What's new

Do You Want To Re- Elect Bush For Presendent!

delldude said:
well then lets light one of these off near your stead and then see what you say about 'old stuff nobody really cares about'. :lol:
OLD ORDNANCE:
If terrorists want to kill people here, they dont need to import anything from Iraq to do it.
 
delldude said:
Couldn't help but notice the article was from Newsmax. Why is it that when someone cites an article on CNN, the "source" is blasted as a left wing liberal news rag, but Newsmax is considered an unbiased source of 'truth'?
 
KCFlyer said:
Couldn't help but notice the article was from Newsmax. Why is it that when someone cites an article on CNN, the "source" is blasted as a left wing liberal news rag, but Newsmax is considered an unbiased source of 'truth'?
Because Rush said so?

🙄
 
And do u think that any President would have responded differently than GWB: Reagan, Clinton, Ford, Nixon all would have responded in the same way as Bush! Those who think that Bush is some kind of exception are absolutely wrong.
 
JI Guy said:
And do u think that any President would have responded differently than GWB
Responded to what? 9/11? I don't think the others would have turned around and invaded Iraq. Afghanistan, sure. Iraq? Nope. Not even Bush Daddy.
 
mweiss said:
Responded to what? 9/11? I don't think the others would have turned around and invaded Iraq. Afghanistan, sure. Iraq? Nope. Not even Bush Daddy.
Ditto!!
 
sentrido said:
Wow, there would be somthing here if more than ONE shell had shown up. Theres nothing here but a lot of speculation. Look, if the stockpiles show up, I'll be the first to admit I was wrong, dude.
i have more respect for you and your position...don't be this narrow minded. :lol:
dude...where theres one,theres more...you just fall off the turnip truck?? :up:
one friggin sarin shell in all of iraq...sentrido says..... :lol:
 
KCFlyer said:
Couldn't help but notice the article was from Newsmax. Why is it that when someone cites an article on CNN, the "source" is blasted as a left wing liberal news rag, but Newsmax is considered an unbiased source of 'truth'?
ah ha ha ha....i try to nurture an educated opinion...by doing this it requires me to access both sides of an issue...and then i determine the information's credibility and make a decision as to who is credible and who isn't......i see you people for the most part go with one side...right sentrido???right KC?
 
delldude said:
ah ha ha ha....i try to nurture an educated opinion...by doing this it requires me to access both sides of an issue...and then i determine the information's credibility and make a decision as to who is credible and who isn't......i see you people for the most part go with one side...right sentrido???right KC?
I'd believe that statement if I'd have ever read even ONE of your posts where you had something positive to say about Bill Clinton or John Kerry. Alas, I suppose being "educated" means that it's okay if your views are solely to the far right.

What's your take on the 9/11 commissons findings that Iraq had no ties to 9/11 and Al Queda? You remember that, don't you? That was our President's justification number 1 for attacking Iraq. But anymore, we are supposed to forget that and support our president because the REAL reason we are in Iraq is because Saddam was a "murderous thug" to his own people? Are you willing to believe that commission, or does Cheney have all the "facts". And if he has the facts, but for some reason was withholding them from the 9/11 commission, shouldn't he resign for not cooperating?
 
Back
Top