Obama's War on Women

[Ms Tree]

You seem to think the only principles the GOP has in their platform are to ban abortion and gay marriage.That's what the Alinskyites on MSLSD will have you believe, but on the Top 10 list of things really important to conservatives, those are probably #19 and #24, if not lower.The only reason they get any attention is because they're lightning rods, and it's far easier to attack issues of faith than it is for Liberals to have to answer for the reality of what 6 years under Obama has resulted in, or how unaccountable the DOJ, IRS, NSA, etc. have been with regard to privacy and retaliation against those the Administration disagrees with.At some point, enough people will see thru the facades of socialism, and realize that it ain't working for them anymore. It may not be this year, it may not be until after the country goes further into debt and can't lie their way out of it.But it will happen. And when it does, I'm guessing that the issues of importance then are going to reflect that Top 10 of things that conservatives currently see as most important.

Well you better figure something out. Several polls (here is the Pew one)
http://mobile.nytimes.com/2013/02/11/us/politics/in-montana-young-liberal-and-open-to-big-government.html

show that the youth under 30 believe that government should do more not less. They are more socially liberal and they believe govt has a large roll to play. That's pretty much everything the GOP is not.

I guess 2014/16 will be a indicator but regardless, politics is a pendulum. Swings back and forth because in the final analysis, both parties screw it up to the point where the people want a change to let the other side do it.

 

[delldude]

Well you better figure something out. Several polls (here is the Pew one)
http://mobile.nytimes.com/2013/02/11/us/politics/in-montana-young-liberal-and-open-to-big-government.html

show that the youth under 30 believe that government should do more not less. They are more socially liberal and they believe govt has a large roll to play. That's pretty much everything the GOP is not.

I guess 2014/16 will be a indicator but regardless, politics is a pendulum. Swings back and forth because in the final analysis, both parties screw it up to the point where the people want a change to let the other side do it.

 

 

Harvard Poll Shows Millennials Have 'Historically Low' Levels Of Trust In Government
A new poll surveying young Americans' political attitudes released by Harvard University's Institute of Politics Tuesday found millennials have less trust in government than ever before. 
Harvard's poll showed millennials, which the pollsters defined as peopled aged 18 to 29, have lost trust in a variety of different major public institutions including the President, the military, Congress, the Supreme Court, and the federal government as a whole. Of all the institutions tracked by the poll, the President and the military lost the most trust among young Americans with a seven point drop. Overall, the pollsters said the level of trust millennials have in "most American institutions tested in our survey" had dropped below even "last year’s historically low numbers." 

Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/poll-millenials-have-historically-low-levels-of-trust-in-government-2014-4#ixzz30IZXYLMW

 

 

[eolesen]

Something else in the Harvard study...

http://washingtonexaminer.com/harvard-young-voters-leave-democrats-for-gop-just-1-in-4-plan-to-vote/article/2547824

Young voters identifying as Democrat have fallen from 38% to 35%.

Young voters identifying as Republican have risen from 23% to 25%.

Seems to contradict everything Ad and Tree have been trying to push, but hey, what would Harvard know...

Given the liberal slant associated with Harvard, I also have to assume that there's some bias in their results, which may mean that both the drop for the Democrats and the increase for the Republicans are being understated.

 

[AdAstraPerAspera]

Given the number of Republican presidents who have attended Harvard, that's a pretty thin contention to make.
 
I'd love to be shown an era, anytime in history, where young people have identified as majority conservative.
 
 

LOL . . who are you kidding? You're just another one of the self-absorbed smart power progressives trying to sell your stupidity to those of us that have it all over you. I speak with great authority when I say you don't know jacksh!t.
 
Isn't it time for you to log off and sign back in as Ms Tree now?      

 
Cute how you think that everyone must agree with you, and the number of people who disagree with you is so small they can only amount to one person, but I can assure you nobody I have encountered who is my age is anywhere near conservative, and I know a lot of people from Kansas and Missouri.

