What's new

Giuliani Speaks

tech2101

Veteran
Joined
Aug 14, 2006
Messages
3,655
Reaction score
1,197
Location
Reality
Is this the republican front runner? Geez.

"So it would seem to me that we should have organized ourselves so that we could accomplish in Iraq what we had to accomplish without taking anything away from accomplishing in Afghanistan and Pakistan what we had to accomplish.â€￾ :blink:

NY Times July 19, 2007, 2:06 pm
 
But...did we accomplish what we had set out to accomplish

without accomplishing what we already had tried to accomplish?
 
But...did we accomplish what we had set out to accomplish

without accomplishing what we already had tried to accomplish?


Now that would be the best accomplishment of all the accomplishments accomplished so far.
 
Here is something I can get behind: Giuliani is on the stump declaring that he best embodies his party's principles of free markets, low taxes and limited spending.

Although it will be difficult to develop a limited spending government while we are in the middle of a war, I do appreciate a candidate who touts controlled spending and supply-side economics.
 
I'll vote for Giuliani if he's against Hillary. 🙄
What a bunch of 'looser' choices we have... :down:

It's looking like another Alfred E. Newman vote again. :down:
 
Its truly pathetic to see the caliber of presidential material we have to choose from thus for!

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

"12",
Hillary aside, with you being in OKIE-HOMA, I don't guess you have many occasions to refer to anything that pertains to the states of Connecticut, or Delaware.

WITHOUT question, Sen. Joseph Biden D/DE. could lead this country(from every aspect) from Day 1 !!

And I could make a good case for Sen, Chris Dodd D/CT, and Gov. Bill Richardson D/NM.

But From the GOP side, your Definitely right.

Guliani...........Shet, even the NYC Firemen wont endorse him.

Poor OLD John McCain(I kinda like him), his backing of EL CHIMPOS Iraq ABORTION...(200%) has him D.O.A. before the first ballot is cast.

Huck' and Brownie.back, have to get permission from James Dobson, as to when to "take a SHET" !!!!

Romney needs similiar permission, from the GRAVE of Brigham Young.

Fred Thompson has ALREADY figured out...why he was hesitant to throw his hat in earlier :shock:

But fear not.........You guys still have fellow "TEX-A$$-AN" ....RON PAUL :blink: :blink: :blink:
 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

"12",
Hillary aside, with you being in OKIE-HOMA, I don't guess you have many occasions to refer to anything that pertains to the states of Connecticut, or Delaware.

Why you always dissin Oklahoma Bears? For someone who seems to have a close affinity to the Native Americans you sure seem to berate the place that has the largest concentration of Tribes.

WITHOUT question, Sen. Joseph Biden D/DE. could lead this country(from every aspect) from Day 1 !!

And I could make a good case for Sen, Chris Dodd D/CT, and Gov. Bill Richardson D/NM.

But From the GOP side, your Definitely right.

Guliani...........Shet, even the NYC Firemen wont endorse him.

Poor OLD John McCain(I kinda like him), his backing of EL CHIMPOS Iraq ABORTION...(200%) has him D.O.A. before the first ballot is cast.

Huck' and Brownie.back, have to get permission from James Dobson, as to when to "take a SHET" !!!!

Romney needs similiar permission, from the GRAVE of Brigham Young.

Fred Thompson has ALREADY figured out...why he was hesitant to throw his hat in earlier :shock:

Thought I made it clear, Im tossin my vote away on the Independent ticket! 😱

But fear not.........You guys still have fellow "TEX-A$$-AN" ....RON PAUL :blink: :blink: :blink:

Ron who?...... :lol:

Sooners/Wildcats.......Lets rumble!!!!!!!! 😀
 
Here is something I can get behind: Giuliani is on the stump declaring that he best embodies his party's principles of free markets, low taxes and limited spending.

Although it will be difficult to develop a limited spending government while we are in the middle of a war, I do appreciate a candidate who touts controlled spending and supply-side economics.

Well from my view as a somewhat right of the middle rabid populist, I ruled him out right away. All the worst part of supply-side plutocracy, yet right in there with the liberal nanny-state busybodies that aspire to make the drinking age 55 and the speed limit 21: The worst of everything. Despite his protestations to the contrary, his past views are/were well known as a gun-grabber as well. Not a conservative beyond the "anything for a buck", corporate concubine, free-market fundamentalism that has assailed the middle/working class with such viciousness ( "class warfare" indeed ) the last 2 decades. The final straw is his position on illegal immigration gets a big zero....no, make that a negative 2.
 
Ron Paul

He has never voted to raise taxes.
He has never voted for an unbalanced budget.
He has never voted for a federal restriction on gun ownership.
He has never voted to raise congressional pay.
He has never taken a government-paid junket.
He has never voted to increase the power of the executive branch.

He voted against the Patriot Act.
He voted against regulating the Internet.
He voted against the Iraq war.

He does not participate in the lucrative congressional pension program.
He returns a portion of his annual congressional office budget to the U.S. treasury every year.

Congressman Paul introduces numerous pieces of substantive legislation each year, probably more than any single member of Congress

Maybe there is something to Ron... :up:
 

Latest posts

Back
Top