Outsourcing Could Hurt Airbase

Checking it Out

Veteran
Apr 3, 2003
1,702
0
Posted on Tue, Apr. 27, 2004





Outsourcing could hurt airbase

DULUTH:Northwest Airlines' desire to outsource more mechanical work raises concerns about additional job losses at its Duluth maintenance base.

BY PETER PASSI

NEWS TRIBUNE STAFF WRITER


As part of a cost-cutting initiative, Northwest Airlines is looking to outsource more of its airplane maintenance work.


The company has asked the Aircraft Mechanics Fraternal Association, the union that represents its maintenance workers, for contract alterations enabling it to lift the cap on how much work it can send to external companies. The union estimates that if Northwest has its way and is able to boost the amount of work it outsources from 38 percent to 48 percent, another 1,000 workers would lose their jobs.

Those cuts would come on top of others that have enabled Northwest to trim about 2,700 mechanics from its payroll during the past three years.

"Obviously, we don't like the idea," said Randy Reents, a Northwest mechanic at Northwest's Duluth airbase and vice president of AMFA Local 35. "As far as us willingly making concessions that give more jobs away, it's not going to happen."

Employment at Northwest's Duluth maintenance base has declined about 40 percent, from more than 350 people at the start of 2003 to 217 employees as of the airline's last report Nov. 30.

"People in Duluth should be teed off about outsourcing at Northwest," Reents said, pointing to the company's pledge to create and maintain 350 jobs at its Duluth airbase. "We've already lost a lot of jobs."

AMFA's contract with Northwest could be open for amendment in May 2005, and negotiations are expected to begin this fall.

Northwest wants to remain profitable this year. During 2003, it eked out $248 million of net income on sales of $9.5 billion.

It will need to make up some ground, however. During the first quarter of this year, it posted a $230 million loss.

Duluth Mayor Herb Bergson said that during a meeting with Gov. Tim Pawlenty earlier this month, the two discussed Northwest's failure to maintain promised employment levels at the maintenance base.

In return for $270 million in bond financing from the Metropolitan Airports Commission, plus additional assistance from Duluth, St. Louis County and the Iron Range Resources and Rehabilitation Board, the airline pledged to hire at least 350 people to work at its Duluth airbase by the end of 2000 and to maintain the work force at that minimum level for the next 30 years.

Pawlenty "reiterated that while the state was monitoring the situation, it was not going to take action until May of 2005 in terms of holding Northwest's feet to the fire regarding the numbers," Bergson said of his conversation with the governor. "Naturally, we're disappointed."

Bergson said he has no intention to let Northwest off the hook.

"Northwest received lots of money -- both the state's and ours," he said, noting the aid the airline received through agreements in 1992 and 1994. "They made a promise, and we want to hold them to it."

Peter Sausen, an assistant commissioner for the Minnesota Department of Finance, said he believes the state could technically recall Northwest's financing in light of cuts it made in Duluth, but doing so might jeopardize the airline's continued health.

However, Mary Stanik, a Northwest spokeswoman, contends her company has acted within its rights.

"Northwest Airlines is in full compliance with the financing agreement which provides relief from meeting target employment levels during times of national economic stress," she said. "Reductions in Minnesota employment levels cannot exceed national company employment reductions."

For now, Sausen said the state doesn't intend to play hardball.

"We're not enforcing the remedies that are available to us at this time, but we are watching the situation," he said.

But when economic conditions improve and Northwest finds itself on firmer footing, the airline will be expected to make good on its word.

"They have an agreement with the state, Duluth and St. Louis County to maintain a certain number of jobs, and we intend to get those jobs back," Sausen said.

In a Feb. 27 letter to Northwest, the Minnesota Department of Finance asked the airline to begin providing monthly employment level reports at the Duluth maintenance base and any pending changes in operations. Sausen said his office has received no response from the company.

Robert Benner, Northwest's director of government affairs, could not be reached for comment Tuesday, but acknowledged in a March 10 letter to Bergson that Northwest has fallen below target employment levels in Duluth. Yet he held out little hope that jobs would be returned any time soon.

"While employment is expected to be flat in 2004, we plan to restore employment levels in Duluth when we recall substantial numbers of mechanics as economic conditions improve," he wrote.

Benner said there may be opportunities to transfer additional work to Duluth.

"We recognize our obligation to restore employment to a level consistent with the policy covenants," Benner said.

St. Paul Pioneer Press staff writer Martin J. Moylan contributed to this report.
 
CIO,

Where does it say AMFA is allowing anything in this article? AA has yet to meet it's commitment to the city of FT.WORTH regarding employment levels at AFW. CIO, why did the TWU allow AA to move the 757 lines to TULSA? Why did the EVIL TWU allow AFW's APU shop to be 100% OUTSOURCED? Why is the TWU gonna allow TAESL to be broken off as a totally separate company from AA?

