What's new

' Onward CHRISTIAN.....$$$$$$$$$$.....SOLDIERS '

cltrat said:
typical comment from you, use anything to justify your position.
 
allow me to use your method  yes those Indians did learn, not to f with those innocent women and kids.... the hard way
So the white man was fair and honest with the natives. The Natives were totally at fault and had no justification to lash out against the noble and benevolent visitors?
 
eolesen said:
I guess you missed all that stuff that happened thousands of years ago to the tribes of Israel in Exodus, eh?Oh, that's right. You think that the Bible is a fable. The Jews never lived east of Egypt before 1948...
x

Just because the bible is interspersed with pieces of actual history does not make it any more real than a 'law and order' episode that has similarities to real world events.
 
Ms Tree said:
So the white man was fair and honest with the natives. The Natives were totally at fault and had no justification to lash out against the noble and benevolent visitors?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FHjfC780Mm4
 
Ms Tree said:
Just because the bible is interspersed with pieces of actual history does not make it any more real than a 'law and order' episode that has similarities to real world events.
So pieces of actual history are not real. 
 
Got ya.
 
Another display of libtard logic brought to you by Ms Tree.
 
La Li Lu Le Lo said:
Why don't you tell the government your philosophy. Please invite me over though so I can watch when they sell the property out from under your dumb ass. Be sure to refer them to that webpage.
Your reading comprehension sucks. Never said tbat. I said it was their (native American) belief (not mine) and that you are ignorant.
 
La Li Lu Le Lo said:
So pieces of actual history are not real. 
 
Got ya.
 
Another display of libtard logic brought to you by Ms Tree.
Never said that either. History is real the bible is made up. You talking about logic is like Manson talking about morality.
 
Ms Tree said:
So the white man was fair and honest with the natives. The Natives were totally at fault and had no justification to lash out against the noble and benevolent visitors?
Presumably you're a Darwinist, no? I know atheists like to separate evolution from social Darwinism, but if you believe that only the fittest within a species survive, then how can you simultaneously question what happened in terms of aboriginals being displaced by those with more advanced armies? This has happened thruout history, on every inhabited continent, and in every age and era.

Christianity doesn't promote the idea of conquering other nations or people. That idea existed long before the last 2000 years.
 
eolesen said:
Presumably you're a Darwinist, no? I know atheists like to separate evolution from social Darwinism, but if you believe that only the fittest within a species survive, then how can you simultaneously question what happened in terms of aboriginals being displaced by those with more advanced armies? This has happened thruout history, on every inhabited continent, and in every age and era.

Christianity doesn't promote the idea of conquering other nations or people. That idea existed long before the last 2000 years.
 
And it say's ...." WHAT " ........about..." OWNING " any part of Mother Earth  ?????????
 
Same problem. Never said any of the nor did I address the issue of social darwinism. Lala was talking about the native being violent toward the settlers. All I was pointing out is that there may have been a contributing factor involved.

The settler invaded and concurred the locals. History books make it out like we came in peace and the natives had no reason to be pissed. They fought a war and lost. No reason to dress it up as something it is not. The settlers were not benevolent. We broke virtually every treaty signed with the natives.

The Christians may not have invented it but they sure as hell did support it and promote it. Manifest destiny. If that is not promotion of the idea I have no clue what is.
 
He did say "given the tough choice" and since if I recall correctly Bear does have native American ancestry and given what Amhurst did to the natives of this country I think I can understand the comment he made in the context of this discussion.  And if I were a betting man I am guessing you do also.
GREAT SPIN!!! Amazing how even pure stupidity is defended.
 
Perhaps had they built a wall and had better boarder security all those damn immigrants would not have come in their country.  OH well, live and learn
You left out one, eenie, tiny word...ILLEGAL(immigrants)!
 
x

Just because the bible is interspersed with pieces of actual history does not make it any more real than a 'law and order' episode that has similarities to real world events.
To those who know, your ignorance shines when you share your knowledge about the Bible. Most of us know that it is foolishness to you, and you are a fool to us.

PS I don't buy your story!
 

Latest posts

Back
Top