Do You Want To Re- Elect Bush For Presendent!

[mweiss]

http://www.thememoryhole.org/911/bush-911.htm

You need to remember that the "leader of the free world" was not in Florida at the time. 😉

 

[sentrido]

http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/analysis/to...hell/index.html

 

[Superjames]

George Bush isn't the best president I have ever seen, but he's alot better than John Kerry. So vote either George bush or preferably the Libertarian candidate (forgot his name)! But watever, do not, I repeat do not vote John Kerry or Ralph Nader for President.

 

[RJcasualty]

http://www.back-to-iraq.com/

 

[NeedForSpeedNFS]

Ahem...local - So far W hasn't sent troops over to Saudi Arabia in response to their government providing them with amnesty. Saudi's are our friends...remember? Let's see if ol' Cowboy W sends the troops against the Saudi's....like he said...yer either fer us or agin us. My money says we do nothing to the Saudi's other than tell them how bad it is.

Ahem....KC, for the record, YOUR PRESIDENT said, "In the GLOBAL war on terrorism, your either with us, or against us" What part of that don't you understand???? Get over your hatred of GW, and get with the program, you fool!!!!!!! Was that clear enough?? Now..................... my famous, trusty pic, just for you, my country bumkin................................

 

[RJcasualty]

I don't hate George W. Bush, but I cannot abide the damage he has done to the country.

I have nothing against Bush as a person, but his policies drive me to distraction.

I'd wouldn't poison Bush even if I had the chance, but unfortunately the Bush Administration has manipulated environmental regulations in a way that will poison millions of Americans.

I'm sure George W. Bush would be fun to watch football games with, but he has repeatedly demonstrated that he is out of his element when running the country.

I admire Bush for kicking drinking, but I didn't appreciate the ethics he demonstrated in trashing Clinton for an episode of oral sex while hiding his record of drunk driving.

While George W. Bush sure has a friendly smile, he led our nation to war under false pretenses.

I wish George W. Bush happiness as a person, but the fact remains that tens of thousands of innocent Iraqis are dead as a consequence of his impatience with diplomacy.

It's hard to hate someone you've never met, but it's easy to find fault with the Bush Administration's policy of cutting funds to social programs for America's neediest while draining the budget for tax cuts to the America's wealthiest.

Good for George that he seems to be happily married to his wife, Laura, but it's a shame that he pushes his own limited vision of happiness on people who are doing him no harm by keeping gay and lesbian people in love from getting married.

I respect George W. Bush's right to believe whatever story he wants to about Jesus and God, but I deeply resent his repeated attempts to shove his religion down other Americans' throats.

George can really be charming when he tells a joke, but the more than 2 million jobs lost during his tenure is no joke.

I wish George W. Bush a long and happy life after he leaves the Oval Office, but his lack of support for any action to stop the real decline in the minimum wage will shorten the lives of kids whose parents work at minimum-wage jobs.

I find gullible people to be kind of sweet on an interpersonal basis, but George W. Bush might have tried to check up on the wildly fictional claims of Iraqi exiles before marching other people's kids into battle.

While I can appreciate the joy of spontaneity, the Bush administration's lack of a plan for post-war Iraq had dire consequences.

George W. Bush can do whatever he wants to with his life -- bully for him. But I don't like the way he's ignored the Constitutional freedoms of others.

 

[KCFlyer]

Ahem....KC, for the record, YOUR PRESIDENT said, "In the GLOBAL war on terrorism, your either with us, or against us" What part of that don't you understand???? Get over your hatred of GW, and get with the program, you fool!!!!!!! Was that clear enough?? Now..................... my famous, trusty pic, just for you, my country bumkin................................

So let me get this straight...this old country bumpkin is a little confused. To this old bumpkin, any country offering amnesty to terrorists....ANY terrorists...comes across as being "against us". Does this administration somehow interpret that action as being "with us"? Would you be so kind as to fill in the poor ignorant fool as to how this is so? And you're right, my president (unfortunatly, he is my president) has said "you're either with us or against us". Yet we haven't sent one troop over to Saudi Arabia to punish those who would be willing to provide amnesty to any terrorist who came forward. I mean, we attacked a country without any proven connection to Al Queda, only assurances that "we knew" (and they have yet to prove outside of some "six degrees of separation" scenario.) Here we have a country saying "Come to us within the next 30 days and all is forgiven". And we do nothing.

So please, instead of posting pictures of yourself with your head up your a$$, and insults to my intelligence, why not help out your fellow American citizen (and yes, those of us who oppose Bush and his policies are still Americans) and explain how our inaction towards a country that offers amnesty to admitted terrorists is any different from our attacking a country that we believed had terrorist connections.

Thanks in advance for your "help".

