- Jul 23, 2003
- 15,988
- 9,428
On a three year basis, HA, CAL, ALK, RJET, SKYW, LUV all performed better than AMR (HA doing the best of all stocks, with LUV just barely outperforming).
JBLU, AAI, LCC, XJT, and MESA (in declining order) all performed worse than AMR.
DAL, FRNT, MEH, NWA and UAUA can't be compared, because their stock in effect on 1/1/06 had been subsequently been cancelled by bankruptcy, or in the case of MEH, the company was taken private.
From the 2007 DEF-14:
#1 CAL
#2 ALK
#3 LUV
#4 AMR
#5 JBLU
#6 AAI
#7 LCC
Being smack dab in the middle at #4, it would appear the Privileged 1000 (just a guess at how many are covered by the plan...) get their payouts come April...
For the record, I vehemently oppose the payouts on moral and ethical grounds. It's contractual compensation, and therefore a slippery slope for employees to demand that the payouts be cancelled.
That said, and I'm not holding my breath on this, but it would be a huge display of leadership by example should senior management and Board of Directors decide not pay them out. It won't undo four years of ill will, but you have to start somewhere....
JBLU, AAI, LCC, XJT, and MESA (in declining order) all performed worse than AMR.
DAL, FRNT, MEH, NWA and UAUA can't be compared, because their stock in effect on 1/1/06 had been subsequently been cancelled by bankruptcy, or in the case of MEH, the company was taken private.
From the 2007 DEF-14:
The designated competitors for the total shareholder return component are AirTran Airways, Alaska Airlines, Continental Airlines, JetBlue Airways, Southwest Airlines and US Airways. We did not include Delta Air Lines, Northwest Airlines or United Airlines as competing airlines since their stock was not listed on a national stock exchange at the inception of the 2006/2008 Performance Share Plan due to their then-pending bankruptcy proceedings.
#1 CAL
#2 ALK
#3 LUV
#4 AMR
#5 JBLU
#6 AAI
#7 LCC
Being smack dab in the middle at #4, it would appear the Privileged 1000 (just a guess at how many are covered by the plan...) get their payouts come April...
For the record, I vehemently oppose the payouts on moral and ethical grounds. It's contractual compensation, and therefore a slippery slope for employees to demand that the payouts be cancelled.
That said, and I'm not holding my breath on this, but it would be a huge display of leadership by example should senior management and Board of Directors decide not pay them out. It won't undo four years of ill will, but you have to start somewhere....