Tim, you mention Temps being one of the small items holding things up, and for the record, I have no problem with temps as long as they are on the ready to work once the OT lists are exhausted for both full and part time workers...along with Temps Tim, what else would you consider small that may be holding up negotiations. Would you be OK with another work group getting more sick time or vacation than our group? Would you trade catering and cargo for enhancements in other areas? What else is causing the delay?
I think we would have to start with what the CWA/IBT has and raise the bar from there. Compensation wise, they have more than us along all articles, and they were non contract just 9 months ago. So we should get more since we came to the table with a lot more than them. And the industry has changed more favorably since the CWA/IBT signed, although the revenue trend has already started to erode backwards.
So we know, by virtue of the company signing that agreement, that management is willing to enhance contracts and get things done. But it isn't a pushover and I think our hardline stance on temp agents has caused the company to drop the hammer on our poor negotiator souls. Our negotiators need to suck it up and get their S together and focus on the core things and stop D*ing around sweating the small stuff. Management snapped at them once and stalled talks, so hopefully our negotiators learned from the error of their ways that they can't get everything. Going 17 out of 17 was good but we all knew it wouldn't last.
In a disappointment, the CWA/IBT bit on the extra dues by bringing in new scab [union slang] members from another classification in the mix that was a win win for management and the CWA/IBT but not a win for the hard working members.
For the IAM/TWU to get a TA, that can be voted upon, it will have to change its paradigm and be willing to be progressive. I don't think that means losing catering. Contract (vendor) catering has been a disaster for the company, so our catering has been dependable and professional so I don't see any reason why we would lose it.
I myself am not in favor of losing anything that survived bankruptcy, i.e., catering, cargo. Why should we?
That said, walking away from the table tossing away full time protection and part time caps, like they did at United would be a disaster. Southwest airlines rampers with TWU have the best contract right now as they enhanced their scope of stations by bringing in more stations [although they had to cut many of the AirTran stations that were never protected]. Didn't like that they spiked the cargo quota but compromised to keep cargo work.
There is no reason to lose things that survived bankruptcy. Even the CWA/IBT got no layoff language at DOS. We should have that, better scope (in some capacity) and have part time cap language. Split the difference on some other items in both of the contracts, don't sweat the small stuff, and bring it to a vote. And if we have all other items TA'd but are stuck on the IAMPF, then find a quick solution.
We are up against time here. People ask why the stock is down but it is because of the revenue guidance. Europe is a disaster now with future bookings, so we know we are losing millions there now. Oil is ready to cross $50, up from $27 a few months ago. So the metrics are quickly changing. The window may be closing. If the window closes and we get hosed, then I'm going to stick these dopey updates up the elected officials arses and point to them sweating over the small items. To date, we have been D*ing around with the small things and haven't even bothered with the core items that we should have dug in over a year ago. Morons.