 

[RJcasualty]

William F. Buckley's gift to the "National Review" upon his retirement: "If I knew then what I know now about what kind of situation we'd be in, I would have opposed this war..."

 

[sentrido]

WOW!

from the article:
"Six months ago, MoveOn.org held a contest to find the best amateur ad against President Bush. The group invited people to make ads and submit them to its Web site. Some idiot spliced images of Bush together with images of Adolf Hitler, evidently trying to make Bush look like a warmonger. His submissions, which arrived with 1,500 others—too many to be screened quickly—were posted on the contest Web site. As soon as MoveOn.org leaders realized what was in the ad, they removed and denounced it.

The Bush campaign, outraged by the mixture of Nazi images with images of an American politician, has decided that the best response to this offense is to repeat it.

The Bush video's opening white-on-black graphic says, "The Faces of John Kerry's Democratic Party. The Coalition of the Wild-eyed." Next comes a parade of angry speakers: Al Gore, Hitler, Howard Dean, Michael Moore, Dick Gephardt, Hitler, Gore, and Kerry.

Is Bush suggesting that Hitler fits in with this group? Don't be silly, Jake. Bush's aides insist they're just showing the Hitler footage so you can see the filth Democrats are putting out. But we already know how Bush's GOP presents images from Democratic ads when it wants to discredit them. In 2000, Republican National Committee ads repeatedly depicted Al Gore's commercials running on a small television screen in a kitchen. The RNC ads didn't show the Gore ads at full size on your screen because the RNC didn't want the images in the Gore ads to be taken at face value.

This time, the Bush campaign shows the Hitler images at full size, in an unexplained sequence with Gore, Dean, Gephardt, and Kerry. Draw your own conclusions."

Wow. I guess If you can put pictures of Max Cleland next to Osamma bin laden, you can do anything. HITLER?. Do you really think the liberals in the country really feel that W can be compared to hitler? Do you really think it is appropraite to splice an image of hitler next to John Kerry's in an offical add? Can any of you conservative kids really defend this?
Democrats didnt put this stuff out! Some A hole put it out. And when it was found, It was removed.

 

[TWAnr]

Ahem....KC, for the record, YOUR PRESIDENT said, "In the GLOBAL war on terrorism, your either with us, or against us" What part of that don't you understand???? Get over your hatred of GW, and get with the program, you fool!!!!!!! Was that clear enough?? Now..................... my famous, trusty pic, just for you, my country bumkin................................

It is time to repeat some of President Theodore Roosevelt wise words:

The President is merely the most important among a large number of public servants. He should be supported or opposed exactly to the degree which is warranted by his good conduct or bad conduct, his efficiency or inefficiency in rendering loyal, able, and disinterested service to the nation as a whole. Therefore it is absolutely necessary that there should be full liberty to tell the truth about his acts, and this means that it is exactly as necessary to blame him when he does wrong as to praise him when he does right. Any other attitude in an American citizen is both base and servile. To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public. Nothing but the truth should be spoken about him or any one else. But it is even more important to tell the truth, pleasant or unpleasant, about him than about any one else.

And:

Patriotism means to stand by the country. It does not mean to stand by the President or any other public official save exactly to the degree in which he himself stands by the country. It is patriotic to support him insofar as he efficiently serves the country. It is unpatriotic not to oppose him to the exact extent that by inefficiency or otherwise he fails in his duty to stand by the country.

 

[delldude]

JUST IN TIME FOR THE ELECTION:

 

[KCFlyer]

Oddly enough DellDude...when I went to that link I found this in a box for sponsored links in the middle of the article

Build a Better America with the RNC
You can be a part of the team working with President Bush and a Republican Congress to fully enact their compassionate conservative agenda. Learn how you can help promote our message today.

Guess I'll just call that my 'grain of salt'.

 

[sentrido]

JUST IN TIME FOR THE ELECTION:

"The White House has maintained it lacks hard evidence to back Nayouf's reports of Iraqi WMDs smuggled to Syria.

"I want to be very clear: We don't, at this point, have any indications that I would consider credible and firm that that has taken place. But we will tie down every lead," National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice told reporters in Washington on Jan. 10, 2004.

"

Unlike Iraq, Syria actually has WMDs. Its own WMDs. So does everybody else in the middle east. Why arent we going after them?

 

[sentrido]

from the main page:

WHISTLEBLOWER MAGAZINE
WorldNetDaily Exclusive
The role of Iraq, Israel, USA in Bible prophecy
Limited time, get Michael Evans' stunning bestseller 'Beyond Iraq' FREE!
--WND

Wow.

 

[RJcasualty]

Dubyuh had a brain storm in Istanbul: "Some people in Muslim cultures identify democracy with the worst of Western popular culture and want no part of it. And I assure them, when I speak about the blessings of liberty, coarse videos and crass commercialism are not what I have in mind."