Have you always been pompous and arrogant?
I can't inquire as to what the terms of the deal are?????
But it's ok for the company to post my salary and benefits on AANEGOTIATIONS.COM for the enitire world to see......but I can't ask a simple question about a lease deal?????????????
Typical AArogance!
I guess, according to FWAAA, I am a lowlife peon worker and don't have the right to ask questions that matter only to important people. And lowlife workers such as myself could not possibly grasp all the BIG BOY FINANCE STUFF BECAUSE THAT IS ONLY FOR THE MASTERS OF THE UNIVERSE TO KNOW...
You know, Hopeful, I rarely tell people that they might want to seek anger management treatment, but your responses to my lighthearted reply convince me that you could probably benefit. Anyway, better for you to unleash your pent-up rage here and direct it at me rather than take it home and kick your dog (or worse). Glad to be of help.
Back to the topic:
All of us curious types would love to know the terms, of course, but I assumed that you know that neither AA nor leasing companies are going to tell us, just like AA and Boeing keep their purchase prices a closely guarded secret. Besides, I'm fairly confident that neither you nor me are competent to tell whether AA is getting a good deal even if AA did spell out the terms for us. All the leasing company is doing is loaning AA a few hundred million (perhaps even a billion) dollars and structuring the deal as a lease rather than a purchase and lien with notes and mortgages. Thing is, AA tells us about its borrowings (rates, terms, etc) in its SEC-mandated disclosures but doesn't have to be as explicit in describing its lease agreements.
Implicit in your post (as is often the case with many of the topics you begin) is the assumption that these lease agreements are made possible by your continuing concessions. Your subsequent posts in this thread confirm that was your real argument. As I've posted before, I don't see any connection between the new planes and your low wages. In fact, new fuel efficient planes might represent the best chance you have at getting future raises, as they will limit the amount of money handed over to the oil companies. Oil prices have moderated some in recent days, but are still around $95/bbl this afternoon.
I don't expect you to read every one of my posts and memorize my positions, but I've posted dozens of times before that I agree that you and other line mechanics (most of whom are in high-cost-of-living cities) deserve substantially more money than you're currently making. Thing is, no airline in the USA is paying its heavy overhaul mechanics the wages paid to UPS, FedEx or WN AMTs, and I'm certain that Arpey isn't going to make AA the first to do so. So what do you do to fix the problem? Unhitch yourself from your low-cost-of-living union "brothers" who live in Tulsa snd Fort Worth and let them sink or swim on their own merits and then put the screws to the company. Replace the worthless union and your current negotiators with professionals and set them about negotiating your new contract.
About the terms of the leases agreements: Given how miserly (even niggardly) AA has been with its three major workgroups, I have to assume that it is just as frugal when it comes to paying for its new fuel efficient assets. I don't have to read the leases to safely assume that AA is getting the best terms it can, which are probably as good a deal as any airline is getting. I assume that your will, as aways, disagree, as will a certain DL cheerleader (he'll be along shortly to tell me that he knows how much AA pays on its leases and that AA is getting the worst terms of any airline and will soon file for Ch 11 because it can't compete with DL).