AMFA has fought :up: the worst management team(Northwest's) in the airline industry, while the TWU SURRENDERED to the runnerup(AA) :down:
 
PRINCESS KIDAGAKASH said:
CIO,

Where does it say AMFA is allowing anything in this article? AA has yet to meet it's commitment to the city of FT.WORTH regarding employment levels at AFW. CIO, why did the TWU allow AA to move the 757 lines to TULSA? Why did the EVIL TWU allow AFW's APU shop to be 100% OUTSOURCED? Why is the TWU gonna allow TAESL to be broken off as a totally separate company from AA?

AMFA has fought :up: the worst management team(Northwest's) in the airline industry, while the TWU SURRENDERED to the runnerup(AA) :down:
You accuse NWA of having bad management? They are one of the majors that are closer to breaking even. They effectively cut their maintenance cost.

The question is did AMFA help or hinder that effort?
 
j7915 said:
You accuse NWA of having bad management? They are one of the majors that are closer to breaking even. They effectively cut their maintenance cost.

The question is did AMFA help or hinder that effort?
As you can see 2808 mechanic and related lost their jobs in the last 3 years is now down to 2700, the difference is they went out under the force-majure clause and I believe most will get their jobs back. AMFA lost the first force-majure case (some where around 800 employees) due to 9/11 as being an industry wide force-majurable event. The second and third cases are yet to be decided but, look very promising. The second and third force-majure cases could end up with all or part of these employees being made whole, which would mean full back pay plus any costs related to being forced out. When this happens NW will have to bring back a substantial amount of work in-house.

As to your question did AMFA help or hinder NWA into profitability. Not even sure what you are asking by this but, I do think the mechanic and related craft and class at NWA is not near as disgruntled as the industrial unionized contracts stuffed down the throats of the mechanics craft and classes of other airlines including AA United and USair.

When the IAM negotiated contract an United that allowed the maintenance bases to be closed plus the wage concessions (although not near as bad as the twu's wage and benefit concessions) of the bankruptcy judge, it had to of taken the heart out of the mechanics Craft and Class there.

The twu negotiated contract here at AA that devastated wages, benefits and gutted work rules has caused the work force here to be very disgruntled.

In my opinion the NWA mechanics have the most to look forward to and have the best contract in the land (SWA wages and benefits are comparable but, NWA has the best scope language) . Therefore they are the most productive and because of that, AMFA has contributed to the profitability of the airline.
 
Those cuts would come on top of others that have enabled Northwest to trim about 2,700 mechanics from its payroll during the past three years.


So according to this reporter its 2700, not all those inflated numbers that the TWU has been posting.



However according to the latest seniority list we only have around 14000 in our class and craft, but the TWU claims that including those laid off, we have nearly 21000 in our class and craft. So that means that we lost over 7000 M&R jobs! So the TWU is tops in concessions and lost jobs.


Is the TWU really a union? $3.1 million sure goes a long way with the TWU.

What was your reason for posting this CIO? If anything it hurts your arguement. Are you switching sides already?
 
j7915 said:
You accuse NWA of having bad management? They are one of the majors that are closer to breaking even. They effectively cut their maintenance cost.

The question is did AMFA help or hinder that effort?
And so did AA, by slashing everyones pay and benifits while laying off thousands of workers.

AMFA kept the wage up, so that when those workers come back, as the story implied, they come back to a good job. AMFA protected their members. The TWU sold us all out.

I have a question for you. Would you say that in the past unions were more or less powerful?

If you say less please explain.

If you say more,then answer this. "How did unions deal with economic downturns in the past?"

Did they agree to permanent, six year concessionary contracts or did they fight the company and if neccissary allow layoffs to maintain the gains they made?

No matter how you try to rationalize what the TWU did the fact remains that the company got everything they wanted and all the workers have been permanently set back. Basically the company achieved all their objectives, as if there was no union in place at all.

Are you aware of the fact that most labor strife, strikes, job actions etc occur during poor economic conditions, not as the TWU seems to maintain when everything is rosy?

The fact is that this union took the companys threats and surrendered without a fight. My suspicion as to why they did this is because they knew that the company would be well within their rights to cut off the $3.1 million that they slip to union officials. Payments that are not reported to the DOL or the members. Lets face it, if they did cut them off, what could the TWU say about it? They should not have been getting it in the first place.

Whether or not the company would have been able to lay off twelve thousand mechanics, abrogate the contract and all those other threats is debatable. It is without debate or doubt that the company could have cut off the $3.1 million that they pay TWU officials. That was the clincher for them, that is why they surrendered and then went on to exaggerate the companys threat by claiming that if we rejected the agreement that the company might liquidate. They were not trying to save us, they were, and are, lying and scheming to save their own illicit payola.

As a union man why are you still supporting an organization that you admit is structured more like a corporation instead of a democratic accountable organiztion that advocates for workers?
 

Latest posts

Back
Top