Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's time to quit pointing fingers and collectively learn from past mistakes. The mistake being... allowing the company, through contract language, the ability to eliminate existing represented work and jobs with outsourcing language. Let's learn from history or we are destined to repeat it! PROTECT THE EXISTING WORK FIRST!And we Care Why??? Its only the Hubs,Class ! cities and anyone else the big boys didnt sell out ! Right Robbed, remember ABE???? Dont Blame PHX or LAS for voting the contract in. That was done years age ago with the Class I cities, PIT got what they deserved, they sold everyone out too!
The reason all members should care is twofold. First of all; buying into language the company inserts into any tentative agreement, that affords them the ability to eliminate the jobs and livelihoods of fellow represented members, should be rejected on principal alone. Secondly; the elimination of jobs in outline stations of senior employees results in involuntary transfers into the larger stations. These displacemnts have an adverse effect on junior employees in the larger stations. In the end; all members are adversly affected without better scope language. Some more than others. WE NEED BETTER SCOPE LANGUAGE. WE NEED TO PROTECT THE EXISTING WORK FIRST before we can achieve future gains. Anything short of that is putting the cart before the horse. This is exactly what the company is hoping the IAM NC and their members do.And we Care Why??? Its only the Hubs,Class ! cities and anyone else the big boys didnt sell out ! Right Robbed, remember ABE???? Dont Blame PHX or LAS for voting the contract in. That was done years age ago with the Class I cities, PIT got what they deserved, they sold everyone out too!