What's new
By:

Gay Marriage

Status
Not open for further replies.
La Li Lu Le Lo said:
Can you prove the people getting divorced actually share the political views representative of the state?
 
I find it funny that this PROOF of yours only covers 2008. Why not do that same analysis over a 10 or 20 year period?
Click to expand...
It has to do with averages and statistics.  Something other people learn in school.  Perhaps you can find someone to help you understand it.  I'm not going to waste my time.
 
I did not do the analysis.  Feel free to find your own studies.  
 
Ms Tree said:
It has to do with averages and statistics.  Something other people learn in school.  Perhaps you can find someone to help you understand it.  I'm not going to waste my time.
 
I did not do the analysis.  Feel free to find your own studies.  
Click to expand...
Again, why limit it to one year?
 
I guess you don't have an answer for that.
 
 
Again, can you prove the people getting divorced actually share the political views representative of the state?
 
If you are going to try to tie political outlook to divorce rates should you not carry the burden of proving the divorcees in question actually share that viewpoint or at least a large percentage of them?
 
I guess you don't have an answer for that either.
 
 
Here is another question for you. Why would anybody even publish a "study" like this except to push a political agenda?
 
Answer that one.
 
 
The truth is this "study" is not worth the time it took you to hyperlink to it. It is fluff and not even researched correctly. This is just another example of a libtard submitting "proof" then getting offended if you ask them to back their claim because they know the claim is B.S.. They depend on the mental laziness of the average liberal voter to just accept what they are told. Ms Tree is a PRIME example of that.
 
La Li Lu Le Lo said:
Again, why limit it to one year?
 
I guess you don't have an answer for that.
 
 
Again, can you prove the people getting divorced actually share the political views representative of the state?
 
If you are going to try to tie political outlook to divorce rates should you not carry the burden of proving the divorcees in question actually share that viewpoint or at least a large percentage of them?
 
I guess you don't have an answer for that either.
 
 
Here is another question for you. Why would anybody even publish a "study" like this except to push a political agenda?
 
Answer that one.
 
 
The truth is this "study" is not worth the time it took you to hyperlink to it. It is fluff and not even researched correctly. This is just another example of a libtard submitting "proof" then getting offended if you ask them to back their claim because they know the claim is B.S.. They depend on the mental laziness of the average liberal voter to just accept what they are told. Ms Tree is a PRIME example of that.
Click to expand...
As for the first two questions, the answers do not change because you ask it again.

As to why it was published. My guess is it was done to prove that people who talk about the sanctity of marriage are dead wrong.

Reading about you judging what is or is not valid research is good for a laugh but not much else.
 
http://www.lex18.com/story/29910297/clerk-asks-us-supreme-court-to-intervene-in-marriage-case

Here is the county clerk in Rowan County, Kentucky that says she cannot have a marriage license with her name on it since it is against here deeply held Christian beliefs.

She has also been married FOUR times. She makes $80,000 a year in a very poor county where the median salary is about $30,000 year. She says she will not resign.

So now she goes to same court (and the same justice) that ruled that same sex marriage is constitutional expecting a different result.

I hope she is held in contempt and fined and or jailed for failing to uphold her oath to serve. And her comparison to being a conciensious objector is highly insulting to those who served in wars for our country.
 
She has wasted so much time and money for a case that has no hope in suceeding. I would not be surprised if Kagan denied the case outright.

Sad thing is when she is slapped with contempt she will waste even more time in court. I hope they put her in jail for contempt and don't fine her. You know her crazy supporters will pay her fines, at least for a while. If she is in jail she might changer her tune and either do her job or resign. State legislature won't do anything because they are as clueless as she is.
 
The SCOTUS has ruled against her frivolous writ. Imagine that. The state may end up paying for her quest for backwoods noteriety.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/reckoning-nears-clerk-resisting-same-sex-marriage-ruling-202230268.html

My bet is that she does not have the religious conviction to follow through and go to jail or pay fines. She will start issuing the licenses and keep her job $80,0000/year, or will suck the dumbasses out of all the money she can to support her cause while collecting alimony from her previous three husbands...all on principle (puke).
 
My fear is that the judge will just fine her instead of holding her in contempt and putting her in jail till she does her job or resigns. If the judge just fines her I'm sure her fines will be paid by various conservatives who do not believe in the COTUS. If Davis lands in jail that will be a different story. I wonder if she still gets paid while in jail?

I am glad Kagen forwarded the appeal to the entire court. At least this way the idiots supporting Davis cannot blame it on Kagen.
 
