I totally disagree, and from more than a few van rides and cockpit visits, I would agree on your statement of how the majority your work group "feels".
There isn't any "funny math" involved. The pilots gave larger in total dollars and percentages, and individually than the other groups. Another large subset of pilots took even larger cuts due to the large pay differences associated with CA to FO, WB FO to NB FO. I personally took two displacements from Captain, a 49% paycut, plus my "funny math" of working an additional 75 flight hours/year due to vacation changes (1 additional month/yr).
AA pilots have also lagged most other carriers including LCC's since 2003, even UAL before their last cuts. Additonally, AA pilots have the second worst seniority progression to Captain in the USA, only better than U. That puts more than 1/3 of AA pilots at least 20%-30% behind nearly every other US carrier.
Someone posted a few days ago how it would only be "fair" if the pilots flew 85 hour bidlines like other carriers. Okay, I thought, maybe I would do 85 if the 12-15 year FA's cut their hourly rate back to $35/hour since that is the accurate pay difference that 12-15 year AA pilots have when compared to other airlines. Maybe "fair" is a somewhat subjective personal opinion. How one "feels" about money in your group seems to be tied with "fair" too. AA pilots never negotiated an industry leading contract like the FA's. In fact, aren't your rates still near the top? AA pilots aren't.
Your group negotiated your rates, compared to the industry, you did well. You may not like what you got, but my hats off to you, you are what you negotiate, "fair" or "feel" has nothing to do with it.