KCFlyer said:
I'm just reading your sacred document. It says "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." So which militia to you belong to...and is it well regulated. We're letting you bear arms, so you need to be in the militia.
Not to take this off topic about the second amendment....but if I am reading the sacred text properly, your right to bear arms is to insure the security of our free state. Looks like you're going to Syria Petey...you can take your guns. Thank uncle Sam for that.
The term "well regulated" doesn't mean what you think it means. Liberals constantly gets it wrong. It doesn't mean extensive government regulation.
But what does well-regulated really mean?
Via Constitution.org
The following are taken from the Oxford English Dictionary, and bracket in time the writing of the 2nd amendment:
1709: If a liberal Education has formed in us well-regulated Appetites and worthy Inclinations.
1714: The practice of all well-regulated courts of justice in the world.
1812: The equation of time is the adjustment of the difference of time as shown by a well-regulated clock and a true sun dial.
1848: A remissness for which I am sure every well-regulated person will blame the Mayor.
1862: It appeared to her well-regulated mind, like a clandestine proceeding.
1894: The newspaper, a never wanting adjunct to every well-regulated American embryo city.
The phrase well-regulated was in common use long before 1789, and remained so for a century thereafter. It referred to the property of something being in proper working order. Something that was well-regulated was calibrated correctly, functioning as expected. Establishing government oversight of the peoples arms was not only not the intent in using the phrase in the 2nd amendment, it was precisely to render the government powerless to do so that the founders wrote it.