Glenn Quagmire said:
http://www.lex18.com/story/29910297/clerk-asks-us-supreme-court-to-intervene-in-marriage-case

Here is the county clerk in Rowan County, Kentucky that says she cannot have a marriage license with her name on it since it is against here deeply held Christian beliefs.

She has also been married FOUR times. She makes $80,000 a year in a very poor county where the median salary is about $30,000 year. She says she will not resign.

So now she goes to same court (and the same justice) that ruled that same sex marriage is constitutional expecting a different result.

I hope she is held in contempt and fined and or jailed for failing to uphold her oath to serve. And her comparison to being a conciensious objector is highly insulting to those who served in wars for our country.
Click to expand...
 
I couldn't find a reference to being 'CO' and how you equate that to serving in the military.
 
And you want her penalized for what? She has no protections under the Constitution regarding "free exercise thereof" ?
 
Who is to decide whether she is right or wrong here without due process?
 
Ms Tree said:
She has wasted so much time and money for a case that has no hope in suceeding. I would not be surprised if Kagan denied the case outright.

Sad thing is when she is slapped with contempt she will waste even more time in court. I hope they put her in jail for contempt and don't fine her. You know her crazy supporters will pay her fines, at least for a while. If she is in jail she might changer her tune and either do her job or resign. State legislature won't do anything because they are as clueless as she is.
Click to expand...
 
Justice Kennedy said it coming out of the gay marriage ruling, these people also enjoy equal protection as much as gays under the Constitution for their religious convictions. As to what level religious convictions hold, that will be decided with due process.
 
Glenn Quagmire said:
The SCOTUS has ruled against her frivolous writ. Imagine that. The state may end up paying for her quest for backwoods noteriety.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/reckoning-nears-clerk-resisting-same-sex-marriage-ruling-202230268.html

My bet is that she does not have the religious conviction to follow through and go to jail or pay fines. She will start issuing the licenses and keep her job $80,0000/year, or will suck the dumbasses out of all the money she can to support her cause while collecting alimony from her previous three husbands...all on principle (puke).
Click to expand...
 
Its heading to the Supreme Court for a ruling. It isn't going to be the only case. Religion holds equal favor to gay marriage. This isn't over by any means.
 
Ms Tree said:
My fear is that the judge will just fine her instead of holding her in contempt and putting her in jail till she does her job or resigns. If the judge just fines her I'm sure her fines will be paid by various conservatives who do not believe in the COTUS. If Davis lands in jail that will be a different story. I wonder if she still gets paid while in jail?
Click to expand...
 
You fear is a ruling that goes against your anti religious views.
 
delldude said:
I couldn't find a reference to being 'CO' and how you equate that to serving in the military.
 
And you want her penalized for what? She has no protections under the Constitution regarding "free exercise thereof" ?
 
Click to expand...
"“Like a noncombatant who cannot shoulder a rifle, a county clerk who cannot issue” same-sex licenses “can still faithfully and devotedly serve this country, and their county,” lawyers for Kim Davis argued in a pleading filed Thursday in U.S. District Court. Asking Judge David Bunning to deny an injunction forcing Davis to begin issuing licenses again, attorneys Roger Gannam and Jonathan Christman from the Orlando-based Liberty Counsel note that Kentucky law allows county clerks an exemption from issuing fishing and hunting licenses. “If Kentucky is able to accommodate personal beliefs and conscientious objection regarding something that is (to some) as trivial as fishing and hunting, surely Kentucky can and must provide similar accommodation for deeply held beliefs about the fundamental nature of marriage,” they said in their pleading."

And her free exercise is her freedom to not do her job that she swore to do by resigning or issuing the licenses. Simple.
 
She needs to see the inside of a jail cell.

I really don't understand her lawyers. Their arguments are so off the wall they don't even me sense. She is a public servant. Don't want to do the job then you quit. No one gets to pick and choose the rules/laws they disagree with. She volunteered for the job. Do it or leave.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

EastCheats
Canada sees America's ideological divide
Replies
1
Views
1K
EastCheats
EastCheats
F
Can Congress force me to buy health insurance?
Replies
0
Views
848
Freedom4all
F
L
McCain vs Romney
Replies
12
Views
2K
NewHampshire Black Bears
N
J
To be a Republican
Replies
1
Views
1K
RDU Jetblast
R
Garfield1966
Lovely, the religious nut jobs are at it again
Replies
9
Views
1K
NewHampshire Black Bears
N

Latest posts

Back
Top