What's new

fleet

Probably not since you are not under the East CBA yet, but once you are the rates of pay and etc will apply.
 
If you ask me the arbitration hurts the west employees. Reasons: outsorcing will occur if the arbitration happens there will be no flexibility. We are stuck without our holidays, sicktime, vacations, short-term disability that are currently superior. We get nothing but money that will go to the SKY HIGH Ins costs that the East currently pay. If it gets settled out of arbitration there could be things in the transition talks that save some field stations bring vacations to reasonable years of service and holidays and sicktime. And also raise pay at the same time. for both sides. If all you people care about is money and not brothers in sisters in Field Stations than you are not a true UNION BROTHER/SISTER.
 
QUESTION FOR THE EAST ... will this arbitraction do anything for those of us on the WEST , will WE get back pay from the moment we signed our IAM cards thereby becoming IAM members???
the arbitration award benefits the 'active' east employees immediately with big wage gains, retro pay of thousands per employee, and guarantees 3% annual raises until a new agreement. In fact the wage snapback would already have 3% tacked on.

It affects the westies directly in that they are in section 6 negotiations already and having the east making tons more will strengthen the westie hand.

regards,
 
There west is not in section 6 negotiations, the TWU is no longer is their certified representative. They are working under their old TUW CBA until a transition agreement is negotiated.

The former AMTs under the IBT were in Section 6 before the merger.
 
From my understanding we would get the entire contract back if the judge rules in our favor. That means everything in the 99 contract. Which is superior to both of the current contracts. So its not just money.
I fear the company is just negotiating until the judge rules. Than if they win they discontinue to negotiate.
We go back to square 1 and we continue to work under seperate work rules until 2009 and inferior pay.
 
I can't find a thing on the website but the shop stewards told us tonight that the company went to Judge Mitchell to file an injunction .I guess to keep this thing from going to arbitration. I consider it rumor till I see something offical.
 
There is no judge, the Change of Control Arbitration is for the IAM/US East Fleet and M&R CBAs. The Arbitor hearing the grievance is Richard Bloch.

It has nothing to do with anything on the west, it only applies to East and the rates of pay and raises.

Judge Mitchell cannot rule on the CBA, he all ready approved it with the Change of Control Language.

The company is not in Chapter 11 anymore, he has nothing to do with the CBA and the Grievance Procedure.
 
Same old garbage , all talks are confidential and nothing can be dislosed.Don't we deserve better ?
 
Frank was not an GC at the time, and it was Bill who should have called CLT instead of having secret conference calls with the company.

The IAM is going forward with the arbitration it is to be held next week in PHX, why are you saying they are not?
700,
You must be confused, I did'nt comment on the arbitration issue, I commented on the bungled Force Majeur Issue.
 
There is no judge, the Change of Control Arbitration is for the IAM/US East Fleet and M&R CBAs. The Arbitor hearing the grievance is Richard Bloch.

It has nothing to do with anything on the west, it only applies to East and the rates of pay and raises.

Judge Mitchell cannot rule on the CBA, he all ready approved it with the Change of Control Language.

The company is not in Chapter 11 anymore, he has nothing to do with the CBA and the Grievance Procedure.

700 that's what I was thinking but more than one person told me this. Oh well maybe the same person started one rumor. But the one thing they all had in common was that the company walked.
 
700 that's what I was thinking but more than one person told me this. Oh well maybe the same person started one rumor. But the one thing they all had in common was that the company walked.
From what I understand, 700 is correct on the arbitration.
Where is the company gonna walk? They have agreed to the arbitration.
 
700,
You must be confused, I did'nt comment on the arbitration issue, I commented on the bungled Force Majeur Issue.
Read the post again.

The top part is for you and the bottom is a comment on this TOPIC, not you straying off topic.
 
:up: This is the time the IAM can take back every contracted out fleet service station. Strength is in numbers.
 
Read the post again.

The top part is for you and the bottom is a comment on this TOPIC, not you straying off topic.
700, Just another one of your meaningless, confused replies. :blink:
 

Latest posts

Back
Top