What's new

Significant Layoffs

[blockquote]
----------------
On 1/1/2003 8:26:19 PM UnitedChicago wrote:

Disagree.

U is too shakey right now. Half full here...so I'm hopeful they make it...but risky to hang ua's hat on U handling IAD.

Again...there are many other assets to consider first.
----------------
[/blockquote]
U and United are are still dancing,just a matter of time
code sharing is just the first step in the process..
 
[blockquote]
----------------
On 1/1/2003 2:13:08 PM UnitedChicago wrote:

G4G5:

"While I admit that things are bad at AA they aren't nearly as bad as UAL's difficulties."

Duh. I never said they were as bad...I said that AA is not in great shape. People don't realize that because all of the attention is on UA.

When UA emerges with a cost structure far below AA's...what are AA's options? Do you truly think that they can match UA's cost dollar for dollar without CH11? I don't think so. There's no incentive for the unions to match dollar for dollar.

AA will either be a higher cost carrier - UA will kick their ass - or they will go CH11 to match dollar for dollar.

Have a nice day.

----------------
[/blockquote]


The attention is on UAL for obvious reasons, that was my point AA is not in the same shape.

"There's no incentive for the unions to match dollar for dollar."

Maybe you should spread some of that glass half full cheer with the IAM. There you go again concerning yourself with AA's unions when you can't even get your own unions to agree. What you need to do is look at a little history, Eastern's in particular.

The IAM is pissed and they are not going to play nice in the sand box. First thing you need to understand is that an A&P's trade is the most transferable in the industry. Any airline mechanic can look in the classifieds and find a job of equal or better pay. The last time I looked their weren't many,"wanted current and quallified 747 pilots/Intl FA's". A lot of these guys are feed up with their ESOP loss and are not going to give back a dime. I spent 5 years as an A&P and their comes a time when you say, "screw it". Why should I work outside, on the night shift, weekends, holidays, yada yada for this, when I can make the same money repairing elevators for Otis working inside, days, no weekends, holidays off, better bennies, retirement, yada yada.

Or the, "someone is going to fly to Asia, these gates won't go vacant". "What's it to me, just a different paint job and a new name on the check, give me a couple years and I'll be making the same pay for some one who gives a S$%&." I've seen both types.

This is what most folks who have never turned a wrench don't understand. They have a tendancy to say,"those guys have a lot to lose, they just don't get it, or they will get on board" That's easy to say when you don't have to change a brake on the ramp at ORD in middle of January at night. When mgt comes and say we want you to do this for 13% less, oh by the way we also want......... You stop and ask yourself, "is this what I signed up for"? So please don't talk to me about AA's unions or how UAL will kick AA's butt without going Ch11. At least not until the IAM decides it wants to see UAL live another week.

Happy New Year.
 
[blockquote]
----------------
On 1/1/2003 10:22:54 PM Busdrvr wrote:

"The last time I looked their weren't many,"wanted current and quallified 747 pilots/Intl FA's"

G4G5,

http://www.wasinc.net/employment.asp

He's already hired a few UAL and U pilots
----------------
[/blockquote]


Thanks for the tip.

I saw 3 help wanted add.'s for pilots of which one was for an A300/310 job. What about the other 9000? You know what I ment.
 
G4G5, good post on a mechanic's point of view. You got it right.

Now for all the others to post something to the effect that the mechanics cannot be allowed to have that attitude.
 
Hit the submit button too early!

More thoughts...

I just don't understand those who are bent on ruining the chances for UA to emerge just because they're sick of the BS.

If you're sick of the BS, get a new job with OTIS or another firm and at least give the other employees the opportunity to save their airline.
 
G4G5 Wrote:

"Maybe you should spread some of that glass half full cheer with the IAM. There you go again concerning yourself with AA's unions when you can't even get your own unions to agree. "

I don't work for United. I am a customer. In terms of me concerning myself with AA's unions...I'm just discussing the competitive impacts to AA that UA's emergence will bring. I'm not on a smear campaign like Bob Lott (Owens).

G4G5 Wrote:

"The IAM is pissed and they are not going to play nice in the sand box. First thing you need to understand is that an A&P's trade is the most transferable in the industry. Any airline mechanic can look in the classifieds and find a job of equal or better pay........

A lot of these guys are feed up with their ESOP loss and are not going to give back a dime. I spent 5 years as an A&P and their comes a time when you say, "screw it". Why should I work outside, on the night shift, weekends, holidays, yada yada for this, when I can make the same money repairing elevators for Otis working inside, days, no weekends, holidays off, better bennies, retirement, yada yada......

This is what most folks who have never turned a wrench don't understand. They have a tendancy to say,"those guys have a lot to lose, they just don't get it, or they will get on board" That's easy to say when you don't have to change a brake on the ramp at ORD in middle of January at night. When mgt comes and say we want you to do this for 13% less, oh by the way we also want......... You stop and ask yourself, "is this what I signed up for"?......"

FIRST off, I highly respect your profession. I am not bashing what you do or your importance to the industry. I also agree that the IAM members have every right to be pissed. The ESOP failed and they gave up a lot in return for worthless stock.

BUT...as you state...you and your colleagues have choices where you can apply your trade. So if you're sick of working at ORD in the middle of the night - THEN go get yourself a new job.

I just don't understand those who are bent on ruining the chances for UA to emerge just because they're sick of the BS.
 
Steiner:

"G4G5, good post on a mechanic's point of view. You got it right.

Now for all the others to post something to the effect that the mechanics cannot be allowed to have that attitude."

