Do You Want To Re- Elect Bush For Presendent!

[KCFlyer]

why not?
we must kill this terrorism thing or it will return......he's the man...kerry will not pursue.
think of the what if's for your children and grandchildren.

It seems to me that terrorism is growing because of our actions in Iraq. I doubt that Kerry will pull out of Iraq if he's elected...we're (the USA) are stuck there for a while, and it'll be interesting if the UN (whom the Bush Administration indicates MUST play a role) will sit back and tell the Bushies "You got yourself into this mess, now get yourselves out". If Kerry is elected, I've got a strong feeling that the rest of the world will actually want to help the US thru this mess. Right now, the Bushies pretty much gave the middle finger to the vast majority of the world, and embarked on a "mission", that the US has typically deplored a similar action from any other country in the world.

And...seeings how the terrorists are very much aware of what our president does and says, he might want to tone down on this "ordained by God" talk. Sort of makes it look like "our" God told our leader that it was okay for us to bomb civilians in Iraq, but when "their" God tells them to fly jetliners into buildings, then their God is bad.

 

[sentrido]

why not?
we must kill this terrorism thing or it will return......he's the man...kerry will not pursue.
think of the what if's for your children and grandchildren.

Of course Kerry will persue.

What evidence do you give to think he wont? NONE!
Your just another victime of republicans trying to scare you into voting for Bush.

Oh please Mr Bush, Save us from the weak democrat who will sit back while our nation is destroyed! BULL !@#$

Again you amaze me with your ability to bring nothing to the table but recycled
Hannityisms.

 

[A10Pilot]

Right now, the Bushies pretty much gave the middle finger to the vast majority of the world, and embarked on a "mission", that the US has typically deplored a similar action from any other country in the world

We have over thirty countries giving us direct and indirect aid in Operation Iraqi Freedom. Even those weak-kneed 'allies', who were actively opposing us during our UN efforts resulting in the UN Resolution 1441, are providing basing operations and other logistical and intel support.

That being said and dispelled, we will NOT subjugate our National Security to the rest of the world. If it came down to having three allies instead of over thirty, so be it.

Sort of makes it look like "our" God told our leader that it was okay for us to bomb civilians in Iraq, but when "their" God tells them to fly jetliners into buildings, then their God is bad.

This rates right near the top in the OUTRAGEOUS comments made on this board. You are equating collateral damage, which have occurred despite our EXTRAORDINARY efforts to avoid them- even at the risk to our own troops - with the most devastating DELIBERATE ATTACK on American soil against innocent civilians in our HISTORY?!?!?!

You can add this inane comment with (among others) the guy who said I, and my fellow airman, DESERVED to be shot at by Iraqis while we were enforcing the UN Resolution No-Fly Zones because we were flying in a 'threatening manner'.

Of course Kerry will persue.

What evidence do you give to think he wont? NONE!
Your just another victime of republicans trying to scare you into voting for Bush.

Oh please Mr Bush, Save us from the weak democrat who will sit back while our nation is destroyed!

There is a litany of evidence that Kerry will not 'persue' (sic) the terrorists. That he will subjugate our security to the will of nations like France who was illegally dealing with Hussein both before and after OIF began (including illegal shipment of military equipment they were using against me and my military brethren). He tried to gut the intelligence budget shortly after the initial attack on the Twin Towers - even being reprimanded publicly on the Senate floor by fellow democrats. He has voted against practically every defense system currently being employed in the War on Terror.

The closest to being interested in our security was when he signed a letter sent to President Clinton stating Iraq's WMDs, WMD programs, and Hussein posed a serious threat and Clinton should take action. The same WMDs and programs identified by Clinton, Blair, the United Nations, and others during the lead up to UN Resolution 1441.

That and his vote in Congress leading up to Operation Iraqi Freedom. Then, the Congress was given opportunity to vote on authorization of force in Iraq without international consent. Kerry voted FOR this measure. Problem is he subsequently faced a vote to appropriate funds for the continued support of the the action he previously voted for and he voted NO. So, Kerry votes FOR the war but against funding the war – good one.

In 1997, Kerry was determined to SLASH the intelligence budgets wanting to cut $1.5 BILLION from our ability to secure our nation. He was the ONLY Senator to sponsor the bill, which thankfully never made it to the floor. This is the same Senator who questioned the necessity of our intelligence force since the Cold War was over, “Now that that struggle is over, why is it that our vast intelligence apparatus continues to grow…â€, said Kerry. Just four years later he called our intelligence capability “ineffective†and “in need of a major overhaul†– the GALL of this guy!!! With ‘friends’ like him, the intelligence community and our National Security don’t need enemies.

