What's new

GOP's (constant) " NO - NO - NO " reward

tom barry

Veteran
Joined
Aug 20, 2011
Messages
863
Reaction score
127
Without a SCINTILLA of Republican Bi-partisanship on the horizon/coming from the GOP Congress, President Obama makes recess appointments.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/04/obama-nlrb-recess-appointments-labor-unions_n_1184285.html

There was NOTHING wrong with this man from Ohio/Cordrey !
Screw with the BULL, you get the "HORN's" !!!!!!!!!!
 
This is the same president who was found in contempt of court over his executive order on the drilling ban, so I'm not at all surprised that he'd do a recess appointment and bypass due-process.

Third-hand, it's said that Obama's strategy for his last year in will be mostly executive actions that do not need approval from Congress... Ironic that a former Constitutional law lecturer would have such contempt for the Constitution...
 
Republicans are hypocrites:

President Obama Has Made Far Fewer Recess Appointments Than Any Recent President | Despite the inevitable conservative complaints that President Obama is engaged in some kind of massive overreach by recess appointing Richard Cordray as the nation’s chief consumer financial protection watchdog, the truth is that Obama has used his recess appointment power very sparingly. After today’s appointment, President Obama will have made a total of 29 recess appointments. By comparison, George W. Bush made 171 recess appointments; Bill Clinton made 139 recess appointments; George H.W. Bush made 77 recess appointments; and Ronald Reagan made 243. When you divide these numbers by the number of years each man spent in the White House, it reveals that Obama is far and away the least likely president to invoke this power:
 
This is the same president who was found in contempt of court over his executive order on the drilling ban, so I'm not at all surprised that he'd do a recess appointment and bypass due-process.

Third-hand, it's said that Obama's strategy for his last year in will be mostly executive actions that do not need approval from Congress... Ironic that a former Constitutional law lecturer would have such contempt for the Constitution...
the President shall have Power to fill up all Vacancies that may happen during the Recess of the Senate, by granting Commissions which shall expire at the End of their next Session.

Can you please explain to the class how abiding by the Constitution is having contempt for said document? Then there is the little issue mentioned above tat Obama has only made 29 appointment thus far. I am sure given the numbers you must have utter disdain for Regan huh?

You should really stick to the airline stuff which you seem to be far more proficient at. Politics does not seem to be your strong suit.

Seems the republicans do not like the legislation so they are trying to do an end run on it. Perhaps they need to sit down have someone read the COTUS to them as they seem to have difficulty understanding how things work and what their job function is.

A Republican Doubles-Down on Nullification
Maybe it's something about being a U.S. Senator from South Carolina. Today on Meet the Press, Sen. Lindsey Graham flat-out declared the Republican intention to nullify the already-passed legislation to establish a Consumer Finance Protection Bureau. According to the transcript, with emphasis added:

So this consumer bureau that they want to pass is under the Federal Reserve. No appropriation oversight, no board. It is something out of the Stalinist era.

The reason Republicans don't want to vote for it is we want a board, not one person, making all the regulatory decisions, and there's no oversight under this person. He gets a check from the Federal Reserve. We want him under the Congress so we can oversee the overseer.

It is embarrassing but apparently necessary to point out that the bureau has already passed, it is the law of the land, and if the Republicans "don't want to vote for it" or "want" it run a different way, their option under the Constitution is to change the legislation or restrict the bureau's funding. Instead they are acting as if the established rules for "how a Bill becomes a Law" do not apply if they do not "want" them to.
 
And speaking of 'contempt of court'.

GOP candidates: Bashing judges, threatening democracy
The attack on the federal judiciary by Republican candidates for president has reached a new low and should be denounced by liberals and conservatives alike. In November, Texas Gov. Rick Perry announced that if elected president, his "appointees to the federal bench will not receive a lifetime appointment."Now Newt Gingrich has pledged that if he were elected he would defy Supreme Court rulings with which he disagreed and that judicial review to ensure that the government complies with the Constitution has been "grossly overstated."

I am not a legal scholar but I am willing to bet that defying or ignoring a Federal court ruling will come with some penalties. Gingrich does not seem to bright for a scholar. Then there is Perry. Perhaps someone should tell him that he will need to amend the COTUS before he can start giving federal judges term limits.

Where do you guys find these idiots?
 
Republicans are hypocrites:

No I think you are the hypocrite....

