funguy2 said:
Gosh... I hardly know where to begin...
Yield premium at FLL vs. MCO? I am not sure that is very big... Both are large leisure destinations - translation low yield.
Concourse C at MCO? Huh? Last time I checked they had Airsides 1-4 and an A and B side to the main passenger terminal. Do you mean the completion of Airside 4 (about 10 gates)? I have heard that MCO evenually plans aniother duplicate terminal (presumably C/D ares of a central terminal and Airsides 5-8 at full build out...) but I have never heard of a "Concourse C" at MCO.
Just because LUV is not at MIA is no reason to keep JB out. That certainly wasn't the rationale at JFK and others. I think the local traffic on JFK-MIA is huge, and JB would do well. MIA as a spoke and FLL as a focus city could do well for JB... seems to work for AA in reverse. JFK-MIA would also take on AA/UA, which JB seems to do well with (i.e. LGB, OAK, SJU). But MIA will probably not overtake FLL at JB's So.Fla. home. FLL is the low-cost prefered airport in So.Fla. I don't expect that to change.
I would be concerned if JB starts flying FLL-BUF/ROC/SYR. I would imagine those markets sizes to be small and low yield. They would do well to continue to funnel pax through JFK. I am sure that JB already gets its fair share of pax on these routes on a connecting basis. Even if they added nonstops, they would be extremely seasonal. I think JB has bigger fish to fry than FLL-SYR.
Yield premium at FLL vs. MCO? I am not sure that is very big... Both are large leisure destinations - translation low yield
Yeah, there are yield premiums. I'm not calling Ft. Lauderdale a huge money making market. It makes money for many carriers, but it's no New York City. However, it is a lot heavier on the business traffic...Office Depot, FPL, ANC Auto Rental, AutoNation, Citrix Systems, TriArc...than Orlando is.
I think the local traffic on JFK-MIA is huge, and JB would do well. MIA as a spoke and FLL as a focus city could do well for JB... seems to work for AA in reverse.
Totally agree. There is no better example of an airline making use of one of thier hub's secondary airports than what AA does at MIA. This winter, AA will offer up to 38 daily flights from Ft. Lauderdale not only to thier Dallas, O'Hare, San Juan, and St. Louis hubs, but also to Boston, Caracas, LaGuardia, Los Angeles, Nassau, Port-Au-Prince, Raleigh-Durham, and Santo Domingo, which are some of AA's biggest O&D markets from MIA (FLL-LAX is now running at four daily flights on AA alone). jetBlue could do a great job and capitalize on what is thier second largest local customer base by offering them some options out of Miami to JFK.
I would be concerned if JB starts flying FLL-BUF/ROC/SYR. I would imagine those markets sizes to be small and low yield. They would do well to continue to funnel pax through JFK. I am sure that JB already gets its fair share of pax on these routes on a connecting basis. Even if they added nonstops, they would be extremely seasonal. I think JB has bigger fish to fry than FLL-SYR.
The Miami-SYR/ROC/BUF markets all have more than 300 O&D passengers per day. Buffalo is one of the largest O&D markets from Miami/Lauderdale not served non-stop, and visa-versa. FLL does have daily non-stop service to SYR, on a 757-200ER, that goes out full every single day. The market is huge between the Miami area, which has more New York state migrants than any other area in the country, and secondary New York cities. While demand is heavier in the winter, obviously, it is a strong year-round market just like South Florida-New York City is.