What's new

PBS Colorado 911 Explosive Evidence

traderjake said:
“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.”
 
as4.gif
Joseph Goebbels quotes
 
Sounds like you average 911 CT.  One big lie so charlatans can make money off fools.
 
777 fixer said:
Anyone who believes this non-sense has to believe one of two things.  Either GWB help orchestrate it or he was totally incompetant not to notice something was afoot.
 
Infowars-News for idiots
Right! Just like BaRack either knew about and is lying or is a completely incompetent hack, about the following topics.................you tell me!
 
1. Benghazi
2. Fast and Furious
3. IRS scandal 
4. AP Scandal
5. Rosegate
6. GSA Gone Wild
7. Veterans Affairs in Disney World
8. Sebelius violates the Hatch Act
9. Solyndra
 
Need I go on........................
 
http://www.whitehousedossier.com/2013/08/01/obama-dozen-scandals-counting/
 
southwind said:
Right! Just like BaRack either knew about and is lying or is a completely incompetent hack, about the following topics.................you tell me!
 
1. Benghazi
2. Fast and Furious
3. IRS scandal 
4. AP Scandal
5. Rosegate
6. GSA Gone Wild
7. Veterans Affairs in Disney World
8. Sebelius violates the Hatch Act
9. Solyndra
 
Need I go on........................
 
http://www.whitehousedossier.com/2013/08/01/obama-dozen-scandals-counting/
Please get help.
 
777 fixer said:
Please get help.
I see! It's ok to suggest that 1. Either Bush was incompetent, in allowing 9/11 to happen or 2. He Knew about it but, to put the "Anointed One" in that category is blasphemy !
 
You, my friend, seem to be the one who needs help in breaking your addiction to the BaRack Koolaid!
 
Glenn Quagmire said:
This was not a PBS production.


 
 
What bothers me is that with all things going on in the world they would set aside time for this non-sense.
 
southwind said:
I see! It's ok to suggest that 1. Either Bush was incompetent, in allowing 9/11 to happen or 2. He Knew about it but, to put the "Anointed One" in that category is blasphemy !
 
You, my friend, seem to be the one who needs help in breaking your addiction to the BaRack Koolaid!
Are you capable of logical thinking?  If you were you would have understood the point I was trying to make.  But instead you jumped to yet another rash conclusion.
 
What I was trying to say that if one believes in 9-11 CT you have to also believe that GWB either help plan it, knew of it and did nothing or was totally inept.  And you would have to say the same thing about Al Gore if he had won the election.  In other words it would not matter who was president I would have said the same thing.  
 
And no I do not believe that if someone else had been president the attacks would not have happened.
 
777 fixer said:
 
What bothers me is that with all things going on in the world they would set aside time for this non-sense.
 
You bother to watch the nonsense?
 
Glenn Quagmire said:
You implied it was a PBS production with the thread title and in your initial post:

"2012 Documentary by Colorado PBS station 12"

And no, I don't think they are a bunch of wackos at the station. I think it is fine to air that show. However, as the PBS Ombudsman said, they should have made it clear it was not a PBS production and allowed for a debate afterwords.
 
How foolish of me Quags.....Does that make the evidence they provided go away?
 
With all your rhetoric on the documentary.......did you bother to watch it?
 
Glenn Quagmire said:
If I watch it more than once, does it then make it true?
I watched Pirates of the Caribbean 20 times and damned if I did not see a mermaid the next time went to the beach. So yes little Glenn. It can happen.
 
delldude said:
Good points, Jake.
 
Quag's will take the opinion of 2100 IPCC government subsidized scientists as gospel.
 
2100 Architects forensically dispute NIST investigation claims and they are wackos.
 
And in his sourcing, I didn't see anyone dispute the Assoc of Architects claims.
 
Did you bother to bother to apply any logic or deductive reasoning reason to the claims?  Because if you did you probably would have noticed some serious flaws in this paranoid little fantasy.
 
777 fixer said:
 
Did you bother to bother to apply any logic or deductive reasoning reason to the claims?  Because if you did you probably would have noticed some serious flaws in this paranoid little fantasy.
 
Some of the most serious flaws I noticed were NIST stating they hadn't found any explosive residue.
 
The Architect group says they in fact found explosive residue.
 
777 fixer said:
 
Did you bother to bother to apply any logic or deductive reasoning reason to the claims?  Because if you did you probably would have noticed some serious flaws in this paranoid little fantasy.
 
Buildings don't collapse through their center of mass at free fall speed unless the structure below offers no resistance.
 
That's a law of physics that no amount of your polictical bia can negate.
 
Yep a multi-ton 767 loaded with fuel for a transcon flight didnt have enough fuel to fan the fire that melted the exoskeleton that also helped support the building, NOT!
 
Geez, some of you really need to get a hobby.
 
My neighbor as a kid was an iron worker and built the WTC, my stepbrother is a paramedic in NYC a good friend is a special undercover NYPD and they were there and saw what happened, I have video from the NYPD that shows a lot of things.
 
There was no conspiracy an no explosives around the hidden skeleton of the building.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top