaws, that would be the District and if you are so concerned about it, why have you not submitted a proposal at your union meeting to send a bylaw change to the District Convention?

See Roach works for the International not the District.
 
BINGO ! DELL,
Pass Go, Collect $200 Dollars..

Are you suggesting that the AGC's in PIT and CLT COMMUNICATE with each other BEFORE making a HUGE decision like the Force Majeur issue ????

I guess "common sense" would of have to be involved with a move like that... :huh:

All I can tell you is on a Sunday morning around 11 am I was told from my Inspection dept manager that "My services were no longer required"...verbatim.I had all kinds of questions and he couldn't answer them....we had dept 435 full of friggin newbies and I wanted to know why I was being layed off....no answer...finally he let it out that he was only doing what he was told.I called 435 Inspection and told Coveny what was going down....Then sometime down the road Frank and company started getting inundated with calls.

If PIT could threaten and get its people back over a two week period...where the heck were your guys in CLT at the time and why couldn't they get their people back?And don't give me any this by the book horsecrap....dude if it worked in PIT with U management...why didn't it work in CLT? Key player here in the middle of CLT/PIT is U management.......kinda looks like they played two cities as suckers....divide and conquer? looks to me like they played us out good.

Looks to me like it worked....5 years down the road and we're still at each others throats.

One engine dept management between two cities(LeBeau)-one gets back to work,one doesn't...both cities know it too.Hmmmm,interesting.

Pit local did what they thought was right at the time...yeah,they probably should have coordinated together.
What would you have done when its hitting the fan all around and people are screaming at you to do something....it ain't an easy job representing people.Never satisfy everyone,thats a fact.Its even easier second guessing.

Have a nice Christmas Day,89
 

Latest posts

Back
Top