- Kerry also voted against the following weapons programs (all being employed against the terrorists in the War On Terror:
B-1 Lancer
B-2 Stealth Bomber
F-16 Falcon
F-15 Eagle
F-14 Tomcat
Apache Helicopter
Patriot Missile
Trident Missile
M-1 Abrams Tank
Bradley Fighting Vehicle
Tomahawk Cruise Missile

Kerry is NOT what we need to lead us in this desperate fight against terrorists bent on destroying our way of life.

A10 Pilot

**** Never have so many whined so much while having their lives altered so little facing so great a threat. ****

 

[Fly]

Who ever wrote this has my vote and probably every other Americans vote in the country; Republican and Democrat alike:

My fellow Americans:

As you all know, the defeat of Iraq's regime has been completed. Since Congress does not want to spend any more money on this war, our mission in Iraq is complete.

This morning I gave the order for a complete removal of all American forces from Iraq. This action will be complete within 30 days. It is now time to begin the reckoning.

Before me, I have two lists. One list contains the names of countries which have stood by our side during the Iraq conflict. This list is short. The United Kingdom, Spain, Bulgaria, Australia, Norway and Poland are some of the countries listed there.

The other list contains everyone not on the first list.. Most of the world's nations are on that list. My press secretary will be distributing copies of both lists later this evening.

Let me start by saying that effective immediately, foreign aid to those nations on List 2 ceases immediately and indefinitely. The money saved during the first year alone will pretty much pay for
the costs of the Iraqi war.

The American people are no longer going to pour money into third world hell-holes and watch those government leaders grow fat on corruption. Need help with a famine? Wrestling with an epidemic? Call France.

In the future, together with Congress, I will work to cut taxes and solve some local problems. On that note, here's a word to terrorist organizations. Screw with us and we will hunt you down and eliminate you and all your friends from the face of the earth. Thirsting for a gutsy country to terrorize? Try France, or maybe China.

To Israel and the Palestinian Authority: You, boys work out a peace deal now. Just note that Camp David is closed. Maybe all of you can go to Russia for negotiations. They have some great palaces there. Big tables, too.

I'm ordering the immediate severing of diplomatic relations with France, Germany, and Russia. Thanks for all your help, comrades. We are retiring from NATO as well. Bon chance, mes amis.

I have instructed the Mayor of New York City to begin towing the many cars of diplomats with outstanding tickets. Anyone in the UN with more than two unpaid tickets will have their cars towed to sites where those vehicles will be stripped, shredded and crushed. I don't care about whatever treaty pertains to this. Pay your tickets tomorrow or watch your precious Benzes, Beamers, and limos be turned over to some of the finest chop shops in the world. I love
New York.

A special note to our neighbors: Canada is on List 2. Since we are going to be seeing a lot more of each other, you folks might want to try not pissing us off for a change. Mexico is also on List 2. President Fox and his entire corrupt government really need an attitude adjustment. I have a couple extra tank and infantry divisions sitting around. Guess where I'm gonna put 'em? Yep, border security. So start doing something with your oil.

Oh, by the way, the United States is abrogating the NAFTA isolationism. I answer them by
saying, "darn tootin".

Nearly a century of trying to help folks live a decent life around the world has only earned us the undying enmity of just about everyone on the planet.


It is time to cut taxes here because we will not be spending on other peoples problems.

To the nations on List 1, a final thought. Thanks guys. We owe you. To the nations on List 2, a final thought. Drop dead. God bless America.
Thank you and good night.

Author Unknown

 

[local 12 proud]

my vote for PRESIDENT will go to the author of above statement.......send a copy to bush and kerry!

 

[UAL_TECH]

We have over thirty countries giving us direct and indirect aid in Operation Iraqi Freedom. Even those weak-kneed 'allies', who were actively opposing us during our UN efforts resulting in the UN Resolution 1441, are providing basing operations and other logistical and intel support.

That being said and dispelled, we will NOT subjugate our National Security to the rest of the world. If it came down to having three allies instead of over thirty, so be it.



This rates right near the top in the OUTRAGEOUS comments made on this board. You are equating collateral damage, which have occurred despite our EXTRAORDINARY efforts to avoid them- even at the risk to our own troops - with the most devastating DELIBERATE ATTACK on American soil against innocent civilians in our HISTORY?!?!?!

You can add this inane comment with (among others) the guy who said I, and my fellow airman, DESERVED to be shot at by Iraqis while we were enforcing the UN Resolution No-Fly Zones because we were flying in a 'threatening manner'.



There is a litany of evidence that Kerry will not 'persue' (sic) the terrorists. That he will subjugate our security to the will of nations like France who was illegally dealing with Hussein both before and after OIF began (including illegal shipment of military equipment they were using against me and my military brethren). He tried to gut the intelligence budget shortly after the initial attack on the Twin Towers - even being reprimanded publicly on the Senate floor by fellow democrats. He has voted against practically every defense system currently being employed in the War on Terror.