 

[Ms Tree]

Something else in the Harvard study...http://washingtonexaminer.com/harvard-young-voters-leave-democrats-for-gop-just-1-in-4-plan-to-vote/article/2547824Young voters identifying as Democrat have fallen from 38% to 35%.Young voters identifying as Republican have risen from 23% to 25%.Seems to contradict everything Ad and Tree have been trying to push, but hey, what would Harvard know...Given the liberal slant associated with Harvard, I also have to assume that there's some bias in their results, which may mean that both the drop for the Democrats and the increase for the Republicans are being understated.

Perhaps the polls looked at differ things or asked the questions differently. Either way, kids are much more liberal in their think than our generation. The GOP is screwed until they get out of the bed room and get back their fiscal conservative roots.

Good luck with that. .

 

[Knotbuyinit]

Given the number of Republican presidents who have attended Harvard, that's a pretty thin contention to make.
 
I'd love to be shown an era, anytime in history, where young people have identified as majority conservative.
 
 
 
Cute how you think that everyone must agree with you, and the number of people who disagree with you is so small they can only amount to one person, but I can assure you nobody I have encountered who is my age is anywhere near conservative, and I know a lot of people from Kansas and Missouri.

Hold everything! Why didn't you tell me from the beginning that you know lots of people from Kansas and Missouri?! I'm so impressed!

 

[AdAstraPerAspera]

^ u jelly bro

 

[Glenn Quagmire]

Hold everything! Why didn't you tell me from the beginning that you know lots of people from Kansas and Missouri?! I'm so impressed!

I can tell he knows peeps from PA too.

 

[delldude]

Florida Democrats Just Voted To Impose Sharia Law On Women


Florida Democrats have declared war on women; but fortunately, their attack on our freedoms was turned back by Republicans who represented America and voted against them.
Anyone who isn’t certain that Democrats are devoted to destroying America need only take a look at their despicable conduct in the Florida Senate. In a vote that never should have had to be taken, every single Democrat voted to force Sharia Law on the people of Florida. By doing so, they placed women and children in very real danger. The vote was 24 votes for America and 14 votes for al Qaeda and the Taliban cast by loathsome Democrats. They voted to deny Americans the Constitutional protections generations of American men and women fought for and died to protect. Democrats have revealed their desire to force Americans to live as slaves to a third world, foreign “justice system.”

Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/florida-democrats-just-voted-impose-sharia-law-women/#cuz1SKGs4z5xKkdT.99

 
 
 

 

 

[eolesen]

http://www.mediaite.com/online/dems-smearing-of-female-goper-yet-another-blow-to-the-war-on-women/

 

[Ms Tree]

So political attacks in an election cycle is equivalent to legislation that affects all women?  Lol.  Let me know how that works for you.

 

[eolesen]

It's just the double standard. Dems complain that there aren't more women elected by the GOP, and yet, the Dems go digging up crap like this to ensure that the GOP can't elect more women.

If the GOP was digging up stuff on female Dem candidates, it would be labeled as misogyny and a war on women.

Here, you label it as just a run of the mill political attack.

 

[Dog Wonder]

If the GOP was digging up stuff on female Dem candidates, it would be labeled as misogyny and a war on women.

 

Would that include Endless Benghazi Babbling?

 

[Ms Tree]

It's just the double standard. Dems complain that there aren't more women elected by the GOP, and yet, the Dems go digging up crap like this to ensure that the GOP can't elect more women.If the GOP was digging up stuff on female Dem candidates, it would be labeled as misogyny and a war on women.Here, you label it as just a run of the mill political attack.

Oh please. When I called ST a misogynist it was because he attacked in tons looks. Not her actions or politics.

What you seem to be arguing is that since Dems favor more women in politics they should not attack Republican candidates who's policies Democrats disagree with solely because she is a woman.

That has got to be the dumbest argument I have heard on this issue. Political attack ads will happen regress of gender. To ask for a pass because someone is female is just plain stupid.

 

[southwind]

Perhaps the polls looked at differ things or asked the questions differently. Either way, kids are much more liberal in their think than our generation. The GOP is screwed until they get out of the bed room and get back their fiscal conservative roots.
Good luck with that. .

Prolly cause they expect something for nothing.
This is no longer the land of opportunity but, the land of "What can I have the government take from others and give to me !