What's new
By:

Temporary Injunction against USAPA filed today

BoeingBoy said:
Sure I'll be glad to help - look for question marks (?). They denote a question as opposed to a statement.

Jim
Click to expand...

Oh, you mean like in this post that you never returned an answer to after begging me for a reply?


"I never said that the company said anything about jail time or anything else, just that they used the term illegal before anyone was convicted. Just like some east guys did and I spoke up about it.

Now, there were plenty of westicles on here partying and claiming millions of dollars in damages that the company was asking for and how USAPA would be bankrupted, remember that? Probably not since that would be short term memory and heck it was westies anyway and you don't comment on their bad behavior."
 
Pi brat said:
"I never said that the company said anything about jail time or anything else, just that they used the term illegal before anyone was convicted. Just like some east guys did and I spoke up about it.
Click to expand...

I fail to see any question marks in there - was it supposed to be a question???? <- question marks in case you don't know what they look like.

Like Nosum and AWE, you love to ask questions and demand answers, but aren't forthcoming with answers. Too busy taking swipes at anyone who doesn't accept the all-knowing pronouncements of Pi the great. Since you provide no answers, why should I? Oh...that's right...because the all-knowing Pi says so... :lol:

Jim
 
Move2CLT said:
The Nic was never on trial. Using a perceived sense of unfairness as a defense just doesn't cut it and, as a result, you lost on the merits of the case. Only ripeness saved the day. With DFR2, you won't have that.
Click to expand...
The east had a legal out and opted to use it. Not unexpected by anyone. So what's for supper?
 
Move2CLT said:
Nonsense. When the Nic is voted in we'll take our rightful seats in USAirways aircraft (there is no east west aircraft).

HAVE A NICE DAY!!!
Click to expand...



Coming up on 5 years for the Nic anniversary. We are going to throw a big party. We are going to have an Elvis impersonator, and a guy dress up as St. Nic. We'll let you know when it is coming. Start planning for the 10th, ideas? 😀
 
]
Move2CLT said:
The Nic was never on trial. Using a perceived sense of unfairness as a defense just doesn't cut it and, as a result, you lost on the merits of the case. Only ripeness saved the day. With DFR2, you won't have that.
Click to expand...

The Nic was on trial from day one. The merits were never an issue when we went to the 9th. You were devestated by the ripeness, which was the tactic.Merits were never an issue.



The judge ordered that USAPA must negotiate to implement the Nicolau Award unchanged into a combined collective bargaining agreement. It also ordered that USAPA could not negotiate separate agreements for the pilot groups. A later hearing on monetary damages, if any, will be held.







The court was also wrong about whether the case was ripe to be heard since the only action taken by USAPA was to make a proposal in bargaining. No actual agreement was reached with US Airways to change the Nicolau Award. In fact, the court admitted that US Airways has not responded to the USAPA proposal. So the proposal cannot have caused any injury to the plaintiffs.
 
Here is what I said


Can you please help me, I can't find any posts where you ask me anything, I'll be happy to answer but then i expect an answer from you about wether you carried discrepancies or not, so unless you are prepared to answer, i would come up with some more lame jibber jabber which is what you do best. I hearby insult you.

Here is jim's predictable jibber jabber,


BoeingBoy said:
Sure I'll be glad to help - look for question marks (?). They denote a question as opposed to a statement.

Jim
Click to expand...

[removed]
 
AWE_SHUCKS said:
Here is what I said


Can you please help me, I can't find any posts where you ask me anything, I'll be happy to answer but then i expect an answer from you about wether you carried discrepancies or not, so unless you are prepared to answer, i would come up with some more lame jibber jabber which is what you do best. I hearby insult you.

Here is jim's predictable jibber jabber,




the idiot never asked me a thing and still cant tell us if he ever carried discrepancies or not because he talks the talk but he dont walk the walk. just a fat, spent old man loser.
Click to expand...

You know Jim is just not used to being questioned. He was probably the only pilot over at FFocus and as such could pull off his B.S. without anyone calling him on it.

I think he is slipping. I flew F/E for him when he was about my age and he seemed Ok, if a little Columbo like..........
 
700UW said:
Crossing the IAM picket line and during the 30 day cooling off period and strike pilots assisted in cleaning planes, thereby performing struck work and violating another labor group's CBA.
Click to expand...


Amazing. Insert AMFA in place of IAM in the quote above and you have just defined what the IAMAW did during the AMFA strike on NWA. You know the one that you constantly say that was not a scab action by your comrades.
 
BoeingBoy said:
A few business days after a contract without Nic is ratified.

Jim
Click to expand...

Save your cash then for the West pilots. You didn't listen to Baptiste and Wilder, you don't listen to what the 9th said obviously about the Nic, so it is always interesting to see how the West spend their cash...........Your lessons are quite costly.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

U
Federal Court Grants US Airways' Request For an Expedited Hearing On A Preliminary Injunction Agains
15 16 17
Replies
241
Views
38K
cynic
C
W
AA/FareChase Suit - Sabre Joins Suit against AA
Replies
0
Views
1K
WingNaPrayer
W
T
PHL Baggage Issues Again today
Replies
9
Views
2K
john john
J
U
Response to USAPA ad in USA Today
17 18 19
Replies
276
Views
58K
apollo
A
L
Amfa's About-face On Free Speech
2 3
Replies
37
Views
3K
Bob Owens
B

Latest posts

Back
Top