The closest to being interested in our security was when he signed a letter sent to President Clinton stating Iraq's WMDs, WMD programs, and Hussein posed a serious threat and Clinton should take action. The same WMDs and programs identified by Clinton, Blair, the United Nations, and others during the lead up to UN Resolution 1441.

That and his vote in Congress leading up to Operation Iraqi Freedom. Then, the Congress was given opportunity to vote on authorization of force in Iraq without international consent. Kerry voted FOR this measure. Problem is he subsequently faced a vote to appropriate funds for the continued support of the the action he previously voted for and he voted NO. So, Kerry votes FOR the war but against funding the war – good one.

In 1997, Kerry was determined to SLASH the intelligence budgets wanting to cut $1.5 BILLION from our ability to secure our nation. He was the ONLY Senator to sponsor the bill, which thankfully never made it to the floor. This is the same Senator who questioned the necessity of our intelligence force since the Cold War was over, “Now that that struggle is over, why is it that our vast intelligence apparatus continues to grow…â€, said Kerry. Just four years later he called our intelligence capability “ineffective†and “in need of a major overhaul†– the GALL of this guy!!! With ‘friends’ like him, the intelligence community and our National Security don’t need enemies.

- Kerry also voted against the following weapons programs (all being employed against the terrorists in the War On Terror:
B-1 Lancer
B-2 Stealth Bomber
F-16 Falcon
F-15 Eagle
F-14 Tomcat
Apache Helicopter
Patriot Missile
Trident Missile
M-1 Abrams Tank
Bradley Fighting Vehicle
Tomahawk Cruise Missile

Kerry is NOT what we need to lead us in this desperate fight against terrorists bent on destroying our way of life.

A10 Pilot

**** Never have so many whined so much while having their lives altered so little facing so great a threat. ****

A10 Pilot,

First of all, I would like to express my appreciation for your service!!!

Being ‘on the front’ is a much unappreciated predicament.
JMHO, your stances on these issues are understandable as you must
‘justify’ what you do every day (at least in your own mind).

However, your platform of being ‘Pro Bush’ at all costs is unrealistic.

Please explain to me as to how ‘ANY’ of these weapons that you have
Outlined could defeat ‘ANY’ WAR? on ‘TERROISIM’?

Terrorism has been in existence for a millennium and you believe that
having more Apache helicopters would provide world piece?

Please explain how?

UT

PS:
**** Never have so many whined so much while having their lives altered so little facing so great a threat. ****
What the HELL is this supposed to imply?

 

[TWAnr]

In 1997, Kerry was determined to SLASH the intelligence budgets wanting to cut $1.5 BILLION from our ability to secure our nation.

Kerry also voted against the following weapons programs...

As always, we can count on A10Pilot to post information that is out of context, incomplete and misleading.

For for the accurate facts, not according to the Bush Cheney propaganda machine, please refer to the Annenberg Public Policy Center of the University of Pennsylvania's FactCheck.org.

These are links to refute A10's latest assertions:

http://www.factcheck.org/article.aspx?docid=147

http://www.factcheck.org/article.aspx?docid=177

http://www.factcheck.org/article.aspx?docid=153

 

[KCFlyer]

This rates right near the top in the OUTRAGEOUS comments made on this board. You are equating collateral damage, which have occurred despite our EXTRAORDINARY efforts to avoid them- even at the risk to our own troops - with the most devastating DELIBERATE ATTACK on American soil against innocent civilians in our HISTORY?!?!?!

You miss the point...does the word "jihad" mean anything to you? From what I understand, it means "holy war". And Bush's almost daily affirmations that it's "God's will" for whatever he does is really no different than an Arab flying jets into buildings in the name of Allah. The message it sends to those families of "collateral damage" is that our God is better than their God. So he'd be better off offering up his statement of "God's will" , when the will of his God resulted in a lot of collateral damage, to Laura or Rummy in private and not on a podium. Sorta sends a message that could be interpreted by our terrorist friends that it really IS a holy war they are fighting. And it's apparently pretty easy to recruit folks to your cause over there when you're talking about a holy war. I'm quite surprised that he doesn't give"Thou shalt not kill" a little more weight...the collateral damage over there in Iraq is over a war that was not necessary. But hey, I'm a good Christian boy myself...I believe the verse about "To err is human, to forgive - divine". So I'll do what I can to get Bush out of office and forgive him.

And you're sadly mistaken if you think I'm calling you all "baby killers" like they did during the Vietnam War....I support the men and women serving over there. I pray for their safety every night (lucky for y'all, I pray to the "good" God, according to our president). But your commander in chief and his posse of deputies really had to stretch for a reason to attack Iraq. IMHO, what we've "done" for Iraq has not yet amounted to enough to make up for the loss of even one American soldiers life. It certainly hasn't made the middle east, the USA, or the rest of the world any safer from terrorist attack. The only thing it's done is to increase the chances of terrorism all over the world. If you doubt it, I'll betcha that homeland security has an orange alert out over July 4 this year.