Of course you can have that attitude. I can understand why many would/do.

BUT like I said to G4G5...just go and get a new job. Unless people enjoy being miserable and bitching, I don't understand why people don't do something about being miserable.
 
United Chicago,
Why can't someone fight for their current job (pay and benefits)? You say If they don't like it quit, you miss the point they ARE satisfied right now or they would just quit. They don't want to work for LESS. So a "no" vote is not being spiteful, it is saying this job is worth what I am making now and I would like to keep it. If they can't keep it at the present set of rules THEN they will go elsewhere. You are putting the cart in front of the horse. They are voting "no" to preserve a job they want. By voting "yes" or not voting, they are sure to have a job they do not want (meaning everything: the job, pay, hours, vacation etc). So the "If it is so bad just quit" mantra is getting real old. IT IS NOT SO BAD RIGHT NOW, they are fighting to keep it that way.

B.N.
 
[blockquote]
----------------
On 1/2/2003 4:59:06 AM G4G5 wrote:


Thanks for the tip.

I saw 3 help wanted add.'s for pilots of which one was for an A300/310 job. What about the other 9000? You know what I ment.


----------------
[/blockquote]

"One add" doesn't mean "one job". you said you hadn't seen any "help wanted" adds for 747-400 pilots, I just showed you one. Most pilots don't limit themselves to one A/C (Just as most mechanics aren't that picky on what jets they work on). a pay check is a paycheck. Denial ain't just a river....
 
B.N.:

I was directly responding to G4G5's scenario of a mechanic that is sick of working outside in the cold, etc. and that there are many jobs open to the mechanics.

I'm certainly not applying that to people who enjoy their jobs.
 
Judge set to rule on United contracts
Machinists union takes court stand against wage cuts
By August Cole, CBS.MarketWatch.com
Last Update: 12:24 PM ET Jan. 2, 2003

CHICAGO (CBS.MW) -- The bankruptcy judge presiding over United Airlines' Chapter 11 filing will rule on Jan. 10 at 9:30 a.m. Central if the airline can break the collective bargaining agreements with its unions, according to the court's Web site.

Judge to rule next Friday on United union contracts
Airline stocks up in early going
Airlines squeeze out rise as bleak '02 ends
More news for UAL

Quote & News Charts Financials Analysts Options SEC Filings


Doing so, the carrier has said, would let the No. 2 airline cut costs to meet terms imposed by its current lenders. United's powerful machinists union has already formally objected in court to the move.

Chief Judge Eugene Wedoff of the Northern District of Illinois U.S. Bankruptcy Court will issue an order that Friday morning and will not hold a hearing, according to a Thursday update of the court's site. See the Web site.

The International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers in a Dec. 31 filing contends that the pay cuts, which would retroactively begin on Jan. 1, are only the beginning of a longer process of paring pay. And the union says the airline hasn't demonstrated that the pay cuts are a key to the company's current operation.

"United Airlines has stated the 13 percent wage reduction it is seeking from IAM members is to satisfy the immediate requirements of the lenders that are providing United with its financing while in bankruptcy. However, this is only the first step. United has also presented additional, more far- reaching permanent proposals," the IAM told members on its Web site.

United will formally respond to the IAM by Jan. 8, spokesman Joe Hopkins said, and the company wouldn't comment ahead of that.

United had proposed late last week that it be permitted to cut wages temporarily or even go as far as ending its current collective bargaining agreements with its unions that represent pilots, attendants, ramp workers, mechanics and machinists. See full story.

The leadership at United's other big unions said they would go along with pay cuts and no raises. Member votes on the matter will be made known next week.

The IAM had earlier decided to not sign off on reduced wages as United was preparing bid to secure a $1.8 billion federal loan guarantee that preceded its bankruptcy filing. In denying United the loan, the Air Transportation Stabilization Board said the company's revenue outlook wasn't reasonable. See full story.

United has made clear the stakes are high because its debtor-in-possession lenders have imposed terms to their loans that call for monthly measures of financial performance. Reducing the wages of its employees will be a key way for the carrier to cut costs.

In recent trading, UAL Corp. (UAL: news, chart, profile), parent of United Airlines, fell 7 cents to $1.36 while the broader airline sector traded mixed. See full story.

August Cole is spot news editor at CBS.MarketWatch.com in Chicago
 
[blockquote]
----------------
On 1/2/2003 9:17:47 AM UnitedChicago wrote:

Steiner:

"G4G5, good post on a mechanic's point of view. You got it right.

Now for all the others to post something to the effect that the mechanics cannot be allowed to have that attitude."

Of course you can have that attitude. I can understand why many would/do.

BUT like I said to G4G5...just go and get a new job. Unless people enjoy being miserable and bitching, I don't understand why people don't do something about being miserable.

----------------
[/blockquote]

What, and leave aviation?
 
kcabpilot:

I highly respect your profession. Good luck to you and those that are leaving for a new opportunity.
 
[blockquote]
----------------
On 1/2/2003 9:17:47 AM UnitedChicago wrote:

BUT like I said to G4G5...just go and get a new job. Unless people enjoy being miserable and bitching, I don't understand why people don't do something about being miserable.

----------------
[/blockquote]

Well it's happening more than you may realize UnitedChicago and it's the most skilled Mechanics that have been leaving first. I myself am almost certainly gone within the next three months regardless of what happens. As I've said before, what Mechanics do is behind the scenes out on a dark tarmac in the middle of the night. If everything goes well you wouldn't even know we existed.
 
Back
Top