sentrido
Veteran
- Joined
- Jan 8, 2004
- Messages
- 1,004
- Reaction score
- 0
Intersting stuff. I supposed the "calculated" cost of the free pro bush exposure given by rush, savage, hannity will be in next month issue, right?delldude said:
Intersting stuff. I supposed the "calculated" cost of the free pro bush exposure given by rush, savage, hannity will be in next month issue, right?delldude said:
nothing new here.delldude said:
If terrorists want to kill people here, they dont need to import anything from Iraq to do it.delldude said:well then lets light one of these off near your stead and then see what you say about 'old stuff nobody really cares about'.
OLD ORDNANCE:
Wow, there would be somthing here if more than ONE shell had shown up. Theres nothing here but a lot of speculation. Look, if the stockpiles show up, I'll be the first to admit I was wrong, dude.delldude said:
Couldn't help but notice the article was from Newsmax. Why is it that when someone cites an article on CNN, the "source" is blasted as a left wing liberal news rag, but Newsmax is considered an unbiased source of 'truth'?delldude said:
Because Rush said so?KCFlyer said:Couldn't help but notice the article was from Newsmax. Why is it that when someone cites an article on CNN, the "source" is blasted as a left wing liberal news rag, but Newsmax is considered an unbiased source of 'truth'?
Ditto!TWAnr said:Because Rush said so?
🙄
Responded to what? 9/11? I don't think the others would have turned around and invaded Iraq. Afghanistan, sure. Iraq? Nope. Not even Bush Daddy.JI Guy said:And do u think that any President would have responded differently than GWB
Ditto!!mweiss said:Responded to what? 9/11? I don't think the others would have turned around and invaded Iraq. Afghanistan, sure. Iraq? Nope. Not even Bush Daddy.
i have more respect for you and your position...don't be this narrow minded.sentrido said:Wow, there would be somthing here if more than ONE shell had shown up. Theres nothing here but a lot of speculation. Look, if the stockpiles show up, I'll be the first to admit I was wrong, dude.
my friend..you bring nothing to the table as usual......sentrido said:nothing new here.
ah ha ha ha....i try to nurture an educated opinion...by doing this it requires me to access both sides of an issue...and then i determine the information's credibility and make a decision as to who is credible and who isn't......i see you people for the most part go with one side...right sentrido???right KC?KCFlyer said:Couldn't help but notice the article was from Newsmax. Why is it that when someone cites an article on CNN, the "source" is blasted as a left wing liberal news rag, but Newsmax is considered an unbiased source of 'truth'?
I'd believe that statement if I'd have ever read even ONE of your posts where you had something positive to say about Bill Clinton or John Kerry. Alas, I suppose being "educated" means that it's okay if your views are solely to the far right.delldude said:ah ha ha ha....i try to nurture an educated opinion...by doing this it requires me to access both sides of an issue...and then i determine the information's credibility and make a decision as to who is credible and who isn't......i see you people for the most part go with one side...right sentrido???right KC?