Did all you cited do it while Senate was still in session in violation of protocol/procedure thus setting the stage for illegal appointments??

Obama is an ass.

This is a usurping of the checks and balances between branches of power of our Constitution.....or don't you need it anymore?
 
Can you please explain to the class how abiding by the Constitution is having contempt for said document? Then there is the little issue mentioned above tat Obama has only made 29 appointment thus far. I am sure given the numbers you must have utter disdain for Regan huh?

You should really stick to the airline stuff which you seem to be far more proficient at. Politics does not seem to be your strong suit.

Seems the republicans do not like the legislation so they are trying to do an end run on it. Perhaps they need to sit down have someone read the COTUS to them as they seem to have difficulty understanding how things work and what their job function is.

A Republican Doubles-Down on Nullification


Dude...you miss the point that both houses have to be in recess?

Maybe you need to read COTUS?

So now the dictator decides what the law of the land shall be by decree....

Told you so.... :lol:
 
I think what the administration is challenging is that a pro-forma session that lasts more than three days is a recess.

We will see how it plays out.

Running against a congress that is only liked by freinds and family members (of congress) is probably a good strategy right now.

That too, we shall see.
 
I think what the administration is challenging is that a pro-forma session that lasts more than three days is a recess.

We will see how it plays out.

Running against a congress that is only liked by freinds and family members (of congress) is probably a good strategy right now.

That too, we shall see.

No separation of powers when there’s an election that needs to be won, I’m afraid. Serious question: Doesn’t Reid, as majority leader, have some control over whether any pro forma sessions are called in the first place? If so, why didn’t he simply refuse to let any be called? That would have strengthened Obama’s argument that the Senate’s in a true recess, not merely some sort of de facto recess where pro forma sessions don’t really count. (Strengthened but not necessarily vindicated, that is.)

My link


I think you mean running for re-election now that both houses can't forward the progressive agenda that was his steamroller now sucks and he will do a run around on the Constitution.
You know, like "natural born".

He is an ass.......and he is demonstrating why we have/need a separation of powers.

But it sounds like its ok by you.....
 
No I think you are the hypocrite....

Did all you cited do it while Senate was still in session in violation of protocol/procedure thus setting the stage for illegal appointments??

Obama is an ass.

This is a usurping of the checks and balances between branches of power of our Constitution.....or don't you need it anymore?



Look !
BOTH sides have played this game FOREVER, and i doubt it will stop anytime soon.

But every once in a while, a squeaky clean man/woman gets nominated and get's SHAFTED purely because of Politics. This time it's the REPUGS. who are looking like arse HOLES.

This guy Cordray has got recommendations up the ying-yang from OHIO liberals AND conservatives alike.
I WANT a guy like him....Busting Pay Day lenders and credit card Banks from charging MAFIA like interest charges.

Sorry dell, ..It IS what it IS !!!
 
Look !
BOTH sides have played this game FOREVER, and i doubt it will stop anytime soon.

But every once in a while, a squeaky clean man/woman gets nominated and get's SHAFTED purely because of Politics. This time it's the REPUGS. who are looking like arse HOLES.

This guy Cordray has got recommendations up the ying-yang from OHIO liberals AND conservatives alike.
I WANT a guy like him....Busting Pay Day lenders and credit card Banks from charging MAFIA like interest charges.

Sorry dell, ..It IS what it IS !!!


You can document GOP recess appointments while Senate not in recess?

You right here and now support going around the Constitution?

El Douche Bag is an ass.....

obama-fascist.jpg
 
I think what the administration is challenging is that a pro-forma session that lasts more than three days is a recess.

We will see how it plays out.

Running against a congress that is only liked by freinds and family members (of congress) is probably a good strategy right now.

That too, we shall see.

Running against a Congress?

That is the election strategy?

What happened to whats good for you , me and the rest of the country?

He lost one branch and now its the reason for his campaign?

Hell this is great copy.

Overheard in stall three at work the other day...

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.), who previously held pro forma sessions to block recess appointments by President George W. Bush, said Wednesday he supported President Obama's decision to ignore those sessions to push through one of his key nominees.
 
The Pro Forma BS that the Dems pulled on Bush in 2006/7 is the same BS the republicans are pulling now. I'm glad Obama called them on it. May be the courts will weigh in on this and settle it.
 
Back
Top