What's new

State proposes work requirement for food stamps

777 fixer said:
 
What has happened with the 787 has more to do with poor decision making rather than technical details.  The list of those mistakes is well known.  Here's one however that a lot of people probably have not heard before.
We were talking about the complexities of integrating new technologies driving up costs, often over budget.  It happens. Keep making your stupid argument to prove nothing though.
 
Back on track, I totally support welfare for the working poor. If you are working and can't make enough money to meet your needs I feel you should get help. I don't feel mooches should be able to sit on their ass year after year after year after year after year and live off of the taxpayers.  That needs to stop.
 
SparrowHawk said:
It's my time if I say it is. That's what Liberty is. The right to create your own rules as long as you don't initiate force against another or infringe upon another's rights.
 
The activists in question can speak freely in a public place. Doesn't mean I have to acknowledge them or engage them in any way if I choose not to do so.For some Liberty is sooo hard to grasp. Perhaps a lack of a deity in their life explains it????
Oh come one. Get over your self will you. No one mentioned rights. And you know that. You can do what ever you want. However if you are a public servant in and you are at a public speaking event where you have spoken you damn well be ready to speak to people. If you want to scamper away like a frightened girl and try try to argue that you don't want to have your lunch disturbed (are you making that one up or did Paul actually say that) you go right ahead. Don't be surprised if that load of crap blows black all over you.

You're a public servant and I pay your salary. Your ass is mine if you are out in public at a public speaking event.

Missing deity? Please.
 
Public Servant? Or Public Slave? Difference.
 
Actually My ass is NEVER yours as I am an sovereign Citizen. You don't own me. You may contribute to my salary but you DO NOT own me or my assets.
 
SparrowHawk said:
Public Servant? Or Public Slave? Difference.
 
Actually My ass is NEVER yours as I am an sovereign Citizen. You don't own me. You may contribute to my salary but you DO NOT own me or my assets.
Servant, slave. Take your pick. No difference to me.

Never said jack about your assets. If you are a public servant in an elected office who's function is to represent me and my interests and you are at a public function you are available to the public. Why are you having such a hard time accepting this? OH yea, you think the Pauls are the second coming and they fart rose petals.
 
Ms Tree said:
Servant, slave. Take your pick. No difference to me.

Never said jack about your assets. If you are a public servant in an elected office who's function is to represent me and my interests and you are at a public function you are available to the public. Why are you having such a hard time accepting this? OH yea, you think the Pauls are the second coming and they fart rose petals.
Not very quick on the uptake are you? What are the first 3 letters pf the word "assets".
 
I know reading comprehension is difficult for those with Government School educations but look up the respective definitions of Slave versus Servant.
 
I'm not a giant fan of Rand Paul. Mostly because like his Dad I am a true believer. However, I firmly believe that when both the Republicans and the Democrats attack a person then I think that person is likely right.
 
You mentioned ass and assets so I was not sure. Suspected as much but was not sure.

My education like hundreds of thousands of other did me just fine. I am quite aware of the differences between the terms in question. I just could care less which one you feel like using since you seem to have a flair for the dramatic.

Or it could mean that when a lot of people think he's nuts that he just might be nuts. I know that possibility could never enter your mind seeing as the Pauls seems to walk on water.
 
Ms Tree said:
You mentioned ass and assets so I was not sure. Suspected as much but was not sure.

My education like hundreds of thousands of other did me just fine. I am quite aware of the differences between the terms in question. I just could care less which one you feel like using since you seem to have a flair for the dramatic.

Or it could mean that when a lot of people think he's nuts that he just might be nuts. I know that possibility could never enter your mind seeing as the Pauls seems to walk on water.
Here's what I know to be true.
 
Ron Paul has NEVER voted for a tax increase.
Ron Paul has NEVER voted for an unbalanced budget
Ron Paul has been a champion of Individual Liberty since he was first elected.
Ron Paul has has NEVER met with a lobbyist.
 
That's close enough to walking on water for me.
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zGDisyWkIBM
 
This speech was in 2002
 
La Li Lu Le Lo said:
We were talking about the complexities of integrating new technologies driving up costs, often over budget.  It happens. Keep making your stupid argument to prove nothing though.
 
They why are some programs with new technologies stay on budget and other don't?
 
777 fixer said:
They why are some programs with new technologies stay on budget and other don't?
You really are thick. 
 
The answer of course is others don't.
 
SparrowHawk said:
Here's what I know to be true.
 
Ron Paul has NEVER voted for a tax increase.
Ron Paul has NEVER voted for an unbalanced budget
Ron Paul has been a champion of Individual Liberty since he was first elected.
Ron Paul has has NEVER met with a lobbyist.
 
That's close enough to walking on water for me.
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zGDisyWkIBM
 
This speech was in 2002
 
For shame.
 
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2014/08/27/former-iowa-state-senator-pleads-guilty-in-ron-paul-endorsement-for-pay-scheme/
 
Oh crap. That is priceless. Ron Paul is a corrupt politician. Who would have thought. Lol
 
777 fixer said:
And this compares equally with Bush & Obama collapsing the economy? Ordering drone strikes killing thousands of innocents?
 
Not to mention wars in Libya, Iraq, Afghanistan & Yemen. All costing TRILLIONS of tax dollars and the untold lives of the citizens of these countries, along with the lives of US Soldiers.
 
Not to mention this type of "Walking Around Money" that while illegal persists in virtually EVERY election in every state. Some are paid to lobbyists post election. It's called crony capitalism.
 
Also, some of the bribes in this case go directly to the campaign people, namely Doug Weed & Jesse Benton who did not see eye to eye on certain things. If you look at the history of those two you'll find some very interesting affiliations.
 
SparrowHawk said:
 
Not to mention this type of "Walking Around Money" that while illegal persists in virtually EVERY election in every state. Some are paid to lobbyists post election. It's called crony capitalism.
 .
Ah yes. The old "everyone else does it defense". If that's the case then Paul is like everyone else. A corrupt lying cheating politician. Pretty sure you have made the claim that Paul was above all that. I wonder what else he has done that you don't know about.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top