southwind
Veteran
Wrong again.
Answer: A legally binding contract that cannot be altered without both parties' approval (short of going back into BK).
Yeah................it's always the fine print that gets you ! :unsure:
Wrong again.
Answer: A legally binding contract that cannot be altered without both parties' approval (short of going back into BK).
Nice...What fine print?
You mean like this?
This guide is not a contract or guarantee of your benefits….â€
All of the Lincoln comparisons really need to stop.
Cut-and-run Obama is no (Republican) Abe Lincoln.
He's just your typical Copperhead like the democrats of 1864.
Although the country's sacrifice was much greater in 1864 when 625,000 Americans lost their lives than in Iraq where we've lost 4,227 Americans, the democratic party and their leader Barack Obama remain the same.
Today's democrats are much like the copperheads of 1864 who quit then, too.
1864 Presidential Campaign
Republican Abraham Lincoln vs Democrat General George McClellan
By 1864, the Country had grown weary of the long and bloody Civil War. Hundreds of thousands of the countries' best and bravest young men had fallen on the fields of Bull Run, Antietam, Shiloh, and countless more. Many began to think that the war was not worth it, and the price of freedom too great. The Republican Presidential Candidate Abraham Lincoln thought no price was too great for the abolition of slavery and the creation of a society in which a man was not judged by the color of his skin. Unfortunately, after four long years of war, Lincoln's support was dropping fast, and people were looking for a way out of the war. Sounds familiar doesn't it?
With this backdrop, the Democratic Party chose General George McClellan to be their Presidential Candidate at the Chicago National Convention in 1864. The Democratic Party Platform presented a plan of "Compromise with the South", which became known as "The Chicago Platform". While on its surface the Chicago Platform was seductive in that it promised an immediate cessation of hostilities, and a restoration of the union. What was unsaid in the platform, but clearly implied, was that the "compromise" would be to agree to make permanent the institution of slavery in exchange for an end to the Civil War and restoration of the Union. In other words, the Democratic party was ready to "Sell Out" the enslaved, in order to stop further loss of white lives.
So either you are lazy or just dishonest.
Eliminate the insane war on drugs and free up BILLIONS by closing prisons, reducing law enforcement and all of the costs involved in controlling the lives of consenting adults. We tax cigarettes and booze so why not Pot, Cocaine, Heroin? Remember there are more drunk driving deaths in one years then all of the drug overdoses since records have been kept. Sins Taxes make money. Insane wars on drugs cost money with little if any measurable results. Treat them all for what they are, public health issues.
I don't hate anyone actually. I choose to believe things when I see it, not just content with words and promises. Especially from politicians (who have no experience). The overwhelming gushing over a elected official is creepy. This isn't American idol. You may have blind faith in elected officials but not for me.
I agree that "gushing" over an elected official gets pretty scary. As someone who typically votes democrat, I didn't quite get the adoration with Obama.I don't hate anyone actually. I choose to believe things when I see it, not just content with words and promises. Especially from politicians (who have no experience). The overwhelming gushing over a elected official is creepy. This isn't American idol. You may have blind faith in elected officials but not for me.
Thanks, It's always nice to be in the good company with my viewpoints.
Harvard is pretty good company and it's sad that the ploitical class can't see the forest for the trees