What's new

Truth Hurt?

How many of those investigations target the personal lives of the president and members of his administration?

The two hicks from Arkansas brought all that stuff to their own door with past loose ends from their reign prior and then again with their arrival on the beltway with all the little trysts and such between the two of them with personal data,inside deals and such.Why wasn't Hillary hung out to dry the way Martha was?

How's about:

Scott Jennings
Sara Taylor
Susan Ralston
Ken Mehlman
Harriet Miers
Scooter Libby
David Addington
Stephen Haddley
Stephen Cambone
William E. Moschella
Karl Rove
Dick Cheney
Alberto Gonzales
Don Rumsfeld
Condi Rice
CIA director
NSA director

Did I miss any?

Oh,I forgot any nominations to the bench...they get real personal.

Hey...when you go to the beltway...all bets are off for private lives no matter which side you choose.

Most of the news media anymore are the ones doing the digging,all in the interest of ratings you know.
 
How's about:

Scott Jennings
Sara Taylor
Susan Ralston
Ken Mehlman
Harriet Miers
Scooter Libby
David Addington
Stephen Haddley
Stephen Cambone
William E. Moschella
Karl Rove
Dick Cheney
Alberto Gonzales
Don Rumsfeld
Condi Rice
CIA director
NSA director

Did I miss any?
Nice try, but in your stereotypical fashion you diverted the topic and did not answer the question. All the investigations you listed had to do with official and governmental duties not with private personal behavior.
 
Nice try, but in your stereotypical fashion you diverted the topic and did not answer the question. All the investigations you listed had to do with official and governmental duties not with private personal behavior.

Thanks for the kind words.....

How did it get into 'personal behavior' any how?
With a government investigation that blossomed..... :lol:
 
Thanks for the kind words.....

How did it get into 'personal behavior' any how?
With a government investigation that blossomed..... :lol:
You're getting warmer dell...Clinton's "personal behaviour" started as an investigation into a bad real estate deal. A pretty big investigation ensued - nothing was found. At that point, the special prosecutor should have said "I tried" and gone home. Instead, he commenced to "investigate" any allegation that the right wing press put out there. Mostly his "personal behaviour".
 
Why did you screw up the Tom Corbett thing then :lol:

///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

Just to see if folks(especially you..Dell), would catch the "mistake"(and as expected, you guys did. Good job I must say)

Tug McBear 😛h34r:
 
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

Just to see if folks(especially you..Dell), would catch the "mistake"(and as expected, you guys did. Good job I must say)

Tug McBear 😛h34r:

Wow, aren’t you something! Glad to see you’re getting a return on that GED investment.
 
Wow, aren’t you something! Glad to see you’re getting a return on that GED investment.


///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

I must say, that I'm REALLY surprised that you guys have NOT picked up on "our"..GOOD cop/BAD cop SCHEME.

NH/McGroin
 
Are you done making a fool of yourself?

First, you congratulate us for catching the “good cop/bad cop mistakeâ€￾.

Just to see if folks(especially you..Dell), would catch the "mistake"(and as expected, you guys did. Good job I must say)

Now you're surprised we have NOT picked up on it!

I must say, that I'm REALLY surprised that you guys have NOT picked up on "our"..GOOD cop/BAD cop SCHEME.

I retract my previous statement. You haven’t benefited from your Good Enough Diploma.

You're too easy!!
 
That is because USAviation migrated to new software late at night on August, 19 2002, and all members had to re-register.


I thought they were investigating the sexual misconduct (harassment) by Clinton.
 
I retract my previous statement. You haven’t benefited from your Good Enough Diploma.

You're too easy!!
Actually, what's easy is this - NHBB has not held back in his dislike of Little W and Big Dick. But he's never made a disparaging remark about a poster who disagreew with him.
 
I believe it is lying to a GJ that is illegal.
It is perjury only if the false statement is material to the case, i.e., if it could affect the outcome of the investigation (see post 68 in this thread).

In Clinton's case, independent counsel Ken Starr investigated ancient allegations of sexual harassment while Clinton was governor of Arkansas. The lie concerned a consensual sexual encounter which took place years later. Whether the President had oral sex with Monica Lewinsky, who was a willing partner, did not help prove whether or not Clinton sexually harassed Paula Corbin Jones or Jennifer Flowers.
 
What has always confused me is when people speak of character and politicians people always seem to forget what GW did against McCain in 2000 when campaigning in SC.

First, it tends to support what someone else was saying about the mentality of the 'right' in SC since why would GW/Rove have used such tactics if they did not think it would work.

Secondly, the fact that GW/Rove would stoop to such revolting tactics to win a race is IMO, a sad coment on the US given that a majority of voters in this country still cast a ballot for him.

I have seen and heard politicians do some really nasty and pathetic things to get into office or out of trouble but to use a innocent child as a means to draw out racists and get their vote, that is one of the absolute things worst that can be done. GW's actions will follow that child around for the rest of her life. Ms. McCain had to explain to her 10 or 11 year old child what had happened.

GW is not a man. He is a coward who thinks the end justify the means. He will do anything to get what he wants with out regard for who gets hurt in the process. He has conducted his administration in the same manner that he conducted his campaign.

Yes politicians are generally a pail of pond scum. Some better than others but few have ever be worthy of a kind word. That being said, IMO, I hope GW has a special place in Hell waiting for his pathetic carcass. He has set this country back decades. He makes McCarthy look like a alter boy.

As for impeachable offenses. He took an oath to "preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States." I would argue that given the vagueness of the articles of impeachment, one could easily make a case that he failed to do so. He knowingly placed the US military in harms way based on false pretenses. He has lied to 'We the people' more times than I can count of matters far more important than whether he got a BJ in the Oval. As far as I am concerned, every time a POTUS opens he mouth to the people of the US, he should be considered under oath. He works for me. I pay his salary and he damn well better not lie to the share holders.

Having said that, we have far more important issues to take care of than to conduct some circus court to hold that nit wit liable for what history will condemn him for in due time.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top