 

[A10Pilot]

And Bush's almost daily affirmations that it's "God's will" for whatever he does is really no different than an Arab flying jets into buildings in the name of Allah. The message it sends to those families of "collateral damage" is that our God is better than their God.

Your moral relativism and moral equivalence continues to astound me.

One more time: They (the terrorists... ie the evil ones) are DELIBERATELY attacking innocent civilians. They are hell bent on killing as many of us as possible. For them, a nuclear device in downtown NYC with 1,000,000+ dead would be NIRVANA. If they could have a bio attack kill 10s of thousands in five major cities and the subsequent panic bring financial devastation and chaos in the US they would be celebrating.

We are trying to fight these terrorists. We don't purposely attack civilians. We are targeting the combatants.

What part of this do you not understand? Once again, the other pilots in my squadron are aghast at your thinking.

There is a HUGE difference between an Arab terrorist flying jets into buildings and our brave military men and women's actions in the War On Terror.

A10 Pilot

 

[KCFlyer]

Your moral relativism and moral equivalence continues to astound me.

One more time: They (the terrorists... ie the evil ones) are DELIBERATELY attacking innocent civilians. They are hell bent on killing as many of us as possible. For them, a nuclear device in downtown NYC with 1,000,000+ dead would be NIRVANA. If they could have a bio attack kill 10s of thousands in five major cities and the subsequent panic bring financial devastation and chaos in the US they would be celebrating.

We are trying to fight these terrorists. We don't purposely attack civilians. We are targeting the combatants.

What part of this do you not understand? Once again, the other pilots in my squadron are aghast at your thinking.

There is a HUGE difference between an Arab terrorist flying jets into buildings and our brave military men and women's actions in the War On Terror.

A10 Pilot

Boiled down to a few words:

What the terrorists did, they did in the name of Allah. What Bush is doing, he is doing (apparently) in the name of God. Net result - our God versus your God. Bottom line, when it's a "holy war", it's far easier for the terrorist groups to recruit new members.

All I'm saying is that your commander in chief needs to tone down his religious statements, because those statements are doing more harm than good for you and the other pilots in your group.

 

[A10Pilot]

What the terrorists did, they did in the name of Allah. What Bush is doing, he is doing (apparently) in the name of God. Net result - our God versus your God. Bottom line, when it's a "holy war", it's far easier for the terrorist groups to recruit new members.

What the President is doing is NOT Holy War. He is fulfilling his duty to protect Americans and ensure National Security. He is trying to prevent future 9/11s that would make the first one look pale in comparison.

Your attempt to paint this as two equivalent "Holy Wars" is outrageous.

A10 Pilot

 

[Fly]

Bush is protecting us?!? RIGHT! Hey George, here's a suggestion: Go bomb EVERY country; invade them, humiliate their people, strip them of their dignity, show them who's the boss. Be proactive...bomb them before they bomb us. So far, so good...you've already invaded Iraq illegally, why stop now?

 

[KCFlyer]

What the President is doing is NOT Holy War. He is fulfilling his duty to protect Americans and ensure National Security. He is trying to prevent future 9/11s that would make the first one look pale in comparison.

Your attempt to paint this as two equivalent "Holy Wars" is outrageous.

A10 Pilot

If it is not a holy war, why are certain groups beheading American's in the name of Allah while we are "liberating" people (who are begining to see us more and more as "occupiers" and less as "liberators") in the name of God?

I am surprised that you can't see this - your enemy (not us) is viewing this as a holy war...talk of a "crusade" (you remember what the crusades were all about, don't you??) and doing things because it is somehow "God's will" makes your enemy feel that it most certainly IS a holy war. And...in a "holy war", even if only one side views it as a holy war, it's MUCH easier for terrorist groups to recruit new members.


But I guess that in your view, when your commander in chief passes gas, it somehow smells like a basketful of potpourri. In other words, he's infallible, unless he happens to be a Democrat.

 

[delldude]

so maybe we are long overdue for a CHRISTIAN CRUSADE
like the good old days riding with KNIGHTS TEMPLAR ONLY WITH F-16'S AND TACTICAL NUKES......
all in the name of god of course.

 

[delldude]

Of course Kerry will persue.

What evidence do you give to think he wont? NONE!
Your just another victime of republicans trying to scare you into voting for Bush.

Oh please Mr Bush, Save us from the weak democrat who will sit back while our nation is destroyed! BULL !@#$

Again you amaze me with your ability to bring nothing to the table but recycled
Hannityisms.

i'm sorry my friend...i was out back getting HANNITIZED :wub: