Look out AA, the unions are mad!

Can you please post the link to this entire story? This info is needed ASAP. Thanks.

Also

http://www.form4oracle.com/company?cik=0000006201&ticker=amr

23-Jan-06 4:41 PM GARTON DANIEL P
Executive Vice President
69,930 Option Sale 20-Jan-06 $19.84
$1,387,257.29

23-Jan-06 4:41 PM GARTON DANIEL P
Executive Vice President
36,330 Option Exercise 20-Jan-06 $13.16
$478,250.94

23-Jan-06 4:41 PM GARTON DANIEL P
Executive Vice President
33,600 Option Exercise 19-Jan-06 $10.68
$358,848.01

PULL TOGETHER WIN TOGETHER B)
 
:up: But we filed an un-grievable grievance. :up:


How about 58,000 granted shares to Arpey? July 2005

http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/620...345X02/doc4.xml

How does that much up to your 468 shares?

No wonder our friend Gerard did not play the other game! Oh but wait!

Look at the sub-notes to this information...

Explanation of Responses:
1. Deferred shares granted under the LTIP. These shares will vest in ten years, depending upon certain performance measurements.

2. Deferred Units that will vest three years after the date of grant provided the recipient remains employed by AMR (or a subsidiary thereof) on such vesting date.

3. The price will be determined on the date of vesting/exercise, as appropriate.

4. Performance Units granted under the 2005/2007 Performance Unit Plan. The measurement period ends on 12/31/2007 with vesting dependent upon the total shareholder return (TSR) of AMR?s common stock relative to competitors? TSR and the achievement of certain corporate objectives.

5. Stock option (right to buy), granted pursuant to the Corporation's 1998 Long Term Incentive Plan, as amended, a stockholder approved plan.



Looks like he did play afterall, just has a different get rich quick date.

CAN YOU SAY "SHARED SACRIFICE"?
 
How about 58,000 granted shares to Arpey? July 2005

http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/620...345X02/doc4.xml

How does that much up to your 468 shares?

No wonder our friend Gerard did not play the other game! Oh but wait!

Look at the sub-notes to this information...
Looks like he did play afterall, just has a different get rich quick date.

CAN YOU SAY "SHARED SACRIFICE"?


Wa, wa wa...This is no different than any other companies executive compesation packages, in fact AA's is alot lower.

Go and further your education and become an officer of a company and you too can earn that kind of dough...CAPICE?
 
According to the twu, we are grieving the bonuses based on attachment 47.1.

http://www.twuatd.org/americanairlines/29daip1252006.pdf

Not sure what there is to grieve, below is 47.1 They base their grievance on the Annual Incentive Plan language which has been established and speaks nothing of managment performance bonuses. So basically they want to look like tough guys when they failed to secure language that would of stopped these bonuses until the concessions are gone.

ATTACHMENT 47.1

From: James B. Weel

To: James C. Little

Re: Incentive

Whereas, American Airlines, Inc. ("Americanâ€￾ or "Companyâ€￾) and the Transport Workers Union of America, AFL-CIO ("TWUâ€￾) have agreed to resolve all disputes which exist or could exist between them related to the negotiation, ratification, and final effectiveness of the Restructuring Agreement, dated April 15, 2003("Restructuring Agreement"), and Whereas, American and the TWU (the "Parties") have each agreed that it is in their mutual interest to permit the Restructuring Agreement to become binding and effective. Now therefore, it is this 24th day of April 2003, hereby agreed that the following shall supplement, and, to the extent inconsistent, modify the Restructuring Agreement

A. Duration of the Agreement. Contingent on approval of this Letter of Agreement by the AMR Board of Directors and the TWU and without further ratification, the Restructuring Agreement will be effective beginning April 15, 2003, and shall remain in effect for a period of five (5) years and become amendable April 30, 2008.

B. Early Reopener. Either the American or the TWU may elect to reopen the Restructuring Agreement by the service of notices pursuant to 45 USC Sec. 156, on or after April 30, 2006.

C. Special Procedure for Change.

1. For a period not to exceed thirty (30) days beginning on written notice by the TWU no later than May 15, 2003, the Parties will meet and discuss the deletion or modification of a single item in the Restructuring Agreements, (the "Original Provision"), such as, the change to Article 34(d) of the Mechanic and related agreement regarding payment of Sick Leave for the first 16 hours at 50% and the substitution of one or more alternative items (the "Offset Modification(s)") such that the net economic result of the deletion or modification and substitution provides cost savings to the Company equal to the cost savings originally projected by the Company for the Original Provision (i.e. $7.0 million per year).

2.If the parties cannot reach agreement during the thirty (30) day period on the Offset Modification(s) having the appropriate aggregate value described in, above, they will select a neutral arbitrator in accordance with the System Board procedure in the Restructuring Agreement. Said arbitrator must be available to hear the matter with seven (7) days of selection and shall issue a decision within 21 days of selection.

3. The arbitrator shall conduct a hearing of no more than one day in duration. American and the TWU will each have a maximum of one-half day for its presentation, with appropriate procedural rules to be set by the arbitrator.

4. At the hearing, the TWU will identify one or more Offset Modification(s), the aggregate value of which must achieve the result described in C.1., above. For example, if the proposed modification to the Original Provision has a cost of $7 million and the arbitrator values the Offset Modification(s) at $6 million, the Union must identify some additional Offset Modification(s) with a value of $1 million.

5. The Parties’ original valuation of the Restructuring Agreement will determine the value of the Original Provision. The arbitrator will determine the value of the all changes to less than all of the Original Provision, as well as the value of all Offset Modification(s). If the arbitrator determines that the value of the Offset Modification(s) is less in aggregate value to the Company than the cost of the modifications or deletions to the Original Provision, unless the TWU selects some additional Offset Modification(s) which achieves the result described in C.1., above, the arbitrator will further modify the Original Provision so that the changes to the Original Provision compared to the aggregate value of the Offset Modifications(s) achieves the result described in C.1., above.

6. The decision of the arbitrator will be final and binding on the TWU and the Company.

D. Annual Incentive Program.

The Company will establish an Annual Incentive Program ("Programâ€￾), as set forth in Attachment A, that shall substitute for and replace the Variable Wage Adjustment Program included in the Restructuring Agreement.

E. Authority and Effective Date. Execution of this Letter of Agreement shall constitute a representation by each party that the terms of this Letter of Agreement and of the Restructuring Agreement have been approved. This Letter of Agreement will become final upon execution on this 24th day of April 2003.

(signed original on file)
 
Wa, wa wa...This is no different than any other companies executive compesation packages, in fact AA's is alot lower.

Go and further your education and become an officer of a company and you too can earn that kind of dough...CAPICE?

Hmm. I guess you should further YOUR education before you speak of things you know nothing about.

Here's an FYI: A Lot is two words. If you don't say alittle why would you say alot?

What is capice? In italian capice is pronounced cup-ee-chay. The word is capisce.

Now, onto the meat of the matter. Nobody begrudges management at any corporation high salaries IF THE COMPANY IS DOING WELL.

If the company is in the toilet than they have no business taking outrageous compensation OF ANY KIND.
 
How so? Their pay was cut just like everyone else's. They get paid more so maybe it didn't "hurt" as much, but they did cut pay. And sill doesn't answer the question as to why a person selling their holdings is a bad thing. Have you made choices on your 401k??? Same idea...


WRONG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

They did NOT take the same paycuts we did. The formula management used for themselves and non-management, non-union employees was not a straight percentage cut.
It was something like:

the first $30000 = a percentage
$30000-$60000 = a percentage
$60000-$90000 = a percentage
etc,etc,etc.

The bottom line was the my supervisor who was making $70,000 a year lost 8.5% or about $6000. He did not lose vacation, sick time. They never had overtime, but they did not lose their COMP time.

THEY DID NOT SHARE IN THE SACRIFICE!!!!!!!!
 
Hmm. I guess you should further YOUR education before you speak of things you know nothing about.

Here's an FYI: A Lot is two words. If you don't say alittle why would you say alot?

What is capice? In italian capice is pronounced cup-ee-chay. The word is capisce.

Now, onto the meat of the matter. Nobody begrudges management at any corporation high salaries IF THE COMPANY IS DOING WELL.

If the company is in the toilet than they have no business taking outrageous compensation OF ANY KIND.

The company has done well given today's economic situation they did not go into Bankruptcy. Wall Street obviously thinks they are doing well too :)
 
the first $30000 = a percentage
$30000-$60000 = a percentage
$60000-$90000 = a percentage

I'm sure that the TWU could have used a sliding scale to protect those at the bottom of the payscale as well, but that would have meant bigger cuts for those at the top of the scale.

You also conveniently overlook that 97% of the management employees had a lot less to take away. Analysts, specialists, engineers, and supervisors (82% of all management employees) and managers (15%) simply didn't see the same size pay increases during the 1980's and 1990's as other workgroups did. Same thing with the agents.

You can say whatever you want about directors and executives (which make up 3% of all management employees), and I'll even agree that they should have taken bigger cuts, but statistically, they're the minority.

They never had overtime, but they did not lose their COMP time.

So, you're saying a manager or supervisor who has to work a sixth or seventh day in a week to cover an operational issue (i.e. covering for another supervisor who is out sick) shouldn't be compensated?

Go read 29 CFR 778.114 - Fixed salary for fluctuating hours. Management employees may be exempt from time and a half according to the DOL, but they're not exempt from the intent of that subsection. If operational overtime can't be balanced out thru comp time off, it has to be paid out.

The key word there is operational -- it doesn't cover time spent on administrative overtime, i.e. working on a bid, performance evaluations, attending a United Way fundraising dinner, etc.
 
Meanwhile Garton and others walk off with millions this past week.

INSIDER & RULE 144 TRANSACTIONS REPORTED - LAST TWO YEARS
Date Insider Shares Type Transaction Value*
20-Jan-06 GARTON, DANIEL P.
Executive Vice President 36,330 Direct Option Exercise at $8.877 - $16.1789 per share. N/A
20-Jan-06 GARTON, DANIEL P.
Executive Vice President 69,930 Direct Sale at $19.8378 per share. $1,387,257

19-Jan-06 BEER, JAMES A
Chief Financial Officer 18,192 Direct Option Exercise at $13.02 - $16.785 per share. N/A
19-Jan-06 BEER, JAMES A
Chief Financial Officer 18,192 Direct Sale at $20.2611 - $20.3 per share. $369,0002
19-Jan-06 GARTON, DANIEL P.
Executive Vice President 33,600 Direct Option Exercise at $10.68 per share. $358,848
19-Jan-06 KENNEDY, GARY
General Counsel 41,466 Direct Option Exercise at $8.877 - $17.1283 per share. N/A
19-Jan-06 KENNEDY, GARY
General Counsel 41,466 Direct Sale at $20.02 - $20.118 per share. $832,0002


These payout are actually part of a bonus plan from 1998. These planes expired last week and they had to exercise their options.

This has nothing to do with the April 2006 payouts.

No, I am not pro-compAAny!
 
I'm sure that the TWU could have used a sliding scale to protect those at the bottom of the payscale as well, but that would have meant bigger cuts for those at the top of the scale.

You also conveniently overlook that 97% of the management employees had a lot less to take away. Analysts, specialists, engineers, and supervisors (82% of all management employees) and managers (15%) simply didn't see the same size pay increases during the 1980's and 1990's as other workgroups did. Same thing with the agents.

You can say whatever you want about directors and executives (which make up 3% of all management employees), and I'll even agree that they should have taken bigger cuts, but statistically, they're the minority.
So, you're saying a manager or supervisor who has to work a sixth or seventh day in a week to cover an operational issue (i.e. covering for another supervisor who is out sick) shouldn't be compensated?

Go read 29 CFR 778.114 - Fixed salary for fluctuating hours. Management employees may be exempt from time and a half according to the DOL, but they're not exempt from the intent of that subsection. If operational overtime can't be balanced out thru comp time off, it has to be paid out.

The key word there is operational -- it doesn't cover time spent on administrative overtime, i.e. working on a bid, performance evaluations, attending a United Way fundraising dinner, etc.


AWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW...poor babies!


I took 17.5% in just pay, Former ModerAAtor Manager!
Loss of One week vacation
Loss of 5 holidays
Loss of holiday pay for remaining 5 days.
First two sick days at 50%
5 sick days accrued a year.


Tell me oh Former ModerAAtor, Manager, Sir!

Do you want to compare what I lost to what your management team lost?
 
These payout are actually part of a bonus plan from 1998. These planes expired last week and they had to exercise their options.

This has nothing to do with the April 2006 payouts.

No, I am not pro-compAAny!


This must mean Garton will get $3 million plus in bonus cash this year. Not to mention the other options and base pay.

Yeah, this sounds fair, and shared sacrifice alright.
 
They did take pay cuts...each work group had their own deals. They also did without any raises or bonuses 2 years prior to when unions were asked for concessions.
Here's the correct breakdown of pay cuts in 2003 for management/non management/non union employees:

First $30,000 = 4%
Second $30,000 = 7%
Third $30,000 = 10%
Over $90,000 = 13.5%
Carty = 33% pay cut plus declined any bonus previous 2 years
Officers = 17%

Using your own example: Your supervisor making $70,000 per year was cut by 11% on the first $60,000 possibly 10% or less on the remaining $10,000. I'm not sure how you came up with 8.5%/$6,000 without the correct percentages.

WRONG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

They did NOT take the same paycuts we did. The formula management used for themselves and non-management, non-union employees was not a straight percentage cut.
It was something like:

the first $30000 = a percentage
$30000-$60000 = a percentage
$60000-$90000 = a percentage
etc,etc,etc.

The bottom line was the my supervisor who was making $70,000 a year lost 8.5% or about $6000. He did not lose vacation, sick time. They never had overtime, but they did not lose their COMP time.

THEY DID NOT SHARE IN THE SACRIFICE!!!!!!!!
 
They did take pay cuts...each work group had their own deals. They also did without any raises or bonuses 2 years prior to when unions were asked for concessions.
Here's the correct breakdown of pay cuts in 2003 for management/non management/non union employees:

First $30,000 = 4%
Second $30,000 = 7%
Third $30,000 = 10%
Over $90,000 = 13.5%
Carty = 33% pay cut plus declined any bonus previous 2 years
Officers = 17%

Using your own example: Your supervisor making $70,000 per year was cut by 11% on the first $60,000 possibly 10% or less on the remaining $10,000. I'm not sure how you came up with 8.5%/$6,000 without the correct percentages.

Actually, you take the first 30,000 and drop 4% of pay, the next 30,000 management lost 7% of pay, the last 10,000 management lost 10% of pay for a grand total of 4,054(6.8%)in pay cut. On top of a 2 year pay freeze a 70,000 in 2001 manager should have been making around 75,712 by 2003. After May 1, 2003, that manager is making 65,946, about a 13% pay cut.


AWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW...poor babies!
I took 17.5% in just pay, Former ModerAAtor Manager!
Loss of One week vacation
Loss of 5 holidays
Loss of holiday pay for remaining 5 days.
First two sick days at 50%
5 sick days accrued a year.
Tell me oh Former ModerAAtor, Manager, Sir!

Do you want to compare what I lost to what your management team lost?

How much of a pay raise did you get from 2001 to 2003 with the new contract that was signed?
 
These payout are actually part of a bonus plan from 1998. These planes expired last week and they had to exercise their options.

This has nothing to do with the April 2006 payouts.

No, I am not pro-compAAny!
Another advantage of the company not going into BK. <_<

So Garton and others get millions from 1998, but we keep hearing the management rhetoric of we never got nothing in the 80's and 90's. Funny thing is that the mechanics never got anything either in the 90's but I don't see my $1.8 million check showing up anytime soon.

I wonder how much he cashed in on the Sabre shares after the split or did the just lower the option price.
 

Latest posts