local 12 proud
Veteran
- Joined
- Mar 5, 2004
- Messages
- 4,265
- Reaction score
- 4
the only place AA could have picked more favorable to concessions than Tulsa would be some place like boonesville, Kentucky.
Decision 2004 said:What kind of question is that? Haven't you been told? We are "lucky to have a job, brother".
I work around folks that will gladly give up more to have a job in Tulsa with AA.
It is far more popular to be a company suck-ass than a union man willing to take a stand in Tulsa right now.
Just watch.
[post="241071"][/post]
AMFAMAN said:Once again, Stroke doesn't have the attention span available to fully quote Dell.
[post="241219"][/post]
seed said:Quick question: Do you think the majority will load their toolboxes, in mass, if the company presents us with more concessions?
I'm not talking about the TWU or the AMFA supporters, I'm talking about the general membership at AA, without union instruction. Will they load up to show Arpey it's time to fight?
What excuses will they use? Think hard and answer without using AMFA or TWU in your sentence.
[post="241062"][/post]

<_< Oh you of little imagination! What seed is saying is that the only way to break this downward cycle is to say "No more!" the conncessions stop here! One doesn't have to walk out to get that point across! But frankly, I don't believe the a.a. AMT's have what it takes to do this!! Sad, but true!jimntx said:Doesn't matter which union...it would constitute an illegal job action that is a termination offense. I'm assuming here that you would want your job back after a day or two of "showing" Arpey.
If you are talking about just walking off the job forever and ever amen, then I doubt that more than one or two would walk off, much less a majority. The economic realities of this world controlled by Shrub and company for the benefit of the rich label such action as foolish--unless you have a trust fund and just do this job for funsies.
[post="251797"][/post]
Well I know one fact among all this BS.......The twu International will not have the stones, concessions are gonna save jobs!!!! Whatdaya think Do-little?MCI transplant said:<_< Oh you of little imagination! What seed is saying is that the only way to break this downward cycle is to say "No more!" the conncessions stop here! One doesn't have to walk out to get that point across! But frankly, I don't believe the a.a. AMT's have what it takes to do this!! Sad, but true!
[post="251821"][/post]
MCI transplant said:<_< Oh you of little imagination! What seed is saying is that the only way to break this downward cycle is to say "No more!" the conncessions stop here! One doesn't have to walk out to get that point across! But frankly, I don't believe the a.a. AMT's have what it takes to do this!! Sad, but true!
[post="251821"][/post]
MCI transplant said:<_< Oh you of little imagination! What seed is saying is that the only way to break this downward cycle is to say "No more!" the conncessions stop here! One doesn't have to walk out to get that point across! But frankly, I don't believe the a.a. AMT's have what it takes to do this!! Sad, but true!
[post="251821"][/post]
<_< Bob!----- You can say what you want, but what excuess you going to use when we're gone???Personally I don't think there's ten cents worth of differance between you!!!!Good Luck to all! You'll need it!!!! :down:Bob Owens said:Well the fact is if you took out MCI, the concession vote of 2003 would have failed. Thats right MCI provided the 700 votes that passed the contract.
As I recall the vote from MCI was "Yes" by the widest margin of any station wasnt it?So it looks like MCI is the problem, not TWA AMTs or AA AMTs.
So dont worry about us, just work on your own coworkers there in MCI. By the way the AA AMTs in Local 562 voted NO by well over 90%. I'm confident that even with all the TWA guys that came in we would still get the same results. So its not AA vs TWA anymore, its pig farmers vs the mechanics, just like it was before AA came on the scene.
[post="258025"][/post]
<_<"Fact"?, Oh really! Something to think about Bob! Knowing what you know now about how MR. Little and Co. count votes, do you feel that 700 number could be, let's say "exagerated"? Think about it! What better way to get what you want and blame it on the new kid on the block! In 2003 we had close to 1800 AMTs here at MCI! And he's saying it was turned down by 700 votes! Can I prove any of this? Of course not! All I'm saying is you've seen how they handled the representation vote! All I do know is how I voted! And that was a "Hell No!"------ Something to think about!-----Signed:" Just another one of a.a.'s red headed step children!"Bob Owens said:Well the fact is if you took out MCI, the concession vote of 2003 would have failed. Thats right MCI provided the 700 votes that passed the contract.
As I recall the vote from MCI was "Yes" by the widest margin of any station wasnt it?So it looks like MCI is the problem, not TWA AMTs or AA AMTs.
So dont worry about us, just work on your own coworkers there in MCI. By the way the AA AMTs in Local 562 voted NO by well over 90%. I'm confident that even with all the TWA guys that came in we would still get the same results. So its not AA vs TWA anymore, its pig farmers vs the mechanics, just like it was before AA came on the scene.
[post="258025"][/post]